| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 06:59:27 -
[1] - Quote
Hello there wormholers of eve online!
I am Bane Cortex, a long time wormholer and player of eve. I am looking to becoming part of CSM X. The main focus of my campaign is to solely aid CCP in the further development of Wormhole content and mechanics.
There are a few things I would like to focus on if I were to become part of CSM X would be as follows:
- Anomaly mechanics - Balance wormhole effect - Make wormholes more accessible for new players - Refine wormhole mechanics - Consistence of context for WH players - Refine corporate interface ( ie: Bookmark issues) - Lower class wormhole content - Make C1s viable content - More wormhole systems - Fix ore sites
The list goes on for potential ideas. Personally I feel wormholes and wormholers make up a critical part of eve online. They do require more attention and I would like to do this for us all.
Feel free to reply with question I will gladly reply.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 16:35:06 -
[2] - Quote
I will be adding to the post later today a expanded version of each point I posted originally, Also I am not picking wormholes because they are easy. I picked wormholes because I have almost solely been living in wormholes since their inception. I feel this is my strong suit in eve and I think there is room for improvement in this aspect of the game. |

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.02 16:36:27 -
[3] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:I don't mean to be probing, but something seems a little off. Some more indepth explanation would be good... but I have some concerns.
Zero Posts on the forum.
What seems like 0 wormhole experience.
Just left Sniggwaffle (been in and out of them).
Just started a alt corp for yourself claiming "wormholes". Your corps been around for 3 days, your the CEO, with 1 other guy in it.
Something doesn't pass the smell test.
I'll edit or remove this if more information from the candidate arises (everybody deserves a fair shot).
The corp I am in currently in part of a WH alliance. Bust almost every corp for the past few years that iv been involved with aside from sniggwaffe has been in WHs.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 03:20:40 -
[4] - Quote
Original post has been updates with additional information and refining of topics. |

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 03:23:33 -
[5] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:Bane Cortex wrote:Phoenix Jones wrote:I don't mean to be probing, but something seems a little off. Some more indepth explanation would be good... but I have some concerns.
Zero Posts on the forum.
What seems like 0 wormhole experience.
Just left Sniggwaffle (been in and out of them).
Just started a alt corp for yourself claiming "wormholes". Your corps been around for 3 days, your the CEO, with 1 other guy in it.
Something doesn't pass the smell test.
I'll edit or remove this if more information from the candidate arises (everybody deserves a fair shot). The corp I am in currently in part of a WH alliance. Bust almost every corp for the past few years that iv been involved with aside from sniggwaffe has been in WHs. That's cool, but I still can't put some of your history together. One of the first things people look at is the kill board. This month, catch, last month, nullsec, more nullsec, and more nullsec. The most I've seen out of the kill board regarding wormholes, outside of what seems like a 6th month long layoff (happens to everybody) is a vargur and a Mack in w space. That and your loss of a guardian to a bomber ( I would love to hear the backstory on that one). You seem to be primarily nullsec. Now to be a wormhole candidate doesn't mean you can never leave wormhole space, but it seems like you haven't sacrificed to BoB enough to really be put on the pedestal of a wormholer. If I am wrong here, please let me know, I have no issues with correcting my above assertions. Now if you are a guardian pilot I can get why the kill board looks like that (fly logi myself). But let's get past the conspiracy theory for a moment. Is there any wormholer you know, in your corp or alliance, who can speak to your character, play style, personality? While I may seem a bit skeptical, we really don't know who you are at all. What makes you want to be a wormhole CSM candidate? What are your opinions on the previous and current wormhole csm's? That being Corbexx, Asayamami Dei, Two Step, James Arget, Chitsa Jason. Have you spoken with any of them regarding their experiences, future or past changes, etc?
In relation to your question regarding my views on previous wormhole candidates my answer is ad follows:
There will always been room for improvement in everyones veiws of the same content. With that being said I have always been in support of at least one wormholer being on the CSM. Wormholes are a great part of this game and help make eve online the great game it is. I would rather at least have one of us in there than none :)
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.03 03:24:22 -
[6] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Welcome Bane, It is good to see another candidate with the time and commitment, willing to spend the effort required to represent the wormhole community.
I, as many of us, are very interested to see, just what you have in mind, the core ideas are sound, but as they say, the devil is in the detail.
Please give us the opportunity to support you, by expanding on the points you raise, we do need more to go on than just a few points from the wormhole little things thread.
I suggest you reach out to corbexx, he has been a masterful CSM, and a good example to follow. If you can convince him of your merit, and have his support, you will gain many supporters. He has earned the respect of the wide community, and If you can match his efforts, insight, and communication abilities, you will also prove a worthy candidate.
Good luck, and I for one will watch with great interest.
Thank you o7 |

