Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
167
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 23:56:28 -
[1] - Quote
Hello,
IGÇÖm Migui XGÇÖhyrrn or how everyone else calls me, Migui (yeah donGÇÖt try to pronounce my last name and I happen to own the character named GÇ£MiguiGÇ¥). IGÇÖm a 30 years old physicist from Spain and I have been playing since summer 2011, with Incarna.
I joined nullsec early on my career and starting getting involved with in-alliance business, organization and leadership for Test Alliance Please Ignore and as such, IGÇÖm currently TEST Head Diplomat and Financial Director.
My activities in game have been primarily economically-based, I grow a lot of ISK by trading in highsec and nullsec and ended spending a good chunk of it in an Avatar class ship to help my alliance with logistics.
I forged my own way in EVE and I have been trying since then to help my community, mainly the Spanish speaking people in help channels and such. I own a Spanish fansite (https://fleetdontjump.com/) with EVE articles and guides to help a bit to ease the learning curve down because yeah, EVE is a really harsh place to be alone.
I do like huge alliance warfare and I am aware of a number of issues about 0.0, lowsec and the game as a whole. When I grow up I want to become a great pvper. I do enjoy ship explosions, but I tend to die a lot.
As part of my alliance and coalition leadership that are both very newbro-friendly I know a number of issues with how EVE works as a whole and I think I have some proposals to improve it.
IGÇÖm not going to play the GÇ£aww everything for the cute newbrosGÇ¥ card because I think that MalcaniGÇÖs law is flawless.
So let me put some of my ideas to you in order to explain a bit what I would like to see in EVE Online.
Integration with the EVE Online community: finding your place in EVE
EVE is not that complicated if you receive the right guidance. However, if one goes it alone (as so many players that get lured in from articles about EveGÇÖs epic spaceship battles do) Eve is a harsh, confusing and ultimately unpleasant place to be. I like to think that the gametruly is a massive multiPLAYER because it stresses that the game is meant to be played with others: players are not just scenery; they are there to help you but also to shoot you, scam you and exploit you ruthlessly. If you are alone, you die. If you find your pack, you will have a blast and you will be in love with EVE.
This is a point that, to date, EVE has failed to accomplish. We are content with the stereotypical image of the learning curve and we simply assume that EVE needs to be a harsh place because its part of its essence.
And while I do agree that EVE needs to remain a hostile place where you have to mind your steps, this doesnGÇÖt need to be the same thing as letting someone go through the tutorials and then completely clueless about what to do in this game.
My experience is that unless you fall into the right hands, you will leave the game bored and probably frustrated. Maybe you have a chance next time but it is frustrating that the community loses that many people.
This year, 6 million of trial accounts were deleted. 6 million of chars that were left to rot over the course of 11 years. Thats a lot of people that never went past the first few days. Why is that?
Newbros in highsec tend to be very focused to use PLEX as a way to play the game GÇ£for freeGÇ¥ and they make this their goal, wasting their precious time grinding ISK. EVE is not a game of grinding, or it shouldnGÇÖt be at least. Thats why most people end mining or running missions, because they are completely clueless about the immense world that is awaiting for them just outside.
I do think that EVE should provide the opportunity to see what is going on before deciding what are you going to do with your life as a capsuleer. Many people will be scared of losing their assets, but what if the players were shown how cool can be a huge fleet in low/0.0/w-space, or small gang, or running sites? We need to showcase what EVE can offer better.
LetGÇÖs make their lives more exciting. LetGÇÖs make them richer and more skilled so we can farm them better in the future. LetGÇÖs not make EVE dumber or easier, simply draw a line in the ground to tell them where they could be if the put one foot after the other.
I like explosions. I respect people that donGÇÖt like explosions. I donGÇÖt want them to be safer than I am but I want to make it fun for almost everyone involved.
Lore involvement within the actual gameplay, NPCs matter
While I think that the whole Circadian seekers and Thera stuff is very cool and a nice step into the right direction, I think that EVE lore is amazing but very poorly implemented into actual events that take place in EVE.
I have always imagined epic empire wars, the mighty Jove showing their power, even the mysterious sleepers or the pirate factions.
One thing that I would like to propose is the possibility of being affiliated with a pirate faction. Either being born to it or simply by swearing loyalty to them and maybe getting particular missions or objectives within 0.0 npc or maybe even lowsec or wormhole space.
Instead of making the same lvl4 mission for the 10000th time, why not go to the other side of the universe to kill your factionGÇÖs arch-nemesis or help your pirate buddies to kill enemies (be they rats or other players).
I feel that the lore is full of possibilities and the best place for this would be 0.0 npc. But this needs a better 0.0 npc, more pockets distributed all around the galaxy with more Thera-like systems and such.
(continues) |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
167
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 23:57:07 -
[2] - Quote
Bring battlecruisers and battleships into the game again
2014 has been the year of Ishtars and assorted T3GÇÖs, mainly because the warp changes made it unfun to roam around in battlecruisers or larger and the medium micro jump drives never solved anything.(be specific as to how mjdGÇÖs didnGÇÖt fix anything)
Battleships simply die too easily to bombs, so we are now stuck with a couple of valid and overused ships to fly for our doctrines that are putting us back to the days before the tiericide.
Ishtars need to be nerfed. You are a fast T2 cruiser, with big resists and little risk of dying if you arenGÇÖt messing around. Drones can be bombed out of the field, but they are very effective to the point that other doctrines have been built to specifically be anti-Ishtar fleets.
Some people may argue that battlecruisers arenGÇÖt broken because one fit in particular is effective, or that they are meant to be used in this way. I would love to go back to 2012 where Nagas were amazing to fly around, you would stumble upon Talos gangs, Tornados were all around camping gates, and so on. They were overpowered? Well, maybe the other alternatives werenGÇÖt good either.
Battleships stopped being the amazing ships they were. Its like post 1945 era, when torpedo delivering and bomb diving aircraft outdated the battleships. So we either find a way to make battleships less prone to die horribly or simply nerf how good bombs are in terms of effectiveness versus risk. (Possibly mention how the ISBoxer change affected this?)
