Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2024
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 01:10:46 -
[1] - Quote
Greetings. I am Trinkets friend. You may remember me from such forum topics as Trinkets Friendly Wormhole Advice Column, various F&I threads, and not much else.
I have a blog. You may read this blog to find out a bit about how i think. I do some YouTube videos, but not many, as I forget to activate the recording most times.
I run Prolapse. TBGRL- alliance, and Sudden Buggery -BUGRY- corporation. This in no way entitles me to any respect, just a kind of deep, enduring pity.
Here is my terrible manifesto of things I will do while avoiding deep vein thrombosis on the flight to iceland:
Highsec Highsec content is dominated by boring mining and war dec griefing. I think EVE needs more valuable and varied content than camping 4-4 in instalocking ships or circling belts before being ganked.
No capital RR. I will agitate to prevent capital access to high security space in any manner where capital RR's come into play. If you think that CODE or marmites, or any organisation full of cowardsauce mouthbreathing gate-hugging cretins will not utterly exploit the hell out of even Rorqual RR on the Sivala or Niarja gate or Dodixie, Jita or Amarr undock, then you have your head ensconced firmly buttockward.
Capital Transit Pass. Capital transits of highsec, for a 50M ISK, 24 hour license fee to CONCORD? Sure. I have a dread effectively trapped in Thakala, I'd pay to avoid space AIDS getting it across Empire.
I will agitate for Tags For Standings. I screwed my Amarr standings harder than a carpenter screws a door to it's hinges, far too early in my EVE career, and I cbf to do the 4 hours plus of the bloody epic arc to fix the standings, and you can only do the COSMOS missions so many times. With the success of Tags For Sec, I will promulgate and agitate for Tags For Standings.
New Player Experience. This is a vital part of keeping EVE strong, CCP liquid, and the community growing. I will work on improving the NPE, particularly with the 50% of players who go out solo missioning and never discover a corporation and the social aspect of the MMO. I will agitate to put more leaders in the NPE to let new players access corporate content.
Loyalty Point Rebalance. Ever seen a Khanid navy 1MN MWD? No? Wonder why that is? Ever wondered why Derelik and Khanid are so dead? maybe it's because the LP cost, tag cost and usefulness of the modules you can buy from the stores is so out of wack it's not even funny. I will agitate to have CCP rebalance the tag cost, LP cost and mission availability of all highsec faction missions to improve rewards, interest and content.
Lowsec Lowsec content is accessible to everyone, and generally fine. However, there's a few things I think need some work, and I will go in there batting for you pirate scum.
FW Missions. I really detest the LP payouts for something farmable by alts in bombers. Million LP per hour harvests are entirely too common. Whilst this results in deliciously cheap faction ships it is stupid.
Pirate Faction missions and content. I want to see Pirate Faction COSMOS style missions, a better spread of pirate faction content, phat loots and more exploration content to drive or lure more people to live, work, and exist in lowsec such as Aridia, Solitude, etc.
Nullsec I see nullsec's problems as being its general emptiness, and this is driven in part by the massive amount of rentinggoing on, where whole regions are leased out to risk-averse bears by colaitions of greedy spitballs.
I will push for activity-based sov control. I want to see, for example, Shadow of xXDEATHXx lose 90% of its sov simply because no one lives there. I want to see small alliances of clueless noobs move out to the echoing halls of abandoned stations, existing like space moss between the toes of the monolithic coalitions, a real nullsec ecology not a monoculture of instadocking farmers.
Skynet carriers. Screw them in particular, I will not support anything to do with risk averse assigned DPS.
Wormholes I will be Corbexx's stunt coq. We will form a team Voltron-***-human centipede of fact-based investigations of what really makes wormholes tick, what is really wrong with them, and how to improve their content.
I will table flip like a pro when we get ignored by CCP railroading content onto us which we don't need.
I will try to get POSs fixed without CCP Greyscale style no-bubble POSs. I love the bubble and all its foibles.
I will get you title-assigned SMA's, sensible corporation role and title management, POS security.
I will get you universal one size fits all Subcapital Assembly Arrays, because what industry in wormholes REALLY needs is 4 different types of arrays to build ships!
