EVE Search - "Give Your Voice A Chance!" WINGSPAN//Chance Ravinne for C...

Check My IP Information

All Channels

CSM Campaigns

"Give Your Voice A Chance!" WINGSPAN//Chance Ravinne for C...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mr Epeen It's All About Me 7742	Posted - 2015.02.02 17:27:24 - [31] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: Ten months ago, I was a nobody. You are entertaining for sure and people like your vids. Your vids that to date have covered one tiny aspect of this huge universe. So while I like you and what you've brought to the game, I can't vote for someone with as little knowledge of the big picture as you have. But you have a good attitude and I look forward to seeing what you bring to the table for next years election. Keep up the good work. You are a fine cheerleader, but not ready for a position on the CSM yet. Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 55	Posted - 2015.02.03 00:53:46 - [32] - Quote Dradis Aulmais wrote: Ok my questions: What is your opinion on the status of high sec? Ganking? War Dec dodging? Is there a AFK cloaker problem? Why or why not? What changes to the game do you like so far? What do you think needs to be fixed? I'm sure I will have more. These things fall somewhat outside my platform, but here are my thoughts: HISEC IN GENERAL In general, I really like hisec. I know that may sound strange, but for me it is the only area of EVE that always feels like an MMO. It feels vibrant and alive, with people who will respond to you in local instead of fretting over opsec. You can see interesting ships pass by and not ** your pants worrying they will yellowbox you. WARDECS AND GANKING I don't have a problem with ganking, bumping, or wardecking in concept. These are all things allowed in the sandbox. However, I think the options available to the victims of these acts are poor, especially with wardecs. There is something wrong with a system when the best solution to an entity wardecking you is to quit playing the game or dissolving and reforming your corporation. Primarily there is no fiscal incentive for most "victim" corps to fight out a war, so giving up is usually the least fiscally damaging option. As far as suicide ganking, the best suggestion I've heard (not mine obviously) was to change how security status affects you. That dropping negative will very quickly give you a suspect timer, because yes, ganking people constantly is suspicious! This makes it so that ganking is still just as possible as it is now, but one cannot cruise around with impunity until the millisecond before turning on his modules. CLOAKY CAMPING I rely hugely on cloaky camping for my activities, so I have a lot of experience there. On the one hand, I think 90% of players overreact to having a single neutral in system. They imagine the "worst" and are paralyzed with fear. Heavens forbid they lose a single Ishtar! On the other hand, there should be some kind of counter to long-term cloaking. What about a deployable structure that disables cloaking within "X' AU around it, but requires active anchoring (i.e. you must sit at it to anchor it)? Something like this could force the cloaky's hand, especially within a set area and time frame. But it also requires the launcher to correctly guess the camper's intentions (and also limits their own option to cloak). Ultimately, I think cloaky camping should be addressed, but I don't believe it is a game-ruining problem that should be prioritized over other, more important matters. EVE CHANGES** As far as "changes to the game so far" what time frame do you mean? Because there is a big difference between changes in the last six months versus all-time changes to EVE! You've just read another amazing post by WiNGSPANTT, the 4th Best Commentator on YouTube! GÇï Follow along with my exploration and stealth bomber adventures on my YouTube channel
Phoenix Jones Isogen 5 1040	Posted - 2015.02.03 01:12:16 - [33] - Quote A deployable wouldn't work. If you were to deal with perma cloakies, it would have to be a ship or a module on a ship. Give the players the ability to Hunt cloaked people. While that would benefit the nullsec camp, it would mess up a good hunk of wormhole space. Heck we'll have people inside a enemy hole for MONTHS watching their movements, trying to capitalize on what they do. Giving them a defensive module that would destroy the scouts ability to scout... What effects one area of space, effects all area's of space, some with benefit, some with negatives. Just be careful with what you may ask for, because it may wreck a different area of gameplay. FYI, good email to the corp last week. :-) Keep up the good work. We need actual happy players out there. Yaay!!!!
Dominic Erata Submarine Games 0	Posted - 2015.02.03 20:07:17 - [34] - Quote I support this product or service. Quote: EVE CHANGES As far as "changes to the game so far" what time frame do you mean? Because there is a big difference between changes in the last six months versus all-time changes to EVE! But Chance, how can you honestly say that changes like the addition of the Jump Fatigue mechanic have had no effect on EVE gameplay? While it may have little effect on highsec denizens and players without the need or skill to use capitals, it certainly does affect basically all of nullsec, especially the blocs.
