-If they are still removing the IGB ensure that we will have other WH mapping tools

Ability to save graphic settings and reload specific settings from the drop down list.

I know it's a stupid little thing, but I would really like the option of being able to warp to an existing bookmark, while having my solar system screen open by right-clicking. Having to close down the solar system map everytime you have to warp to a bookmark (especially when you have a truckload of bm's in a system) is a frustrating little thing.

I know it's a stupid little thing, but I would really like the option of being able to warp to an existing bookmark, while having my solar system screen open by right-clicking. Having to close down the solar system map everytime you have to warp to a bookmark (especially when you have a truckload of bm's in a system) is a frustrating little thing.

Corp Bm, raise to 1000 (at least)

Axloth Okiah asked about convos being added to notifications so they dont get close accidentally. I'm enquiring about them now as well.

2) Simpler, more accurate way of renaming hangar divisions. At the moment you have to go to the Corporation window > Details tab > Divisions button at the bottom to rename the divisions of an array like the CHA. It's not very intuitive. Then whatever you set for the division names will be the same for any array that has divisions. Why not just let us click the name of division and rename it right there independent of other arrays with divisions. It's simpler, more intuitive and more accurate.

1) Personal Ship Maintenance Array. To work in the same way that the current personal hangar array works but for ships. Each player has a certain amount of storage allocated and each player can only see and take from his/her own ships. This would be a huge boost for wormhole corp security.

2) Simpler, more accurate way of renaming hangar divisions. At the moment you have to go to the Corporation window > Details tab > Divisions button at the bottom to rename the divisions of an array like the CHA. It's not very intuitive. Then whatever you set for the division names will be the same for any array that has divisions. Why not just let us click the name of division and rename it right there independent of other arrays with divisions. It's simpler, more intuitive and more accurate.

Thanks for your hard work corbexx

Also I did not get yet how the IGB removal shall be compensated. Forcing people to ALT+TAB or a mandatory 2nd monitor would be a huge hit to quality of EvE-life.

The IGB wont be going for years, and there will be replacements for it. Please don't make me get foxfour here to say same thing.

Going to try and ask about this today.

POSes are fine. It's the roles that needs fixing.
It doesn't make sense that you can't give a corp member access to make stuff like drugs, without giving him the keys to the kindgom.

I don't need a new shiny holy Jesus POS from heaven, especialy not if CCP is still considering docking/mooring/whatever. All I need is the ability to give people access to what I want them to have access to without compromising the entire corp.

POSes are fine. It's the roles that needs fixing.
It doesn't make sense that you can't give a corp member access to make stuff like drugs, without giving him the keys to the kindgom.

I don't need a new shiny holy Jesus POS from heaven, especialy not if CCP is still considering docking/mooring/whatever. All I need is the ability to give people access to what I want them to have access to without compromising the entire corp.

Allowing Director or CEO access to PCHA's (by extension PSMA's) so that you can recover all that crap left in there when they AFG or leave corp

2) t3 discussions need to happen. Their are three big elephants in the room, their tank, the recent overuse of tengus by everybody (mostly nullsec though), and their future configuration (will they turn into how d3's function, this isn't a bad option and should not be instantly removed from the table just because).

I'd like copying the new Destroyers functionality to be an idea that is entirely chucked into the bin with regard to T3 cruisers. It's a completely different set of art assets, the destroyers are a single ship with some animations, you'd need to redo the T3 models to make the most of this. Considering the T3 cruisers are some of the best looking (or most detailed...) ships in the game it would be a huge waste of art.

I'm 100% happy with the current way subsystems work. They just need some re-balancing in a few areas, namely a reduction in ehp and probably mobility.

Allow us to assemble T3 ships in space at a POS. We can refit them now, finally (thank you for that), now take all the way and let us assemble them in wspace.s

Whaaaaaat? Is that really not possible at the moment? Yes this definitely needs fixing. I can recall being unable to swap subsystems at POS but didn't realise you couldn't even assemble the ships in the first place. (I've never been in a corp with much wormhole industry)

I really do not clearly know what I want santa-ccp to give me next year, but I do know I want, perhaps even need my game experience to be different than it has been lately. Space is empty, fear is real and when the scouts find another group for one reason or another fights are not had. So often people only feel what they can lose so nothing happens. I can jump solo into a hole with active moving ships and they scatter in fear. A buzzard can be hacking cans with the nearest support five systems off yet the residents hide for fear of what is not even there. As the game is sculpted it would be nice if the optimum solution were to interact with other ships rather than to hide as hiding is rather terrible gameplay for both parties. Clearly there is a problem. Encounters are too rare and often one sided with the other party having no chance at all and no consolation prize, only loss for trying. As future changes are discussed please watch for opportunities to increase interaction and decrease the all to common one sidedness of so many encounters. Perhaps attractive isking opportunities could spawn as a result of and in the wake of battle, perhaps the mechanics of fights could be changed to yield more mixed rather than one sided results.