I will get you a soft-nerfed Proteus. I will attempt to get you a viable cloaky Loki and cloaky Tengu that carry more than 250 DPS. I will get you a laser Legion which doesn't suck. I will, sadly, be agitating to nerf a few things too, like the Guristas ships and Mordus ships.
You will get a re-look at W-R effects. Admit it, it's a bit ridiculous in a clownish way.
But most of all, wormholers, you will get sensible, analytical and in-depth brains representing you on the CSM.
Incursions I will contact Teamspeak and agitate for a feature which detects whiny entitled Incursion FC speech patterns and replaces it with a recording of Catherine Zeta Jones saying "Primary the Jita Nagamanen" or whatever. This will improve incursion viability 100 fold instantly
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2024
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 01:13:58 -
[2] - Quote
I will also be going for cross-dressing capabilities for avatars in the NEX Store, Boy George style makeup for duders, and Crocs footwear.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
1901
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 05:48:20 -
[3] - Quote
+1
TF has been one of my favorite wormholers/bloggers/videocasters in this game! Not only did I get the privilege of flying with this gent for a while, but I can confirm that he knows the community he intends to represent. I think that along with Corbexx, TF will make a fine addition to the CSMX delegation, and his way of communication will always keep everyone engaged.
So excited to see you running, and best of luck!
Irrelevant | Twitter: @autoritare
E-mail: [email protected]
My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/
The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
540
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 06:44:13 -
[4] - Quote
I'm happy to see you running, I'd just like to ask you this (I bet you can see why): How do you plan to balance out what you believe is right and needed with what your voters and constituency will think and want? You are clearly very good at making your point and having it heard. But it is sometimes quite different form what the rest/majority (judging by forums) of wormholers would want.
W-Space Realtor
|
Raziel Walker
Lucifer's Hammer A Band Apart.
25
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 10:16:29 -
[5] - Quote
You want to keep CCP liquid. What's wrong with sober and solvent?
LP rebalance, any blog posts out there or soming that explain what is wrong for the people that ignore LP? -just nerf FW LP into the ground please-
Get Corbexx to endorse you and I'll place you above him in my voting list. |
Nox52
Lycosa Syndicate Prolapse.
53
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 10:20:56 -
[6] - Quote
Please vote for TF, for future epic moments of wife aggro.
And because he knows left from right. Mainly the aggro tho. |
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation The Kadeshi
1192
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 11:17:05 -
[7] - Quote
Just out of curiosity with regards to your Tag/LP Cost rebalance:
What do you think about a dynamic Tag/LP cost where most farmed factions (NPC corps are too specific I think, as you can game the mechanics easier) require more LP/Tags and those factions which are less activity require less Tags/LP. It would mean that players need to check more and compare more for who they run missions and move around more to find juicier LP stores than just Caldari Navy for certain items. It should obviously depend on the availability of modules, if there is only 1 LP store faction supplying a thing, it should not suffer from overfarming as there is no other choice. It is rigable and manipulatable if not implemented correctly, but what do you think about it? |
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1043
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 14:42:25 -
[8] - Quote
If this is a serious run, you got my vote.
TF, you need to publish yourself a bit more. Didn't notice you till I was actively looking for wormhole candidates on this forum (there is Corbexx, you, and one nullsecr mascarading as a wormhole guy.
You probably want to jump onto podside, or cap stable podcast.
Yaay!!!!
|
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1044
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 15:48:36 -
[9] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:
I will get you a soft-nerfed Proteus. I will attempt to get you a viable cloaky Loki and cloaky Tengu that carry more than 250 DPS. I will get you a laser Legion which doesn't suck. I will, sadly, be agitating to nerf a few things too, like the Guristas ships and Mordus ships.
You do realize that if you advocate for a dps cloaky ship on the Loki and Tengu, you basically shoot all T1 and a good chunk of T2 cruiser ships and quazi force people into the realm of 400+ dps at 30+ range dps 80,000 ehp cloaky cruisers. I'm somewhat disagreeing here but its not because those ships in those configurations need help, but because we really shouldn't have covops cruiser setups that can tank like the dickens, output sizeable damage, with no real significant downside.