Dradis Aulmais By Light and Banner's Fallen 683	Posted - 2015.02.03 21:02:17 - [35] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: EVE CHANGES As far as "changes to the game so far" what time frame do you mean? Because there is a big difference between changes in the last six months versus all-time changes to EVE! Let's go with since you started playing what changes have you liked? What have you not liked? CSM 10: Mike Azariah, Sugar Kyle, Chance Ravinne, Jenshae chrioptera Do No Vote For: Tora Bushido, Bobmon
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 56	Posted - 2015.02.03 21:05:32 - [36] - Quote Dominic Erata wrote: I support this product or service. Quote: EVE CHANGES As far as "changes to the game so far" what time frame do you mean? Because there is a big difference between changes in the last six months versus all-time changes to EVE! But Chance, how can you honestly say that changes like the addition of the Jump Fatigue mechanic have had no effect on EVE gameplay? While it may have little effect on highsec denizens and players without the need or skill to use capitals, it certainly does affect basically all of nullsec, especially the blocs. Sorry not sure where you thought I said anything like that...? You quoted me asking which changes someone wanted me to comment on. Indubitably jump changes have affected Eve, I think only a fool would dispute that. You've just read another amazing post by WiNGSPANTT, the 4th Best Commentator on YouTube! GÇï Follow along with my exploration and stealth bomber adventures on my YouTube channel
Dominic Erata Submarine Games 0	Posted - 2015.02.03 21:17:29 - [37] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: Dominic Erata wrote: I support this product or service. Quote: EVE CHANGES As far as "changes to the game so far" what time frame do you mean? Because there is a big difference between changes in the last six months versus all-time changes to EVE! But Chance, how can you honestly say that changes like the addition of the Jump Fatigue mechanic have had no effect on EVE gameplay? While it may have little effect on highsec denizens and players without the need or skill to use capitals, it certainly does affect basically all of nullsec, especially the blocs. Sorry not sure where you thought I said anything like that...? You quoted me asking which changes someone wanted me to comment on. Indubitably jump changes have affected Eve, I think only a fool would dispute that. I somehow misread what you'd written. I blame it on the cold medicine. Disregard. I still support Chance for CSM X.
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie Brawlers Inc. 1416	Posted - 2015.02.03 21:25:41 - [38] - Quote You have my vote. The failed high sec antimatter delivery was hilarious. New player resources: Uni Wiki - General Info Eve Altruist - PvP Belligerent Undesirables - High Sec Pvp
Bayonnefrog Hedion University Amarr Empire 35	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:14:47 - [39] - Quote Look. Another CSM candidate who wants to be space famous.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 58	Posted - 2015.02.05 16:20:52 - [40] - Quote I am already famous enough for my liking. Now is the time to put notoriety to good use. Bayonnefrog wrote: Look. Another CSM candidate who wants to be space famous. You've just read another amazing post by WiNGSPANTT, the 4th Best Commentator on YouTube! GÇï Follow along with my exploration and stealth bomber adventures on my YouTube channel

Norsel Lothbroke WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 1	Posted - 2015.02.05 23:00:43 - [41] - Quote This guy inspires, create content, and he does it with humor, smiles and a bit of sarcasm. But better yet ... not corrupted by bittervetness and negativity !! People actually LIKE being blown to pieces by this man - because he has passion! We need new eyes, new blood, new strength in CSM ! ... its a new dawn, a new age, a new expansion cycle ! I do not believe you need to know every aspect of EVE, thats why there is more than 1 CSM! You need passion and an open creative mind, more than playing years .... My vote is going towards the innovative positive progress of EVE ! - Chance Ravinne // Norsel OUT o7
