EVE Search - I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because..

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because..

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Celestia Via Re-Awakened Technologies Inc The 11th Hour Alliance 17	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:06:12 - [1] - Quote I cannot seem to be able to finish that sentence, and neither could anyone on the recon thread , so, I thought to seek help here. Just for the record, I am personally against the immunity and can find only negatives about it, please help me see the positive side I am completely missing until now. So, give it your best shot, but please no "its good because i get easy kills", this actually goes in the negatives pile. Also, please, no negatives, the thread above is full of them, lets not repeat ourselves. Once more, "I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because.." go! There's no place like space
Vyl Vit 1040	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:08:58 - [2] - Quote ....when I'm in one you can't D-Scan meh. Why do you THINK? Anyone with any sense has already left town.
Abrazzar Vardaugas Family 5988	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:12:24 - [3] - Quote I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because it further breaks a method of intel gathering and thus allows investigation of the effect unreliable intel gathering has on the game and play styles. This information can then be used in a future development of new or altered intel gathering mechanics. tl;dr You have to cut the body open for an autopsy. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics
Celestia Via Re-Awakened Technologies Inc The 11th Hour Alliance 17	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:15:46 - [4] - Quote I think its a bad thing that needs to be removed from the game because it hurts many aspects of it and benefits none. Try to convince me otherwise. Please, posting in a manner like "Its good cause its good for me" is wasted bytes, lets hear some thoughts on how this change benefits the game as a whole. There's no place like space
Celestia Via Re-Awakened Technologies Inc The 11th Hour Alliance 17	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:17:17 - [5] - Quote EDIT : Double post, please delete, thanks There's no place like space
Marsha Mallow 1904	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:22:21 - [6] - Quote I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because... ...I could never be bothered learning to d-scan anyway, so I make minions do it then blame then when we die. clickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclickclick ohgod we all died, YOU ARE A TERRIBLE FC, yay I can go badpost on the forums ^ I think everyone should adopt this mentality. Failing that, get some booze and revisit the topic when you're blathered. DON'T BE RIDICULOUS!
Paranoid Loyd 3778	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:22:38 - [7] - Quote It is good because it shakes things up and adds danger to the game. "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Memphis Baas 116	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:27:08 - [8] - Quote You're complaining about d-scan immunity as a stand-alone ability, but not about d-scan immunity as a byproduct of ships that can warp cloaked? Half the recons didn't show up on your d-scan, now all recons are invisible. So more ships are seeing more use, which is what is good.
Yarda Black Militaris Industries Northern Coalition. 550	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:27:29 - [9] - Quote it allows stealth without the need for a cloak and thus simply copy-ing the existing Recon and thus creates a "new" type of ship with a new style of gameplay. For the record; I'm replying to your first post and sharing my opinion. I have no interest in convincing you of anything. In all honesty, your own strong opinion probably means you don't really care about mine, despite the impression your first post gives.
Crumplecorn Eve Cluster Explorations 1967	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:31:00 - [10] - Quote I believe the d-scan immunity on Recons is good because tears from bads are delicious. Witty Image - Stream Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment
Nathan Galbadia Covert Crops Inc. 3	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:46:04 - [11] - Quote The definition of Reconnaissance is military observation of a region to locate an enemy or ascertain strategic features. This is normally done by hidden and undiscovered units. A recon ship should excel at that, or it wouldn't be specialized for recon. This is good as it allows intel gathering from all sides, which could then lead to more moves made against one another. Conflict and desire for increased power are the driving factors of EVE. Alliances moving against one another create some of the best content in EVE. Gathering intel on one another will generate conflict, either from an alliance finding a vulnerable target or from the recon being discovered. IMO this can only be a good thing. If someone AFK cloaks in your system, and you all dock up until he leaves, you are missing out on some fun times. This is when you should be planning to counter whatever action the recon ship is there for. The ability to influence actions from other players it what the D-Scan immunity is going to enable. When you see someone enter local and can't scan the ship, docking miners and undocking PVP ships should be your action.
Metal Icarus Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad. 726	Posted - 2015.02.06 19:58:26 - [12] - Quote ... the target does not run away before I get on grid and I actually get to use my curse.
Tikra Vargur Republic University Minmatar Republic 5	Posted - 2015.02.06 20:15:06 - [13] - Quote You really want to shake things up remove me from local when I activate my cloak
Hibernator X Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact 33	Posted - 2015.02.06 20:20:11 - [14] - Quote It strengthens an entire playstyle: The fleet prober
Milla Goodpussy Federal Navy Academy 153	Posted - 2015.02.06 20:34:13 - [15] - Quote once again you see these dev's pull out idiotic thoughts and it causes the playerbase to foam at the mouth in rage. I just look forward to the day these guys go way of greyscale.. yeah I said it so what.. they put this into the game..but dare not even touch cloaky campers and unlimited cloaking.. haha
ISD Decoy ISD Community Communications Liaisons 362	Posted - 2015.02.06 20:35:41 - [16] - Quote Quote: 17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked. As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread. Please use the original Recon thread you linked to continue discussion on this topic. Thread locked. ISD Decoy Lieutenant Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.