The DPS of the Proteus comes with the sacrifice of mobility. You have to be within scram range in order to apply significant damage. That's the downside (there are others, that's the most glaring).
Giving kiting setups that can cloak on a dime and do significant dps will cause problems. You know your stuff, I just disagree with you on that point.
Still keep the good fight going.
Yaay!!!!
|
Darth Bex
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
18
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 00:07:36 -
[10] - Quote
I think in regards to Strategic Cruisers he's just suggesting it would be nice if the Tengu, Loki and Legion Covert Ops variants were at least capable of doing the same sort of damage as Combat Recons, lest W-Space become Combat Recons online. They could then fulfill a heavy tackle role whilst still being a contributor on the damage output, and the Combat Recons can lay down the eWar. |
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2033
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 02:40:51 -
[11] - Quote
Axloth Okiah wrote:I'm happy to see you running, I'd just like to ask you this (I bet you can see why): How do you plan to balance out what you believe is right and needed with what your voters and constituency will think and want? You are clearly very good at making your point and having it heard. But it is sometimes quite different form what the rest/majority (judging by forums) of wormholers would want.
Behind the silk screens of a Chinese Wall which you get in the CSM (NDA's etc) you have to be able to divorce yourself from in-game allegiances, pet hates (eg, the Corax), etcetera, if presented with evidence by Fozzie's "metrics" for example, and do what's best for the game and/or community.
Now, sometimes this may mean, for example, if the roteus needs a PG nerf to balance its uber tank and the evidence and arguments are ample, I will have to accept that a nerfed proteus cannot mount 5 x Large Smartbombs. If I have to give up my smartbombing Proteus in order to see viable cloaky legion DPS and loki DPS then so be it. I understand what balance is.
The constituency can be quite rabid and knee-jerky, at least on the forums. C.F. the last time something happened to wormholes. I think CCP has made it clear they have a vision for EVE and will do what they think is needed - the CSM is there to moderate the process and provide feedback. CCP's effort in PR have been abysmal lately (lockageddon) so the CSM should be there to provide a pressure valve.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2033
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 02:55:40 -
[12] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:Trinkets friend wrote:
I will get you a soft-nerfed Proteus. I will attempt to get you a viable cloaky Loki and cloaky Tengu that carry more than 250 DPS. I will get you a laser Legion which doesn't suck. I will, sadly, be agitating to nerf a few things too, like the Guristas ships and Mordus ships.
You do realize that if you advocate for a dps cloaky ship on the Loki and Tengu, you basically shoot all T1 and a good chunk of T2 cruiser ships and quazi force people into the realm of 400+ dps at 30+ range dps 80,000 ehp cloaky cruisers. I'm somewhat disagreeing here but its not because those ships in those configurations need help, but because we really shouldn't have covops cruiser setups that can tank like the dickens, output sizeable damage, with no real significant downside. The DPS of the Proteus comes with the sacrifice of mobility. You have to be within scram range in order to apply significant damage. That's the downside (there are others, that's the most glaring). Giving kiting setups that can cloak on a dime and do significant dps will cause problems. You know your stuff, I just disagree with you on that point. Still keep the good fight going.
I think we can Stratios the Stratios here, which sort of 600 DPS / 60K EHP and sentries for damage projection.
Your cloaky Prot has a DPS envelope of 250-550+ (700?), and 60-140K++ EHP right now. Balanced? Yes. You can fit rails to cloaky Proteii,with decent tank and decent damage projection and reasonable speed.
Try fitting a cloaky Arty Loki and see how you go. That's my point. To my mind there's no real competition from Lokis and legions with Stratios and Proteii. You may disagree, but to my mind upping the cloaky loki's potential DPS envelope from 220-270 to 220-400 isn't beyond the realms of rational.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2033
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 03:18:05 -
[13] - Quote
Raziel Walker wrote:You want to keep CCP liquid. What's wrong with sober and solvent?