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.04 02:40:16 -
[7] - Quote
Athanor Ruthoern wrote:Can you please tell us what type of wormhole you been living in and what you been doing in the wormholes . Tell us some more about you please.
I have spend most of my WH live in both C5s and C4 wormholes. I been in them for quite some time. As far as myself I have been in a few different wormhole corps probably my most know would be The Aesir. I came into possession of that corp when dmitry wizard stepped down as ceo.
Some personal information about my self would be that I am 22 years old and I am nearing the completion of my computer science degree. Game have always been a large part of my life and so has eve online.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.04 02:41:02 -
[8] - Quote
Sersei Sarum wrote:If wanted to get into wh space but I always felt like it was kind of scary for newer people.
Well this is one of the main points of my campaign :) I do agree wormholes can be very scary
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 03:54:07 -
[9] - Quote
Ariete wrote:Hi Bane, if your interested i'm going to be holding a CSM X wormhole debate. I have sent you a in game mail about the details.
I did reply to your in game mail friend |

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 03:28:10 -
[10] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:
Holly TwoStep balls.. I dont even know some of those. Dont be so cruel. In the end running for CSM to represent a group does not mean you have to know them. What it means is you have to understand them. Not sure how it is in this case though. shrug.
Thank you for the backing up. I do understand that I am not WELL known, but i still hope I can be a good choice to bring the feelings and views of ALL wormholers to the CSM not just those of a single large wormhole corp.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 03:17:38 -
[11] - Quote
Kynric wrote:Bane Cortex wrote: - Balance wormhole effect
I would like to point out Black holes and cataclysmic variables at this point. These along with some effect make certain wormholes undesirable.
Do you live in a black hole? If not why are you so eager to petition for changes to someone elses home? I live in a black hole system and rather like it. Yes some things are more difficult but that is part of the charm as well as the balance.
Each hole type does have their merits but there needs to be equal want for each hole time in my mind
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:48:02 -
[12] - Quote
Kynric wrote:Bane Cortex wrote: Each hole type does have their merits but there needs to be equal want for each hole time in my mind
Why does there need to be an equal number of people wanting each weather? Does this same idea apply to ships? Weapon systems? Anything else?
Obviously not. I just would like to see more people desire to be in wormholes. It it hard to find a new WHer now a days
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:49:09 -
[13] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:Do you intend to ignore everyone that doesn't toss you a softball question, or do you enjoy ignoring dialogue from people in the community you are campaigning to represent? You are quite possibly the first wormhole candidate I've ever met that I actually want to go out of my way to make sure you get no votes.
You really need to round turn your campaign or you are assured to have no chance at representing anyone this year. Your chances were slim before now, but as it stands I know for a fact you aren't even being considered by some wormhole groups.
I am trying me best to get questions answered when I can
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:52:39 -
[14] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Bane Cortex wrote:- Anomaly mechanics In relation to anomaly mechanics there are a few things I would like to look over. There is a definable issues for corps living in WHs mostly C5s with the randomness of the spawning of lowsec entrances to holes. This make corps living in these worm holes have to go through great wait times to be able to get to any content. Along with that being said there is also a large latency with spawn times on combat sites as well. I bring these points to the tables solely to aid in the creation of more content for players. Home content should be AS important as static content. im not really sure what you mean here but are you actually saying that there should be more home site content in WHs? because if you are, that the complete opposite of what the actual issue is. the vast majority of high end WH corps run pretty much all their PVE in their home system, farming sites with capitals. this leads to low content all around since it is extremely safe for them to do. if anything, corps should be encouraged to venture out of their home system to run site, not the other way around. Quote:- Balance wormhole effect I would like to point out Black holes and cataclysmic variables at this point. These along with some effect make certain wormholes undesirable. This is forcing corps that want to so content into wormholes where they may require more ships or skills in order to create content. The effects on wormholes should be more even across the board to make it so there are no wormholes left out, creating more content for players. this was done already Quote:- More wormhole systems I know over the years there have been additions of more WHs but i would like to see a steady increase in the number of wormholes as the player base for WH rises. As it stands it can be a very tasking and difficult process for a corpotation to fine an empty wormholes to live in. what are you basing this on? most of wspace is very empty and it is easy to find even empty HS static C2s, which historically were always full. It take very little effort to find an empty WH of any class for a new corp to move into. Quote:- Fix ore sites The creation of more ore sites for wormholes would be a great addition for eve online and would allow there to be a larger player base for doing wormhole mining. I do believe that mining minerals in a wormhole should be more viable than it currently is. More ore sites is not the solution here. ore is freely available in wspace because no one mines it. a big part of this is the move of ore sites from sigs to anoms which is something i firmly believe was a mistake and should be reverted.
1) I do have to agree with your first point, i do understand that statics are always a great area to explore and I push the currently alliance I am in to explore our statics. Also with the addition of secondary statics this does help corps make content.
2) I do understand that but there is always room for improvement. Maybe even some NEW WH effects.
3) I can disagree with this I have had a very difficult time trying to find a new WH for my current corp.
4) The mining is w-space should me more desirable.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:53:41 -
[15] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:Bane Cortex wrote:Phoenix Jones wrote:I don't mean to be probing, but something seems a little off. Some more indepth explanation would be good... but I have some concerns.
Zero Posts on the forum.
What seems like 0 wormhole experience.
Just left Sniggwaffle (been in and out of them).
Just started a alt corp for yourself claiming "wormholes". Your corps been around for 3 days, your the CEO, with 1 other guy in it.
Something doesn't pass the smell test.
I'll edit or remove this if more information from the candidate arises (everybody deserves a fair shot). The corp I am in currently in part of a WH alliance. Bust almost every corp for the past few years that iv been involved with aside from sniggwaffe has been in WHs. That's cool, but I still can't put some of your history together. One of the first things people look at is the kill board. This month, catch, last month, nullsec, more nullsec, and more nullsec. The most I've seen out of the kill board regarding wormholes, outside of what seems like a 6th month long layoff (happens to everybody) is a vargur and a Mack in w space. That and your loss of a guardian to a bomber ( I would love to hear the backstory on that one). You seem to be primarily nullsec. Now to be a wormhole candidate doesn't mean you can never leave wormhole space, but it seems like you haven't sacrificed to BoB enough to really be put on the pedestal of a wormholer. If I am wrong here, please let me know, I have no issues with correcting my above assertions. Now if you are a guardian pilot I can get why the kill board looks like that (fly logi myself). But let's get past the conspiracy theory for a moment. Is there any wormholer you know, in your corp or alliance, who can speak to your character, play style, personality? While I may seem a bit skeptical, we really don't know who you are at all. What makes you want to be a wormhole CSM candidate? What are your opinions on the previous and current wormhole csm's? That being Corbexx, Asayamami Dei, Two Step, James Arget, Chitsa Jason. Have you spoken with any of them regarding their experiences, future or past changes, etc?
I can assure you most of my playing time of this game has been spent in a wormhole, on this character or on one of my alts.
|