I wonGÇÖt nerf bombs or covert ops to the ground because they are very fun ships to fly and we need them around. We will find a way to use them effectively in game and being OP without making the rest of the bigger ships utterly useless. But I do think that for every mechanic you can take advantage of, there should be a counter.
Make EVE Online a more dynamic world, with less bot-like activities
Mining, missions, and marketing. What do all these things have in common? They can be done mindlessly in a few steps until the end of days.
I am not against miners or anything, I would like to make their game a bit more fun. IGÇÖve found that many miners improve their game to not play the game. They set up everything to alt-tab to netflix and such. Mining could become as profitable as ninja-gas mining in wormholes if there was a bit of spice added to the equation.
Basically I would like to see bots out of EVE, and while this is very difficult to achieve, making certain activities less based in repeating stuff over and over and over could help to fix this while you improve the overall gaming experience.
Economy overhaul for alliances from the linemember to coalition warfare
One of my concerns as an alliance director is that my people are happy and have money. Because unhappy and poor people are less prone to fly better ships and without better ships you canGÇÖt accomplish strategic objectives because you are outgamed in no time.
I find that EVE is way too poor in this particular aspect. Alliances have little margin to make money: you either have moons or renters. And all these resources are already taken and/or depend on where you live.
I was there when we discussed and then signed the agreement about occupancy based sov so I pretty much agree with it. I want to think like space is a living place that rewards you for taking care of it.
So I am going to propose to get rid of the old true security system that determines the number of spawns of anomalies and the quality of ores that you find in belts. Also, I want to have moongoo evenly spread through nullsec and lowsec, so that it is very unlikely for a group of players to control the market over certain item but also to help in local t2 production, because alchemy alone cannot cope with the demands if you plan to invest heavily into this.
We can talk about low-end bottleneck and such, but I think industry in 0.0/lowsec needs to be watched carefully before jumping into conclusions. I am aware of a number of problems related with this.
EVE has become a larger place since Phoebe, but we still depend a lot in highsec logistics because there are a number of bottlenecks that prevent us from making prosper states.
By getting rid of true security I would tie the quality of anomalies to other things. For example, sov indexes and occupancy. Lets say, the more you use the space the better it becomes. The more people you have within a constellation, the better the anomalies, chances of officer spawns, etc. Even more, true security could be tied to this activity so it would fluctuate with time, within certain values.
We could tie this to the lore: GÇ£Hey, we are pirates trying to make a living here and this motherf* comes to murder us like all the time, lets counter-attack them!GÇ¥
This way, we would get rid of GÇ£Ha, you live in that ****** region no one wants, and IGÇÖm sitting here piling up ISKGÇ¥. This could even out the things a lot for alliances that havenGÇÖt been there for years and have everything already figured out.
I donGÇÖt want to take anything from anyoneGÇÖs hands because IGÇÖm pretty sure everyone worked hard to get them. I want to even out the things by helping those that donGÇÖt have that option.
We might be able to set up alliance level taxes for some stuff. I am not a fan of milking our people but maybe a little tax could help the finances, specifically if you are starting over after losing a big war or something like that :)
(continues) |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
167
|
Posted - 2015.01.28 23:57:58 -
[3] - Quote
Lowsec is life, lowsec is love
Outside factional warfare and a handful of systems that happen to be active because of their location, lowsec is mostly empty. And it is empty because there is no reason to stay there, you get better things in nullsec or you get safer things and arguably better in highsec.
Lowsec needs a purpose in EVE Online. Probably moving all lvl4GÇÖs would be way too extreme, but what about creating new fun content for lowsec, as a new kind of missions tied to the lore or anomalies that only exist there and that are actually worth it to run.
Overhaul of corporation and alliance management, just some little annoying things
Roles, shares, kicking inactive people, etc. If you have experience with the corporation management tab and/or alliance, I feel your pain. This needs a serious rework.
I want to be able to activate a GÇ£kick if inactive after X monthsGÇ¥ maybe unless that guy has some particular role to prevent deceased members or other special cases being kicked. IGÇÖm sure that huge corps will like this.
Shares are the key either to evict your CEO or to save your corp if your CEO is in jail. Either way, in a game where trust is that important, shares are too powerful.
Better standings management. I want to have the possibility to define better what +2.5 means and what +5.0 gets you and the same thing for -5.0 or -10.0. And possibly the notification of standing changes towards your corp or alliance.
Integration between different cultures/languages
EVE Online has a ton of people from all around the world. As a Spaniard, I have found that not having a version for my fellow Latin American and Spaniard friends is a big wall in front of them to try out the game and play it. Many of them like the idea but canGÇÖt get involved because of language barriers.
I am perfectly aware that translating the game is a long term investment for the company and it is not a straight decision to take if numbers arenGÇÖt good, based on promises.
I would like to get rid of this problem by tying (at least some of) the character strings to a local file or maybe an overview-like file stored in the server. And then, having the possibility of submitting translations. This could be managed by a subversion or something like that, where people proposes the translation, gets voted and ends being submitted for a final preview.
This way we would get quality translations for free, the company would get rid of legal issues that might arise with the translation, and we would bring the game to anyone around the globe that wants to join the fun.
Sov revamp, legacy code aka POSes and such
If CCP SeagullGÇÖs roadmap is accurate we will be getting more info about CCP plans at Fanfest 2015.
As I said before, I signed the occupancy-sov proposal so there is that. I do like the GÇ£El diginGÇÖs solutionGÇ¥ back in a few months ago.
Well I have more ideas but this is a draft. You may ask me anything you would like to know. Thanks for reading.
Also I will be doing an AMA in r/evedreddit. |