LP rebalance, any blog posts out there or soming that explain what is wrong for the people that ignore LP? -just nerf FW LP into the ground please-
Get Corbexx to endorse you and I'll place you above him in my voting list.
https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/lpstore/
http://www.evedata.org/iskPerLP.cgi
This is of course an argument about return on ISK, which is in part an argument about where the market is and where the metagame is in terms of demand for faction modules. For example, as above, khanid navy webs, neuts, armour hardeners, etc, are all roughly as expensive (if not more expansive0 than the Imperial navy variants.
The ISK per LP returns are affected by faction warfare LP, in many instances, but also by tag cost. For example, in the field of 1MN prop mods the tags required to even cash in on one of these modules are to my mind insane, hence why some of these modules would cost over 100M to make, and hence cannot compete with deadspace modules, which are also superior.
The question really is, what's the point of having something in the game, and going through module tiercide, if some of these modules are basically worthless to build under any forseeable scenario? The meta of the game isn't going to change to favor faction 1MN MWD's over C-type MWD's any time soon.
Therefore, i see a lot of scope to address these issues. The objective would be to throw open a lot of high-sec and low-sec space for missioning to supply modules which people may actually use. Reducing the number of tags required to build these things, down from 255 in some cases, will also address the ability of people to care about moving around, exploring space and content.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Janeway84
Def Squadron Pride Before Fall
137
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 08:06:38 -
[14] - Quote
+1 would vote |
Dersen Lowery
Drinking in Station
1447
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 18:09:54 -
[15] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:I will get you
I'm going to read that as "I will try to get you," because tromping into the CSM saying "Give me this" is probably not going to end well.
Otherwise, +1 for a solid and engagingly-written platform.
Question: Given that CCP has said that sov is next on the menu, what are you going to bring to the table on that subject? I know it's not your forte, but the odds are approximately 100% that you're going to be in real and virtual rooms with CCP developers over an extended period of time discussing the subject, and with only 14 people on the CSM there's not much room for abstention. So what are you hoping to bring to the table?
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
|
corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
1226
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 19:11:27 -
[16] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote: Question: Given that CCP has said that sov is next on the menu, what are you going to bring to the table on that subject? I know it's not your forte, but the odds are approximately 100% that you're going to be in real and virtual rooms with CCP developers over an extended period of time discussing the subject, and with only 14 people on the CSM there's not much room for abstention. So what are you hoping to bring to the table?
I'm seeing this alot from people, for some reason everyone thinks ccp will be doing nothing but sov or null stuff and its just not the case. There will be tonnes of other stuff going on along side this, POS's, roles, npe, balancing stuff, loads of little things the list goes on. Another example of this was last summit which was "Null focused" had a grand total of 2 hours out of 4 days of meetings.
Corbexx for CSM X - Wormholes still deserve better
|
Dersen Lowery
Drinking in Station
1447
|
Posted - 2015.02.06 20:13:51 -
[17] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Dersen Lowery wrote: Question: Given that CCP has said that sov is next on the menu, what are you going to bring to the table on that subject? I know it's not your forte, but the odds are approximately 100% that you're going to be in real and virtual rooms with CCP developers over an extended period of time discussing the subject, and with only 14 people on the CSM there's not much room for abstention. So what are you hoping to bring to the table?
I'm seeing this alot from people, for some reason everyone thinks ccp will be doing nothing but sov or null stuff and its just not the case. There will be tonnes of other stuff going on along side this, POS's, roles, npe, balancing stuff, loads of little things the list goes on. Another example of this was last summit which was "Null focused" had a grand total of 2 hours out of 4 days of meetings.
Just for the record, I don't believe that. I'm essentially asking what he brings to a subject which will come up, and which is outside his core competency.
But thanks for the clarification.
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2036
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 00:36:52 -
[18] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:Trinkets friend wrote:I will get you I'm going to read that as "I will try to get you," because tromping into the CSM saying "Give me this" is probably not going to end well. Otherwise, +1 for a solid and engagingly-written platform. Question: Given that CCP has said that sov is next on the menu, what are you going to bring to the table on that subject? I know it's not your forte, but the odds are approximately 100% that you're going to be in real and virtual rooms with CCP developers over an extended period of time discussing the subject, and with only 14 people on the CSM there's not much room for abstention. So what are you hoping to bring to the table?