Bane Cortex
Sleepers. You Are Being Monitored
1
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:57:44 -
[16] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:Bane Cortex wrote:I am Bane Cortex, a long time wormholer and player of eve. I'm friends with Dmitry, and knew the Aesir from the Ragnarok days, but I don't think I've ever dealt with or heard of you, unless you are running on an alt. I'm on my last leg of the game, but I've been in very active in wormholes since their inception, and I am skeptical of your experience. Personally, if I saw your corp history alone, I'd say you look like an alt. But to each their own. I'll discuss my thoughts on your ideas below. Bane Cortex wrote:- Anomaly mechanics
In relation to anomaly mechanics there are a few things I would like to look over. There is a definable issues for corps living in WHs mostly C5s with the randomness of the spawning of lowsec entrances to holes. This make corps living in these worm holes have to go through great wait times to be able to get to any content. Along with that being said there is also a large latency with spawn times on combat sites as well. I bring these points to the tables solely to aid in the creation of more content for players. Home content should be AS important as static content. I lived in C5's for a loooong time, and if we really wanted content, we could always make it. If you are having issues with content in your wormholes, it may be the people you're playing with... I think you may need to diversify your experience before proposing changes like this. Bane Cortex wrote:- Balance wormhole effect
I would like to point out Black holes and cataclysmic variables at this point. These along with some effect make certain wormholes undesirable. This is forcing corps that want to so content into wormholes where they may require more ships or skills in order to create content. The effects on wormholes should be more even across the board to make it so there are no wormholes left out, creating more content for players. I don't support the concept that wormhole effects need to be "balanced" to be more aligned because they don't want to diversify their skill training. Wormholes aren't rookie mode, and to be "good" in wormholes over time, you should have a more diverse skill portfolio. In my time in wormholes, I've flown tons of various doctrines and ships, and when our guys wanted to play in a particular "bonus", we would create ship/fleet comps for a doctrine, train for it, and test it. Game mechanics shouldn't be altered in this case. Bane Cortex wrote:- Make wormholes more accessible for new players
This strongly follows suit with the last two points I made. There is a strong need for content to be explored more and possible have more mechanics made so there is more interest in wormholes for new players. Wormholes are a great part of eve online and every new player should be able to explore then. No. Create a better scanning/exploration/(maybe wormholes) tutorials or missions, but absolutely NO changes to wormholes to make them easier for new players. It isn't "new player" content, so if they really want to live and play in wormholes, go for it, and learn through the losses. The best wormholers/players learn through loss.
1) Not an alt.
2) I do understand that content can always be made of one looks hard enough. My point is there are options for the addition of "different" content to allow for diversity. Also as far as my corp is concerned that's not a factor. Nor should I need to reference in with that argument.
3) I do understand your veiw for that one. I would however always like to see lower SP players become viable in WHs
4) refer to answer for #3
|
| |
|