Leonis Perthshire
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
10
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:01:19 -
[4] - Quote
Nice +1
GÇ£If you win, you live. If you lose, you die. If you donGÇÖt fight, you canGÇÖt win!GÇ¥ GÇô Eren Jaeger
White Maul
|

Nick Moretti
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
19
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:02:27 -
[5] - Quote
+1 I like your platform, will most likely have my first vote :3 |

Acid Katelo
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:03:09 -
[6] - Quote
Vote for Migui! |

Poopicus Butts
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:06:11 -
[7] - Quote
Best Diplo EU +1 |

Fletcher Kanewald
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:14:08 -
[8] - Quote
I have a lot of respect for you, Migui, and I'm glad to see you running.
+1 from me. |

Ayzian
W-Space IT Department Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 00:29:37 -
[9] - Quote
A vote for Migui is a vote for progress. +1 |

Danila Vagilov
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 02:02:48 -
[10] - Quote
10/10 would vote for |
|

Bhock
Alea Iacta Est Universal Brave Collective
17
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 05:18:21 -
[11] - Quote
My name is Bhock and I am one of the contributor of the Capstable Podcast.
In early 2014 our podcast interviewed a great majority of the candidates for CSM9 and we will be doing the same for CSM10.
Here is our announcement: http://capstable.net/2014/12/01/council-of-stellar-management-x-call-for-candidate-interviews/
As we stated in the announcement, you can contact us to schedule your one on one interview via any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected] Twitter: @CapStable Or via our contact form
We look forward to speaking to you about your particular skill set and expertise in EVE Online and we hope you success in your candidacy.
Sincerely,
Bhock Contributor of the Capstable Podcast |

Wiros PotHead
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
13
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 07:40:17 -
[12] - Quote
His blog was one of the first that dragged me into eve, you have my respect as a player and one of my votes.
GÇ£This is war. You never want to fight fair. You want to sneak up behind your enemy and club him over the head.GÇ¥
GÇô Kara Thrace aka "Starbuck" -á
|

Joseph Adamamada
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 12:14:54 -
[13] - Quote
I like. |

Tiberian Deci
Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore
31
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 13:31:58 -
[14] - Quote
Can't say enough about how much thought Migui puts into decisions before making them. From inttra-alliance drama to disagreements with coalition mates, Migui is often there listening to everything and giving it all equal weight before arriving at a decision, and I have never seen him come to a conclusion soley based (or even influenced by) someone's corp or alliance ticker. He gets all my votes. |