Fugue Crow SergalJerk Test Alliance Please Ignore 8	Posted - 2015.02.06 17:18:10 - [42] - Quote Chance is a big part of what got me rolling solo bomber PVP and helping to restore SergalJerk to its glory as the best small gang covert ops corp in the game. He's inspiring, he's charismatic, and he seems to have an attitude that suggests he really wants to improve the marketing of this game and get more players in. More players = more targets = more deliveries = yes. Chance, your opinions on hisec are quite valid, but bumping and hyperdunk setups having no consequence is something many players find toxic. Do you think it's a good idea for suspicious activity that leads to setting up a gank to generate a suspect flag, which offers the opportunity for counterganking to become a playstyle? Example: I'm flying a Bowhead, hauling thirty quadrillion isk worth of ...idunno, compressed marauders. Some hoser slams a Machariel into me, and knocks me off my alignment. I attempt to re-align, and he bumps me a second time. At this point the Machariel goes suspect, giving him a choice: risk being fired on or risk me warping off. Suicide ganking right now is too formulaic, and player skill has almost completely left it at this point - everything's solved. Adding this element of risk and counterplay would put a LOT of fun back into it. Sure I might ship my bumper down to a Stabber, but it would definitely not reduce the number of players suicide ganking. Heck, it might become a good way to get fights in hisec, too, through escalation and bait-bumping. I get a couple bumps on with my Mach, and his Stratios buddy uncloaks to try to countergank. Now we've got a fight on our hands, and it has turned suicide ganking into a form of bidirectional PvP. It would also open up the game to more new players that don't understand or like the concept of bumping having no consequence to the bumper (which is absolutely stupid from the perspective of both law AND physics). By the way, I love your idea of a cloaking inhibitor. This would create a very interesting shift in playstyle - but there's one problem. Gate camps - and cloaking being one of the few ways to escape certain styles of bubble camps. Just keep that in mind if the design goes forward. Another question: what do you think about faction warfare plex farming? Personally I think there is a large part of the community that has a problem with it, and I had an interesting thought about how to solve it. What do you think about interdictors being able to launch warp disruption probes, but only inside a faction warfare complex that an interdictor could normally enter? It's definitely not a hard counter to them warping away (they can MWD out of the bubble unless you land a proper tackle) but it certainly adds an element of risk to a playstyle that is currently (much like suicide ganking) very solved and very stagnant.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 58	Posted - 2015.02.07 02:08:32 - [43] - Quote Fugue Crow wrote: Chance is a big part of what got me rolling solo bomber PVP and helping to restore SergalJerk to its glory as the best small gang covert ops corp in the game. He's inspiring, he's charismatic, and he seems to have an attitude that suggests he really wants to improve the marketing of this game and get more players in. Glad to be of service! o7 Fugue Crow wrote: Do you think it's a good idea for suspicious activity that leads to setting up a gank to generate a suspect flag, which offers the opportunity for counterganking to become a playstyle? I am concerned the EVE codebase doesn't provide enough support for bump triggers -- plus there are so many interactions naturally at gates and stations that innocent players could get flagged without having done anything wrong. CCP's attempt to address this with their latest Higgs Anchoring Rigs is a step in the right direction: providing modules that give players ways to avoid bump-griefers (but still requires planning and trade-offs by capsuleers). I'd also like to see changes to the security standings system, though it's a very sensitive area and should be treated carefully. Fugue Crow wrote: By the way, I love your idea of a cloaking inhibitor. This would create a very interesting shift in playstyle - but there's one problem. Gate camps - and cloaking being one of the few ways to escape certain styles of bubble camps. This is a very good point and not something I had considered. Perhaps a more balanced structure would simply cause all cloaks to slowly draw more and more capacitor the longer someone is cloaked in system. So a transport passing through for a minute wouldn't really be affected, but an AFK player would be caught with his (stylish grimdark) pants down. Fugue Crow wrote: What do you think about interdictors being able to launch warp disruption probes, but only inside a faction warfare complex that an interdictor could normally enter? I literally know nothing about FW balance, so I can't really comment intelligently here! It sounds good in theory but it's also counterintuitive. I'd rather see CCP make changes to the way rewards are determined than to upend the meta entirely with a singular exception to longstanding rules about empire space. You've just read another amazing post by WiNGSPANTT, the 4th Best Commentator on YouTube! GÇï Follow along with my exploration and stealth bomber adventures on my YouTube channel
Ayiana Valerii Push Industries Push Interstellar Network 0	Posted - 2015.02.10 13:38:47 - [44] - Quote Bayonnefrog wrote: Look. Another CSM candidate who wants to be space famous. He is already space famous so, this is an invalid point. Can you find anything better to say? Maybe ask a question or something?