True, I'm not Mittens' right hand man. i don't run a rental empire. I don't rat in a carrier, or even an AFKtar. But I have done my time in nullsec on 3 occasions, from Stain to Delve to NC Dot.
Like I said, I will be supporting and, depending on CCP's willingness to listen, providing feedback to them on occupancy based sov. This is because I believe that the game needs more reasons for people to fight, and two whole regions of space being permanently transferred in an instant from one rental empire to another, to perhaps never be utilised, doesn't sit right with me.
If you're familiar with the R3PO-Z story, an ex-BUGRY member has been part of that. This stuff should be happening more often. Occupany based sov should be a catalyst for conflict.
Right now, a band of ne'er do-wells terrorises a ratting Empire and stops a whole region ratting for a month, and nothing changes except the small band of aggressors get ground down by sheer numbers while the farmers take a break for a month and pay NC Dot to evict their annoyance.
In the future, if you don't farm the region, constellation or individual systems enough they should fall off the back of your truck. No month-long breaks while you rat blue space safely - you won't be going back to your home, your assets and towers will be lost, your landlords impoverished and more and more predators will move in.
Sure, it will force people to play the game smarter, but nullsec is boring as hell, safe as hell and empty.
Where my experience comes in from wormholes is being able to see a vision of a game where you take a calculated risk. Every time you get out of POS in a wormhole your ship can be killed, no warning, no chance. Yet we thrive and prosper and we develop skills in PVP, PVE, flying, fighting, making money and getting over the sense of whiny entitlement.
I see a lot of nullsec as being entirely too risk averse, and preserving their entire way of life is about maintaining security blankets versus bringing on more fights, more content, more excitement.
As a wormbro, i'll be there to ask questions and drill down into the motives and reasons behind why people do what they do, and why CCP thinks that one thing is better than another, why one choice in balancing is better than this or that. There's a lot in this game where the consequences of changing one thing can impact greatly on many others, not that you see that from most feedback which is one-dimensional Q.Q.
The other way to put it is this - I have no vested interest in the current state of nullsec, or indeed wormholes. If it looks sensible, I won't have fear of losing income, prestige, status and territory holding me back from saying it's good. Not that the current CSM's nullsec representatives seemed overly negative about the recent changes, far from it.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Ariete
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
14
|
Posted - 2015.02.07 13:57:02 -
[19] - Quote
Hi Trinkets, I am sorting out a wormhole debate next week. If you want to take part i have sent you the details in game.
Vote Ariete for CSM X
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2039
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 01:02:44 -
[20] - Quote
Consider my gauntlet thrown down for this debate.
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
870
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 02:34:44 -
[21] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Consider my gauntlet thrown down for this debate. Worf without make up, is that you?
While I do not agree with all the changes and opinions you express, I do like the way you write and the attitude it seems to convey.
+1
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
Nightingale Actault
Big Richard Club Ghosts of Deep Space
114
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 05:33:47 -
[22] - Quote
TF,
Can you maintain the same level of involvement and activity that Corbexx has brought as a WH CSM representative for the duration of the term?
If yes, will you also be able to maintain TF Wormhole Advice Column and your existing duties as a CEO of a corporation and alliance? |
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2041
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 07:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
That's a good question, and a difficult one to answer.
Corbexx spent a hell of a lot of time grinding every conceivable type of wormhole PVE so that he would have hard data to present to the CSM and in particular CCP. it's in the minutes where he fact checks/body checks CCP (which was demonstrably ignorant of how poor the reward was) and the result was the increase in blue poo buy orders.
Your question is basically predicated on the notion that such epic feats are required not only of all CSM's but at all going into the future. Aside from the fact that it has by and large been done (and the fruits of Corbexx's labours are apparent) I would turn this around and say - what epic feats of grinding ought I do to have an equal effect on the game?
To answer that I can only say that I have a considerable amount of dissatisfaction with wormhole POSs and in particular the efforts required to go into sieging them out. I am sure there hasn't been any analysis done by CCP or indeed anyone to the extent that I have done the sums and come up with a solution (which i won't share, because it's so damn effective) to structure grinds in subcaps.