Tanya Magnussen
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 13:33:40 -
[15] - Quote
+1 |

Turb0 Egg
Diplomatic Hazard
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 13:36:30 -
[16] - Quote
+1 |

Avengor Scorsese
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 14:43:44 -
[17] - Quote
+1, no question. |

Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
321
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 15:05:56 -
[18] - Quote
You'll have my vote |

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1741
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 15:16:06 -
[19] - Quote
not voting for you solely because of your view on mining. miners HAVE the game they want, a way to progress or socialize with buddies in EVE while at work or otherwise preoccupied with life on a second screen. Changing mining to be more "active" based would just force miners to sit there and stare at the rocks for hours on end, rather than engage with friends or paperwork.
in other words, you hate miners and want them to be slaves to minigames. no thank you, not supported, never ever, nope. |

Tiberian Deci
Sleeper Slumber Party Test Alliance Please Ignore
31
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 15:22:52 -
[20] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:not voting for you solely because of your view on mining. miners HAVE the game they want, a way to progress or socialize with buddies in EVE while at work or otherwise preoccupied with life on a second screen. Changing mining to be more "active" based would just force miners to sit there and stare at the rocks for hours on end, rather than engage with friends or paperwork.
in other words, you hate miners and want them to be slaves to minigames. no thank you, not supported, never ever, nope.
Not trying to be a ****, but you realize that you can both mine and socialize with buddies at the same time. I used to be a highsec miner and I did it. If you're mad because this may make it harder for you to play a game while you're at work, all I can say is I want your job.
|
|

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
197
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 16:45:54 -
[21] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:not voting for you solely because of your view on mining. miners HAVE the game they want, a way to progress or socialize with buddies in EVE while at work or otherwise preoccupied with life on a second screen. Changing mining to be more "active" based would just force miners to sit there and stare at the rocks for hours on end, rather than engage with friends or paperwork.
in other words, you hate miners and want them to be slaves to minigames. no thank you, not supported, never ever, nope.
I don't hate miners. I was one myself and I have many miner friends that I respect. Eve is a sandbox there are not ways of playing it more legit than others. We can argue about certain aspects on how to optimize particular ways of playing to maximize the benefits for example.
Don't want them out, murdered or anything but I think that mining makes new people stuck themselves and missing a huge part of the game which is sad.
I think that Eve is a living thing and I want that you have to be there to max the benefits. What's the point in having 20 accounts to play the game without playing the game. Socialize? I'm a diplomat, politics is what I do. Docked or using external programs.
Do you want to mine while you are not there? For hours just because it is a very poor way of making Isk?
I'd rather improve the benefits per hour while making it less likely to be the Paradise of betting.
I haven't said anything about mini games though.
Eve needs to start making sure that risk Vs benefit becomes true. |

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1744
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 20:45:09 -
[22] - Quote
Tiberian Deci wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:not voting for you solely because of your view on mining. miners HAVE the game they want, a way to progress or socialize with buddies in EVE while at work or otherwise preoccupied with life on a second screen. Changing mining to be more "active" based would just force miners to sit there and stare at the rocks for hours on end, rather than engage with friends or paperwork.
in other words, you hate miners and want them to be slaves to minigames. no thank you, not supported, never ever, nope. Not trying to be a ****, but you realize that you can both mine and socialize with buddies at the same time right? I used to be a highsec miner and I did it and it wasn't difficult at all. If you're mad because this may make it harder for you to play a game while you're at work, all I can say is I want your job. its not just at work, its i dont want to be trying to find time to type in chat while having to play some absurd minigame EVERY LAST ONE of these "improve mining" ideas turn into. |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
197
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 20:51:59 -
[23] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:[its not just at work, its i dont want to be trying to find time to type in chat while having to play some absurd minigame EVERY LAST ONE of these "improve mining" ideas turn into.
Basically everything that can be trivially escalated horizontally has to be reworked. Banning broadcasting in ISBoxer was the best thing ever.
Do you want to mine AFK? Ok, so be it but if you mine and pay attention, you should get rewarded accordingly.
|