Orange Something Brave Wormholers New Signature 12	Posted - 2015.02.10 16:15:06 - [45] - Quote I like your down-to-earth-ness and lack of fear to try unconventional things. If your videos are any representation of what You'd bring to the CSM you've got my vote.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 65	Posted - 2015.02.10 17:17:31 - [46] - Quote Ayiana Valerii wrote: Bayonnefrog wrote: Look. Another CSM candidate who wants to be space famous. He is already space famous so, this is an invalid point. Can you find anything better to say? Maybe ask a question or something? This is a severe handicap when it comes to making deliveries in low/nullsec. You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
Gabriel Luis Falcoes Peregrinos DARKNESS. 14	Posted - 2015.02.11 00:30:00 - [47] - Quote +1 for Chance. Brought old vets back and is creating a lot of content. Tora Bushido wrote: You seem to be good at PR and marketing, but can you tell me what experience you have with Eve, how long you been playing the game and some opinions on hot Eve topics ? I'd rather trust that Chance will bring some new blood to the CSM then voting on you, Tora. justmy2cents Gabriel Luis > shooting goonies is pleasure, not business Tibalt Avalon > its tidi
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 66	Posted - 2015.02.11 02:47:11 - [48] - Quote Just a note everyone, I've updated my campaign post with some links, including a link to my recent interview with CapStable which includes a lot more detail about my thoughts, goals, and ideas. If you have a chance, check it out! You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
Alan Mathison EVE University Ivy League 44	Posted - 2015.02.11 16:01:33 - [49] - Quote Chance: Just wanted to mention that I think you hit it out of the park during your Cap Stable interview. The interview is what garnered my vote. I thought it was the best done of the last several. Your energy is undeniable, yet you present yourself quite well. I look very forward to seeing what you might be able to do. Thanks! -- Alan Mathison, Proud Sophmore, EVE University The YC117 CSM Election. VOTE! "Or I don't even wanna know you." CSM-X Candidates List: Jane Ting, Mike Azariah, Steve Ronukan, Xander Phoena, Sugar Kyle, Chance Ravinne, Dave Korhal.
Valkin Mordirc 625	Posted - 2015.02.12 06:16:19 - [50] - Quote Your stance on Wardecs in General is what would be the decided factor for my vote on you. Although I agree the system needs to change, there are a few things I would like to have addressed. For the most part you seem to under the belief that the 'Victims" Of a wardec are just that Victims. From my experience, rarely are defending corps often have several things in there advantage. The First and Foremost being numbers. Common decced entities like Brave Newbies, and the such, out number every Wardec Alliance corp out there. They lose massesively because focus is not applied to the Aggressors. But when they do put focus they end up kill a neat amount of ships. (Lookin at you Drop Bears) Other smaller corps often have the advantage of having the Aggressors having to come to them, in their home systems. Home system were the targets are have the ability to have a counter ready to undock. For the most part from what I've seen, The Victims of Wardecs are only Victims because they allow themselves to be the victim. There are exceptions. But if you create or corp made of sub 4 month players your bound to get hurt, Is that a problem with EvE in your eyes? EvE was built on the idea of actions should have reactions. With that, I ask, Do you feel that Wardecs are a problem due to Older players picking on younger Players? You use of Victims seems to make me seem so, Personally at least. Or do you believe it is underlying layer that belongs with the NPE and the tutorials not properly explaining things with detail? If you had free reign to change the Wardeccing system, How would do so? War dec Dodging, a corp closing once it is decced, and reforming with the same name, Do you feel this is an issue as it basically defeats the wardec feature as a whole? Or do you feel that Wardecs are unbalanced in the favor of the Deccer that it is a necessary need until the system can be reworked? Thanks for the response o/ `#DeleteTheWeak`

arsonist Igunen Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0	Posted - 2015.02.12 17:29:05 - [51] - Quote you're the reason I signed up for eve. and you're my ref. I knew the game since 2008/2009 and i had multiple trials in that time, but I've never had the chance to grasph the game. this is not a regular orc game- go kill rabbits and pick up gold. this you have to learn. for ever. thanks to you I'm flying nemesis and I'm doing fairly well.