PS, it would be nice if the c13s were little ship holes rather than little armor ship holes as little ships is rather limited without the further limitation of tank.

I think this is an obvious byproduct of 2 things. One is the mass/range change which went a long way to convincing smaller corps to leave wh space for incursion isk. The second is the small group of big wh corps that routinely field large fleets.

I haven't looked at skyfighters numbers, but I'll be honest w/ you - when I see one of your guys I think blob and either close a connection to be done w/ you or go out to the kitchen and make a pot of soup (substitute mow the lawn in appropriate months). I come back in a few hours and re-evaluate and go from there.

Here's where I'm coming from on this. I don't like the 30 man prot/guardian/jamgu/loki fleet. I don't like to be in it. I don't like to fight it. That's for a couple of reasons. It's boring to me. I don't like the day to day burden of dealing with that large a number of guys. It makes for more work (keeping everyone entertained), more drama, and any time you get more then 50 guys together one of them feels a need to espouse (my opinion here) liberal propoganda crap. I don't log into eve to deal w/ any of that. (NOTE: your average liberal guy doesn't want to hear me talk about the second amendment in the US or my views on taxes and other stuff - there are 2 sides to the coin - I get it - I just don't want to deal w/ the other side of the coin when I play a game to relax)

I'm not saying any of the above stuff is outright wrong, it's just stuff I choose to not be apart of. If you like that sort of stuff - go for it. So, I'm in a small group of good guys that I really like to play eve with. No drama, no pressure to entertain, no views I don't want to listen to. It's all good for me (thanks guys). So that leaves me with an inability to compete/pvp w/ larger folks. I choose to just ignore them. I think arranged fights where folks agree to this and that is kind of wierd, so I don't go for that either.

I just choose to bypass dealing with larger wh corps to the extent I can. I'm happy to do that. Sure I miss out on some fights. Sure I get possed up by superior numbers from time to time. These things I am glad to trade away to hang w/ a small group of guys that I get along with, a laid back corp structure and play style, no drama and no 'going to work' feel when I log in.

My point?? I don't fear you, I just choose to not deal w/ the big you that may or may not be 2 wh out. We don't sit on comms complaining that some big bad wh bro is blocking us from enjoying eve. We do other things until you pass. We accept what we are and where we are and are happy for it.

You've chosen to be in one of the larger corps. You need to accept that folks aren't going to fight you because of that choice. I don't think there is a cure. It's human nature. Some guys like to mob around in big fleets and do that stuff. Some guys don't. Accept it and keep scanning or change what's making the game unfun for you.

TL/DR Bane Nucleus and skyfighters are evil.... I hate them!

I don't fear you, I just choose to play the game in a manner that prevents me from taking you head on. That being said I wouldn't normally take the time and expend the effort to see if you have something I can deal with. I just play the odds and don't.

You see fear, I see an opportunity to make some Ham and Bean soup (yeah, I put hand made rivvels in it, so it's the good kind). I'm not saying you're wrong in all cases. I'm sure there are plenty of guys out there that do fear you.

I'm saying that's the price you pay for being in a corp that has a 133 in the players attribute on a show info. I just took the time to check you KB and you have much more reasonable numbers than I would have guessed. So you're more right and I'm more wrong, but that doesn't change your corps rep. You guys are known and notable, and that has a price.

In the rare times we meet, in the future we'll probably have a go at you. We're pretty lazy and I think only one of us (not me) is any good at all about checking current KB in real time as we meet folks.

I'd say overall it's name recognition. You guys went big on rep a while back. Good or bad, it's a rep you earned - now you have to carry it. Want some fun? Create a new corp w/ all the same guys in it. Call it something bearish and womp up on guys like me that don't take the time to research stuff.

The recall probes button repositioned away from the scan button. like move it to the other side of the probe scanner window.


tired me recalls combats instead of intiating scan. = site running domi's get to live another day

looks like the other thread is no longer watched/updated? So I repost my little **** in here.

Dscan Window:
Since we have this filter selection for dscan, I always wanted to have a second one.
So instead of the checkbox to turn the filter on/off there should be a switch to select between 2 filter selections.

Scan Probes:
If they identify the signature but not pointed it down(shown as a circle or sphere) I'd like to see those colored yellow instead of red.

Gas/Grav Sites:
Sleepers should spawn immediately. Too many ninja miners around...

Initiate-probe-scan and Initiate-dscan hotkeys please!

this X 1000

I guess this thread should be deleted and replaced with his wormhole alt.