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1746
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 21:47:59 -
[24] - Quote
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:[its not just at work, its i dont want to be trying to find time to type in chat while having to play some absurd minigame EVERY LAST ONE of these "improve mining" ideas turn into. Basically everything that can be trivially escalated horizontally has to be reworked. Banning broadcasting in ISBoxer was the best thing ever. Do you want to mine AFK? Ok, so be it but if you mine and pay attention, you should get rewarded accordingly. so ask yourself, how do you see making mining actually FUN with any mechanic, considering they will be doing the exact same thing say, 500-1000 times a day if they are "active".
this would drive OUT more miners than it would attract, mining AFK or not (and im not saying i want to mine AFK, just be able to focus on chatting in the chat boxes instead of being forced to play the same interaction over and over and over again on screen. its the primary reason why I, and most miners, mine instead of mission) |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
200
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 22:36:57 -
[25] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote: so ask yourself, how do you see making mining actually FUN with any mechanic, considering they will be doing the exact same thing say, 500-1000 times a day if they are "active".
this would drive OUT more miners than it would attract, mining AFK or not (and im not saying i want to mine AFK, just be able to focus on chatting in the chat boxes instead of being forced to play the same interaction over and over and over again on screen. its the primary reason why I, and most miners, mine instead of mission)
Most newbie miners, according to my experience in multiple helping channels and so on, mine because they know nothing else and they think that mining is a good way to make ISK. It actually isn't. I don't want to get rid of miners, again. I want that newbros aren't stuck in mining since their first day because the game pushes you to do that. Mine if you like that. Stay docked if you like that. Its up to you. Your game, your choice.
Things that scalate horizontally that easily are the heaven for botters. And we must get rid of botters.
I think that risk vs reward and staying at the keyboard are important things for a ONLINE game. You are not part of the scenery. You are a player, alive and you should be there playing the game. Also, this doesn't mean that you should be forced to pay 150% of attention to mine like every second so you don't have even a second to type in chat. Between black and white there are many scales of grey.
Migui is running for CSM10!
|

Fletcher Kanewald
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2015.01.29 22:40:35 -
[26] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:[its not just at work, its i dont want to be trying to find time to type in chat while having to play some absurd minigame EVERY LAST ONE of these "improve mining" ideas turn into. Basically everything that can be trivially escalated horizontally has to be reworked. Banning broadcasting in ISBoxer was the best thing ever. Do you want to mine AFK? Ok, so be it but if you mine and pay attention, you should get rewarded accordingly. so ask yourself, how do you see making mining actually FUN with any mechanic, considering they will be doing the exact same thing say, 500-1000 times a day if they are "active". this would drive OUT more miners than it would attract, mining AFK or not (and im not saying i want to mine AFK, just be able to focus on chatting in the chat boxes instead of being forced to play the same interaction over and over and over again on screen. its the primary reason why I, and most miners, mine instead of mission)
I find it rather odd you admit you don't find an activity fun, yet you continuously do said activity and vehemently oppose any proposed changes to it. You're admitting you want to play EVE by not playing the game and doing something else. Please think about that for a couple of minutes. |

Darius Twins
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 00:56:21 -
[27] - Quote
+1 |

Lord Drakandu
Piratas Leprosos Guineanos Blood Raider's Corsairs
10
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 11:49:26 -
[28] - Quote
Migui is an excellent player who understands and respects the different roles in the game. The gaming community will be well represented eve online if is elected. |

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1752
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 13:01:05 -
[29] - Quote
Fletcher Kanewald wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:[its not just at work, its i dont want to be trying to find time to type in chat while having to play some absurd minigame EVERY LAST ONE of these "improve mining" ideas turn into. Basically everything that can be trivially escalated horizontally has to be reworked. Banning broadcasting in ISBoxer was the best thing ever. Do you want to mine AFK? Ok, so be it but if you mine and pay attention, you should get rewarded accordingly. so ask yourself, how do you see making mining actually FUN with any mechanic, considering they will be doing the exact same thing say, 500-1000 times a day if they are "active". this would drive OUT more miners than it would attract, mining AFK or not (and im not saying i want to mine AFK, just be able to focus on chatting in the chat boxes instead of being forced to play the same interaction over and over and over again on screen. its the primary reason why I, and most miners, mine instead of mission) I find it rather odd you admit you don't find an activity fun, yet you continuously do said activity and vehemently oppose any proposed changes to it. You're admitting you want to play EVE by not playing the game and doing something else. Please think about that for a couple of minutes. Im saying I want an option in EVE for me to do to have minimal progression on days I otherwis wouldnt be able to play. Say Im told theres a major shipment coming through the airport, and Im stuck on an extra 6 hour shift, there goes my EVE time entirely for the day as i sit around an office typing up papers, but with mining, I can at least make a LITTLE isk while chatting with friends and doing business work, so I can afford a couple frigs for a weekend roam when im NOT at work.
most of the people who mine do it because they play during scenarios like this. EVE is supposed to offer a chocie for ALL play styles, mining is for the minimal interaction minimal profit playstyle, people who want to be logged in, undocked, at risk, but not required to pay 100% attention to the game just to proceed. |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
208
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 15:12:13 -
[30] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote: I can at least make a LITTLE isk while chatting with friends and doing business work, so I can afford a couple frigs for a weekend roam when im NOT at work..
And I'm not against that like I already explained. But I think that people paying attention should get more.
Migui is running for CSM10!
|
|