Chance Ravinne WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 71	Posted - 2015.02.12 17:53:40 - [52] - Quote The wardec system is unintuitve because it allows someone to bribe CONCORD to look the other way, but doesn't (for some reason) allow the defenders to counter bribe CONCORD to protect them. Because of this, wars can be extended indefinitely even if the defending group has a gigantic fiscal advantage. Yes people can defend themselves, but they also have to humor troll wars that are declared by organizations with no intent of having a war against them in any military or financial sense. WINGSPAN could wardec 100 corps tomorrow then sit in w space, showing the pointlessness of this backward system. You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
KIller Wabbit The Scope Gallente Federation 863	Posted - 2015.02.12 20:04:57 - [53] - Quote Many have already expressed my reasons for endorsement, so simply - thumbs up! CCP .. always first with the wrong stuff CSM .. CCP Shills with a vacation plan
James HollowTooth Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2015.02.12 20:07:57 - [54] - Quote Deal Chance, I want to thank you for inspiring me to come back to the game with your YouTube videos. You have my vote. Best regards, 2beCuil
Nightfox BloodRaven State Protectorate Caldari State 29	Posted - 2015.02.12 21:37:07 - [55] - Quote I see many of u are questioning his experience as a pro.. or vet in the game... I dont think he is a good pvper or a pro.. but he creates content inspires fun.. as a solo pilot with 1600 kills.. i couldnt care less if he knows how the hit the right mod or has spent time in null with the power blocs or knows much about highsec wardeccing noob merc corps. All i care about is at the end of the day EVE is a game that when played should be fun and entertaining.. and a lot of vets have forgotten that. eve is a game for fun NOT A JOB or has a specific agenda to push for CSM... when i see his vids and what he is all about.. he is only person i believe that doesn't have a specific agenda and isnt a puppet for one of the factions. but a representative of just having a good time in a video game.. which is what eve should be about. That is why he 's got my vote.
Worldshatter Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective 0	Posted - 2015.02.12 22:25:12 - [56] - Quote While you clearly aren't what some would describe a "bittervet" I think that's a very good change from the traditional CSM layout. It's great to finally see a marketing guy step up to the mark and I'll certainly be considering you as my vote. Just a few questions. Considering that it has been deeply ingrained in people's minds that Eve is a "space sociopath spreadsheet simulator". How do you plan to go about dispelling the bad press that surrounds eve online? Do you intend to push for more traditional television advertisements or focus primarily on an internet audience? If you had to pick one thing to be emphasized more/at all in the tutorial what would it be and why? and finally Considering all those unclaimed PLEX's sitting in your account have you ever thought about making it space rain on unsuspecting newbros?
Valkin Mordirc 639	Posted - 2015.02.13 01:04:56 - [57] - Quote Chance Ravinne wrote: The wardec system is unintuitve because it allows someone to bribe CONCORD to look the other way, but doesn't (for some reason) allow the defenders to counter bribe CONCORD to protect them. Because of this, wars can be extended indefinitely even if the defending group has a gigantic fiscal advantage. Yes people can defend themselves, but they also have to humor troll wars that are declared by organizations with no intent of having a war against them in any military or financial sense. WINGSPAN could wardec 100 corps tomorrow then sit in w space, showing the pointlessness of this backward system. I would agree that it has problems but you haven't answered my questions, although changing an entier wardec system is a big one to answer, I will admit but, I'll shorten it down. Do you feel that Corp rolling should be allowed? Do you feel that the Wardec systems harms NPE? If so, How do you propose you fix it? Also, You are a younger player, I consider myself one as well, we both have one thing in common. You've explored for your entire time in EVE, I've been in the Merc/Wardec business my entire time in EVE. I know next to nothing about Sov Space, Lowsec, Indy, Mining and the such. I assume that it is about that same way for you. How do you feel competent enough to handled these topics as a CSM? `#DeleteTheWeak`
Astroia Tichim Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2015.02.13 01:50:01 - [58] - Quote Vote #1 - Chance Ravinne Vote #2 - Johnny Pew ??
WooMen ShuwOdair Odunen American Made Inc. Ushra'Khan 1	Posted - 2015.02.13 04:42:55 - [59] - Quote If you did your YouTube campaign video in Magneto's voice, I would consider even voting for you for president. You inspired me out of my bitter vet stagger. Thank You! If it's in EVE , then i probably shot at it at least once.
Instigo Pares EVE University Ivy League 0	Posted - 2015.02.13 08:46:32 - [60] - Quote Chance is high up on my ballot with this current platform. As someone who went though the NPE as a solo player, I think the only thing stopping me quitting was my extreme stubbornness. Any improvements to the NPE and tutorial will be positive for the game, and combined with improved marketing (This is Eve II! ) could improve the player numbers by a significant factor. One thing I would like to put out there is that all the marketing in the world won't work until there is a better NPE. 10 million people trying the game and quitting does nothing but put strain on the servers. But, if Chance sticks to this platform, he should absolutely be in your CSM shortlist.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.