There's a lot i would like to do to guide POSs into a different sphere of utility for people who use them as more than a fuel-using cash machine in nullsec handling moon goo and reactions.
For instance, you're free to read my opinions on the matter on the forums and elsewhere.
Nullsec cash machines and moon harvesting crud can stop being a POS and be a different type of orbital module, IMO. Most moon goo POSs are just smalls with no guns, pretected by the threat of a blob of Blue Donut supercaps yoloing onto field to defend the RF timer and/or remove anything jimmied up in the wrong place. Often the biggest detriment to sov changes is the removal and flipping of POSs and all the amazing gameplay attendant with onlining and offlining POSs. slash sarcasm hashtag bluedonut.
Freed from needing reactions and moon harvesters the POS can become one or several types of starbase. Defensive hardpoints AKA Deathstar/Dullstar/Dickstar/Dampstars with lots of EHP and the like. maybe an industrial starbase with a one size fits all modular industrial setup. Like, why the hell do we need small, advanced small, medium, advanced medium, large, advanced large, capital and supercapital assemblies? To manufacture more than one size of ship in a wormhole or any POS you need to over-invest in PG hogging POS trash.
You want to see me get riled up and devote hours of effort to something? It's ranting about POSs. It's coming up with insane POS fits (really, ask around for those who've seen our POS), insane and cunning ways of taking out deathstars (sekrit methods at play), and insane amounts of frustration at managing them.
And yeah, you are right. This all takes time, and I do spend too much time probing chains of wormholes whilst simultaneously running an EVE corporation, two companies in real life (part time), keeping my wife happy and the like. I'd rather work smarter and avoid repeating Corbexx's odyssey of ratting to put the numbers and the ideas (well thought oout, fact-based and reasoned ideas) before CCP. And i'd love to spend less time probing and more time orbiting a 140M EHP dullstar in an oracle because POSs are super fun!
J's before K's.
Prolapse. Turning holes inside out with pew pew.
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Johnny Twelvebore
The Tuskers The Tuskers Co.
60
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 11:35:41 -
[24] - Quote
This man is a genius, and the guy who taught me as a four day old newb to fly in wormholes, can flip flippers and generally take the road less travelled. I am also the ex BUGRY dude who had a blast fighting the blob in REPO but the real star of that show was Bei Artjay.
He is knowledgeable, lucid and bloody hilarious.
Got my vote.
Bloody hell, another eve blog! http://johnnytwelvebore.wordpress.com
|
Mr Spaxi
The Bastards The Bastards.
16
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 12:24:51 -
[25] - Quote
Thanks to Johnny up there, I have been lulled into spaceship politics and you sir, will be getting my vote. Hat off. o/
Blog
Youtube
The Bastards are recruiting! Check us out @ www.the-bastards.net or join our channel @ DBastards.
Fly hard!
|
Nightingale Actault
Big Richard Club Ghosts of Deep Space
115
|
Posted - 2015.02.08 18:02:34 -
[26] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Your question is basically predicated on the notion that such epic feats are required not only of all CSM's but at all going into the future.
Nonsense :D
I will not say that Corbexx's effort with the PvE project was not an epic amount of work for someone to put in.
I do hope that a CSM representative maintains a certain level of visibility and activity (not something you have had a problem with). I also do not expect the same manner of visibility and activity of Corbexx, as every individual is different and their impact should be judged solely on their actions alone.
As others have pointed out in this very thread, your leadership and knowledge is also a driving force behind your corporation and alliance, and I would be hard pressed to ask them to lose you to burn out or other means.
|
Eric Shang
Living Asylum
213
|
Posted - 2015.02.09 11:01:26 -
[27] - Quote
+1
I went to null in a T1 Incursus and had no one in system for 22 jumps. Where are these renters even they speak of.
I fly my ships from a Asylum
My Pirate Journey:
http://ericshangthepirate.wordpress.com/
|
Jack Miton
Isogen 5
4143
|
Posted - 2015.02.10 22:28:06 -
[28] - Quote
I support this product and/or service.