ZheoTheThird
Hoover Inc. Pandemic Legion
243
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 15:21:21 -
[31] - Quote
+1, excellent guy with excellent ideas |

Dodo Veetee
Dixon Cox Butte Preservation Society Black Legion.
21
|
Posted - 2015.01.30 16:05:25 -
[32] - Quote
+1
you get my vote |

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1756
|
Posted - 2015.01.31 18:14:03 -
[33] - Quote
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote: I can at least make a LITTLE isk while chatting with friends and doing business work, so I can afford a couple frigs for a weekend roam when im NOT at work.. And I'm not against that like I already explained. But I think that people paying attention should get more. but thats not how supply and demand works, you either drastically nerf semi-passive mining's rate to the point its not worth doing so people will actually DO the active version, or you make the active version several magnitudes more "valuable", but since this is just grabbing resources, it will just increase the mineral influx, driving down all the prices, until the active version is at the same if not slightly above current, and the passive is no longer able to make any income whatsoever.
remember gun mining? that was basically the "pay attention and get more minerals than regular mining" option, CCP removed it because it ended up being a significant source of minerals, and a primary reason why mining was such ****** income then to begin with. |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
216
|
Posted - 2015.01.31 19:06:16 -
[34] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote: but thats not how supply and demand works, you either drastically nerf semi-passive mining's rate to the point its not worth doing so people will actually DO the active version, or you make the active version several magnitudes more "valuable", but since this is just grabbing resources, it will just increase the mineral influx, driving down all the prices, until the active version is at the same if not slightly above current, and the passive is no longer able to make any income whatsoever.
remember gun mining? that was basically the "pay attention and get more minerals than regular mining" option, CCP removed it because it ended up being a significant source of minerals, and a primary reason why mining was such ****** income then to begin with.
I'm pretty sure that when CCP banned broadcasting many people came up to the same conclussion: oh, now that multiboxing miners aren't reliable in huge scale, the market is going to be damaged! EVE is going to die!
Pretty much the same when ice belts were removed, etc. The reality is that people will adapt to new mechanics and will always find a way to take advantage of them.
Removing botting from EVE is very important. And be on the screen should always be more rewarding than not. In highsec you simply are a drop in an ocean of horrible tanked mackinaws that are going to die in a 0.5 so you feel safer.
Ninja-gas mining in a c6 with a week old venture can net you more ISK than mining with a full skilled mackinaw per hour. Of course risk is much bigger.
Migui is running for CSM10!
|

Indivil
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
5
|
Posted - 2015.02.01 08:54:30 -
[35] - Quote
Migui for president! +1 |

Lomgrim
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 04:23:19 -
[36] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote: I can at least make a LITTLE isk while chatting with friends and doing business work, so I can afford a couple frigs for a weekend roam when im NOT at work.. And I'm not against that like I already explained. But I think that people paying attention should get more. but thats not how supply and demand works, you either drastically nerf semi-passive mining's rate to the point its not worth doing so people will actually DO the active version, or you make the active version several magnitudes more "valuable", but since this is just grabbing resources, it will just increase the mineral influx, driving down all the prices, until the active version is at the same if not slightly above current, and the passive is no longer able to make any income whatsoever. remember gun mining? that was basically the "pay attention and get more minerals than regular mining" option, CCP removed it because it ended up being a significant source of minerals, and a primary reason why mining was such ****** income then to begin with.
UNless active version comes with some added perk that has direct implication on just simple "resource" grabbing mechanism. in either way, the idea isnt to maintain the status quo of the market, but rather to make sure that active mining is able to compete with an army of bots, at which points, yes, chances are they will be on equal footing in terms of raw market impact, but the difference is taht a newbro flying a venture actively mining might be able to keep up with 2 botted accounts afk-mining.
Also, migui +1 |

Zadinliar Kondur
Uranus Intruders Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 08:13:59 -
[37] - Quote
Vote for Migui! +1 |

Johnathan Severasse
Dixon Cox Butte Preservation Society Black Legion.
86
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 17:48:28 -
[38] - Quote
+1
Good guy |

Fran Riko
Nan Roig
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 15:58:21 -
[39] - Quote
+1 |

Bolur Freir
Rubella Solaris Test Alliance Please Ignore
15
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 04:12:43 -
[40] - Quote
Lomgrim wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Migui X'hyrrn wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote: I can at least make a LITTLE isk while chatting with friends and doing business work, so I can afford a couple frigs for a weekend roam when im NOT at work.. And I'm not against that like I already explained. But I think that people paying attention should get more. but thats not how supply and demand works, you either drastically nerf semi-passive mining's rate to the point its not worth doing so people will actually DO the active version, or you make the active version several magnitudes more "valuable", but since this is just grabbing resources, it will just increase the mineral influx, driving down all the prices, until the active version is at the same if not slightly above current, and the passive is no longer able to make any income whatsoever. remember gun mining? that was basically the "pay attention and get more minerals than regular mining" option, CCP removed it because it ended up being a significant source of minerals, and a primary reason why mining was such ****** income then to begin with. UNless active version comes with some added perk that has direct implication on just simple "resource" grabbing mechanism. in either way, the idea isnt to maintain the status quo of the market, but rather to make sure that active mining is able to compete with an army of bots, at which points, yes, chances are they will be on equal footing in terms of raw market impact, but the difference is taht a newbro flying a venture actively mining might be able to keep up with 2 botted accounts afk-mining. Also, migui +1
I agree, there's no reason to remove the afk mining but an active play style should have increased reward.
Migui is awesome +1 |
|

Ikadz
The Thought Gang
11
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 20:29:33 -
[41] - Quote
I'm one of those newbies who stayed at Eve because of his help at first stages.
+1 |

Baal Zebud
Uranus Intruders Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 15:52:54 -
[42] - Quote
Have known Migui ingame for a while and can-¦t think of a better CSM candidate.
+1 |

Fletcher Kanewald
Jump Drive Appreciation Society Test Alliance Please Ignore
5
|
Posted - 2015.02.10 01:56:20 -
[43] - Quote
What do you think should be done about the New Player Experience to help with player retention? You mentioned not wanting new players to grind for PLEX to sub their accounts, but you didn't say much else about the NPE. |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
222
|
Posted - 2015.02.10 17:54:04 -
[44] - Quote
Fletcher Kanewald wrote:What do you think should be done about the New Player Experience to help with player retention? You mentioned not wanting new players to grind for PLEX to sub their accounts, but you didn't say much else about the NPE.
I think that players should use the trial to actually try the game. The metagaming is so hard that we aren't likely going to let trials in in most corps or alliances, sadly. But this said, the tutorials or something else should have a way to showcase the game better to the newbros.
EVE is a dynamic place, it is not only killing the same rat a million times before you are done, it is not only about rocks. Many newbros are fooled into thinking that missions and mining are the best thing to earn money as a newbro, and they stick with that until they give up because grinding 800M as a newbro is hard.
But there is a lot of stuff just to try out there. Why aren't we showing them? Exploration, wormholes, ninja-gas mining, even getting eyes over one of those huge fights that come up into the social media, whatever. EVE is a real living thing, made up by players, it breathes and it is amazing, but we have to show them how amazing it can be without having to wait weeks or months or forever until they suddenly make into a corp that does that kind of stuff.
EVE is a game about meaningful decisions but you can't decide without knowledge and without anything to compare. Take a newbro into nullsec. Have him die to a gatecamp. Give him another ship and teach them to be careful. Show them to use dscan and stuff to venture into the deep space without being completely alone or relying into having luck.
New Player Experience is showing them why we love this game despite all the huge wall that the learning curve is. We don't need a flat learning curve either, but many things can be improved the first two weeks of a character that can dramatically change the decision to subscribe or to leave forever because "Lol grinding internet spreadsheets online" etc.
Migui is running for CSM10!
|

StupidGenius Charante
Alea Iacta Est Universal Brave Collective
10
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 18:16:43 -
[45] - Quote
I saw down and spoke with Migui X'hyrrn for the Cap Stable's CSM X interview series, listen here: http://capstable.net/2015/02/15/migui-xhyrrn/ |

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
223
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 18:26:43 -
[46] - Quote
Thank you guys!
Migui is running for CSM10!
|

Pintxito Sasen
Mineria y Manufactura Titan
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 20:55:57 -
[47] - Quote
+1 |

Jasmine Deer
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 09:23:51 -
[48] - Quote
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:
I don't hate miners.
Don't want them out, murdered or anything but I think that mining makes new people stuck themselves and missing a huge part of the game which is sad.
Do you want to mine while you are not there? For hours just because it is a very poor way of making Isk?
Well that sure is a relief.
Knowing you don't want miners "out, murdered or anything". Right now I'm feeling the sort of gratitude that was likely felt by lepers in medieval times on hearing the new local lord wasn't going to burn down their camp and drive them over a cliff and into the sea.
And go right ahead promoting the idea that miners spend all their time magically mining afk for hours on end. The secret must be in one of those guides to making isk in Eve I keep seeing ads for.
No one I know has ever subscribed to Eve because they got all excited about being a miner. But a lot of people do get drawn in because of the opportunity make stuff. Some of those folks like to make stuff in small groups or on their own and derive pleasure from resource gathering themselves and that requires a LOT of time spent mining. But when you've churned out your manufactured item the mining grind seems worth it and whether as a corp, group or individual you get to experience a real sense of achievement.
Oh, and believe it or not a lot of us miners do things other than mine. This is my 10th year in Eve and I'm still happy. So no need feel sad on my behalf
:)
|

Migui X'hyrrn
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
223
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 11:05:57 -
[49] - Quote
Jasmine Deer wrote:Migui X'hyrrn wrote:
I don't hate miners.
Don't want them out, murdered or anything but I think that mining makes new people stuck themselves and missing a huge part of the game which is sad.
Do you want to mine while you are not there? For hours just because it is a very poor way of making Isk?
Well that sure is a relief. Knowing you don't want miners "out, murdered or anything". Right now I'm feeling the sort of gratitude that was likely felt by lepers in medieval times on hearing the new local lord wasn't going to burn down their camp and drive them over a cliff and into the sea. And go right ahead promoting the idea that miners spend all their time magically mining afk for hours on end. The secret must be in one of those guides to making isk in Eve I keep seeing ads for. No one I know has ever subscribed to Eve because they got all excited about being a miner. But a lot of people do get drawn in because of the opportunity make stuff. Some of those folks like to make stuff in small groups or on their own and derive pleasure from resource gathering themselves and that requires a LOT of time spent mining. But when you've churned out your manufactured item the mining grind seems worth it and whether as a corp, group or individual you get to experience a real sense of achievement. Oh, and believe it or not a lot of us miners do things other than mine. This is my 10th year in Eve and I'm still happy. So no need feel sad on my behalf :)
I don't get why some of you keep trying to move my discourse towards mining haterade or something when I've said that I was a miner myself, I have plenty of them in my alliance and I'm not against that activity.
I respect people that decides the way they want to play a game of meaningful choices. I don't like botters and I don't like to see noobs sticking to mine without knowing anything else just because no one bothered showing them.
It isn't a free choice if you only know a very small piece of the spectrum of choices.
Mining ore is arguably the worst isk source but it's trivial to escalate horizontally. I don't have an issue with low income low attention game play but I would like to see more content like ninja gas mining where you risk a venture to get in 15 min what a mackinaw gets in one hour.
Migui is running for CSM10!
|

Tora Bushido
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
1968
|
Posted - 2015.02.16 12:10:32 -
[50] - Quote
I just listened to your Capstable interview and think you would be a good CSM. Only heard good ideas. Not a single thing I disagreed on. Added you to my endorse list .
http://capstable.net/2015/02/15/migui-xhyrrn/
TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC
YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
|
|

Bombicx
Incobe Solaris Blood Raider's Corsairs
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 12:50:11 -
[51] - Quote
+1 |

Seith Garcim
Comunidad Hispania Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 18:00:52 -
[52] - Quote
+1 |

suicide
The Exit Plan Test Alliance Please Ignore
14
|
Posted - 2015.02.20 17:49:37 -
[53] - Quote
+1 |

Kaos Maximo
Uranus Intruders Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2015.02.21 02:12:59 -
[54] - Quote
I would like to say that i dont know someone else better prepared for this kind of work than migui, its someone who always got your back whenever you need it, knows a lot about the game and has a lot of interaction with the people.
+123393204839
anyone who knows him would say the same |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
3776
|
Posted - 2015.02.22 10:43:14 -
[55] - Quote
Llego tarde, pero tendr+ís 2 votos m+¡os.
I am late, but you'll have 2 votes from me. 
The Greater Fool Bar is now open for business, 24/7. Come and have drinks and fun somewhere between RL and New Eden! Ingame chat channel: The Greater Fool Bar
|

Soldarius
Kosher Nostra The 99 Percent
1130
|
Posted - 2015.02.25 21:01:03 -
[56] - Quote
Migui X'hyrrn wrote:As I said before, I signed the occupancy-sov proposal so there is that. I do like the GÇ£ El diginGÇÖs solutionGÇ¥ back in a few months ago.
Look at the names in that post. Such history.
2012 was a great year in nulsec. HBC had 14,000 proud sperging assholes all shooting the crap out of each other the south.
Eve-O isn't just about ships balancing, power projection, economics, and meta-gaming spies. Its also about the ties and friendships we form with other players that transcend alliance or coalition boundaries. I think Migui knows something of that.
The CSM needs a member that knows what its like to go from major powerhouse to utter bottom of the barrel, and the long climb back out of irrelevance. He also has a stable personality and a dislike of drama, unlike certain other candidates. If you are a member of TEST you should be voting for this guy. Even if you're not, you should still vote for him.
http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY
|

Ducem Kalgan
InterSun Freelance SONS of BANE
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 17:41:53 -
[57] - Quote
+1
Tienes mi voto compatriota. |

Abrams13 Zohn
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
4
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 19:54:53 -
[58] - Quote
+1 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |