How can it be inconsequential when you lose your ship everytime.

By losing 8 inconsequential ships to kill one very consequential ship.

How can it be inconsequential when you lose your ship everytime. That guy loses like 8 ships to kill one.

Those my friend are some consequences.

meaning that because he lost 8 of them he was punished very severely indeed.

"He" didn't lose eight of them. He lost one.

Unless you're accusing him of doing what CCP specifically banned just this month.

Mr Epeen

so.. hit f12 make a ticket. Done

Why should the hundred thousand odd accounts all submit a ticket on this exact same issue? Wont that clog up gm time? Shouldnt ccp just go
"Hey guys, we temp banned globby pending investigation. We then found out that he doesnt evade concord consequences, that this isnt the same as the boomarang exploit and what he did is within legal game mechanics, so we unbanned his accounts and told him he can continue Hyperganking if he likes."

Cuz thats what happened. If they said it was illegal, he wouldnt be unbanned nor doing it again.

Its definatley legal if they remain quiet and he keeps it up after they obviously unbanned him on purpose after investigation.

LOL WORKONG AS INTENDED CAREBEARS. SUCK IT

lol, Carebears run eve. Without carebears there is no pvp... think about it. Unless you want to play rookie ship online and have nothing to fight over

The real problem here is that this guy can use an alt to perma-bump the large ship forever and all he had to do was shoot with a fresh ship every 15 minutes to keep him from logging off. Totally broken. I don't care how epic you think your mission is here, but no one can say current log-off/bump/concord mechanics are ok.

Afk ratting in null brings more minerals and ships than hisec miners and missioners and freighters dude. Game would survive just fine without despite my entire joy in life and reason for being is to grief and destroy them.... Agent Smith said "there are levels of survival we are willing to adapt too" or something like that bout killimg all all the humans in matrix even tho they "needed" them.

Theres no way to fix bumping dude. Its been debated for literaly years. No good solution. Also IF THE DUDE WASNT AFK /HAD FRIENDS HE WOULDNT DIE. This tactic basivally needs afk/logged off freighter.

That is the dumbest thing I ever heard... Your argument is that Carebears don't run the game because people shooting red crosses in null sec is just as good... when in fact that is a carebear activity, one of the safest in the game.

By the way, those station eggs you will be doing all that "non-carebear" ship building in had to be built from materials somewhere.

The fact of this game is, without someone to make your ammo, research your bpo's, invent T2, haul the goods, make the goods and provide your ships there is no game.

All you guys are accomplishing is justifying the calls for nerfs to suicide ganking, and making high-sec even more carebear. If you want to gank a freighter, get 30 friends, don't be a jerk and do it using exploits.


Edit: How exactly does this guy counter the move of bumping alt and recycling cats to gank? He can't log off, he cant align and he cant get back to a gate... he is dead no matter what unless he can get a webbing alt and time his warp out.

That is the dumbest thing I ever heard... Your argument is that Carebears don't run the game because people shooting red crosses in null sec is just as good... when in fact that is a carebear activity, one of the safest in the game.

By the way, those station eggs you will be doing all that "non-carebear" ship building in had to be built from materials somewhere.

The fact of this game is, without someone to make your ammo, research your bpo's, invent T2, haul the goods, make the goods and provide your ships there is no game.

Do you whine because it uses ammo to kill a ship, too?

Of course not. It's the cost of shooting things and you factor it in.

Just like the gank ship is a factored in cost. Think of it as a bigger piece of ammo. And just as inconsequential.

Mr Epeen

link to reddit thread about avoiding the brunt of concords impact in highsec

Apperantly a Guy banned for using a technique that allowd him to ignore the full effect of Concorde punishment to gank in highsec has been unbanned and is currently continuing to use this technique to bank ppl with no defender possible "due to mechanics".

Ccp please do Something About this, otherwise if this gets widespread you might as Well remove freighters and bowheads from highsec.

Do you whine because it uses ammo to kill a ship, too?

Of course not. It's the cost of shooting things and you factor it in.

Just like the gank ship is a factored in cost. Think of it as a bigger piece of ammo. And just as inconsequential.

Mr Epeen

... drink coffee before posting ...