+1
Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/
|
Bronya Boga
Isogen 5
558
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 06:43:34 -
[29] - Quote
I approve of this candidate. Very knowledgeable about Wspace and from my past interactions with him he seems like a stand up guy!
10/10 will be voting for him
Host of Down The Pipe Ingame Channel DTP Podcast
www.downthepipe-wh.com
GÇïIsogen 5 is recruiting. Check us out
|
Ghenghis Kralj
1st MC Wormhole Clown Car
54
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 17:49:10 -
[30] - Quote
what's your problem with clowns?!?!?! we got families to feed, too! |
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2065
|
Posted - 2015.02.11 23:54:42 -
[31] - Quote
I'm not racist, but....clowns are scary.
hashtagTF4CSMX
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
2082
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 01:29:10 -
[32] - Quote
Unfortunatley, I did not pass a background security check on my account, and have to withdraw my campaign.
Hopefully this provoked some debate for you all, at least.
hashtagTF4CSMX
http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
1903
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 02:22:37 -
[33] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Unfortunatley, I did not pass a background security check on my account, and have to withdraw my campaign.
Hopefully this provoked some debate for you all, at least. Well this is terrible news...
Irrelevant | Twitter: @autoritare
E-mail: [email protected]
My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/
The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
|
Kynric
Sky Fighters
266
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 04:29:53 -
[34] - Quote
Sorry to hear that. As a consolation prize the image of CCP checking API keys is amusing. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
918
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 05:31:06 -
[35] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:To answer that I can only say that I have a considerable amount of dissatisfaction with wormhole POSs and in particular the efforts required to go into sieging them out. "Allow worm hole dwellers to burn masses of fuel in order to keep a link open, without mass limit, long enough to burn out their neighbours (worm hole to worm hole only)."
Sorry to hear about your background check. If I land up in CSM, I will come pester you for another perspective.
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
Braxton Tscharke
Sudden Buggery Prolapse.
3
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 06:37:35 -
[36] - Quote
As someone who has had enjoyment of this game reinvigorated by the skulduggery of the one we call master, I must express my absolute disappointment in the narrow minded decision that CCP has made in blocking TF from running for CSM X. In my opinion the wormhole community lost its second best possible voice running for the CSM. Not only has TF been a very active voice of the WH and AUTZ community he has also succeeded where CCP has failed in introducing newer players into wormholes. Do your player base a favor and readdress the decision CCP or I will protest by smart-bombing little scanny ships.............. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. |
Nox52
Lycosa Syndicate Prolapse.
53
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 10:48:52 -
[37] - Quote
A very short-sighted and disappointing decision, especially given some of the other wh candidates (or lack thereof).
Wish they would reconsider or come outright and say what the issue is. |
Phoenix Jones
Isogen 5
1061
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 12:22:16 -
[38] - Quote
You can't pass the background check? This is CCP not the FBI. Just how naughty were you?
Yaay!!!!
|
Niskin
League of the Lost
221
|
Posted - 2015.02.13 21:39:11 -
[39] - Quote
Sorry to hear it TF, you would have been second on my ballot behind Corbexx. Having read your blog I have an idea about what the problem was. Does this prevent you from ever running or could you try again with another account? I think you'd make a great CSM and so I hope there is still a chance, even if it's for CSM 11 or 12 or 13...
It's Dark In Here - The Lonely Wormhole Blog
Remember kiddies: the best ship in Eve is Friendship.
-MooMooDachshundCow
|
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
542
|
Posted - 2015.02.14 12:38:37 -
[40] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Unfortunatley, I did not pass a background security check on my account, and have to withdraw my campaign.
Hopefully this provoked some debate for you all, at least. Thats it, time to evict CCP.
W-Space Realtor
|
|
Bellak Hark
New Eden Media Organization
39
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 18:13:46 -
[41] - Quote
Your CSM campaign ad |
Mortlake
Somalian Coast Guard Authority
245
|
Posted - 2015.02.19 11:19:09 -
[42] - Quote
Trink has my vote.
Plaswan. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |