EVE Search - BM vs LAG what would u prefer.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

BM vs LAG what would u prefer.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Sir JoJo Minmatar Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:00:00 - [1] question. 1: how much would the server performance increase if CCP did a delete all BM? 2: would u rather have no bm or a limited amount and less lag or as it is now? Idea. what about some kind of dynamic bm system. so like u can create bm in sys u can use but they will delete itself when u leave a system. if any have ideas come forward ;) me myslef would 100% rather have no bm longer travel time and more risky gameplay for less lag. snip Don't be nasty [email protected] to discuss mod - Cathath i am not nasty
Kweel Nakashyn Minmatar Aeden Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:03:00 - [2] Well, Newbies prefer BM, old timers prefer no-lag. :)
PastaMadaFaka	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:09:00 - [3] if u wana get rid of some lag one of the first things that comes first to my mind is all those containers in the belts that most of them are there for just taking space i think that just by taking that out would have less lag ingame would be nice if there was like a anchor time limit for the cans
ponieus Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:10:00 - [4] get rid of the G2G bm's give a warp to 0 option --------------------------------------------- Maybe we will win the war by getting every bob pilot banned from eve maybe.:/ --thebold
Major Stormer Caldari Demon Womb Xelas Alliance	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:10:00 - [5] both sound crap to me. -------------------------- Above post is my opinion only and does not represent my corp/alliance.
solidshot Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:11:00 - [6] last i heard the bm copying changes were suposed to remove lag, but as far as i can tell it did bugger all so what would removing bms do?
Major Stormer Caldari Demon Womb Xelas Alliance	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:11:00 - [7] Edited by: Major Stormer on 08/10/2006 14:10:57 Originally by: ponieus get rid of the G2G bm's give a warp to 0 option sigh A puppy dies everytime someone says warp to 0 -------------------------- Above post is my opinion only and does not represent my corp/alliance.
Death Kill Caldari direkte	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:13:00 - [8] I'd rather have no bm's and less lag tbh. N=R* x fp x ne x fl x Fi x fc x L
Cattraknoff Caldari Sha Kharn Corp Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:14:00 - [9] Originally by: solidshot last i heard the bm copying changes were suposed to remove lag, but as far as i can tell it did bugger all so what would removing bms do? Probably very little...I think a large chunk of the lag is from coding.
solidshot Sebiestor tribe	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:30:00 - [10] Originally by: Cattraknoff Probably very little...I think a large chunk of the lag is from coding. i agree, i think that was proven by the way that after the server upgrade it was flying, then they introduced a patch......
Oleg K77	Posted - 2006.10.08 14:48:00 - [11] Edited by: Oleg K77 on 08/10/2006 14:48:47 Plain speculation, imho. As far as i remember, devs said somewhere BM dont cause lag, copying BMs does.
Wizard Without Reason	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:15:00 - [12] How about we have a cap for the amount of bkmks a character can store in there p@p, would that solve it? Have like 200 bkmks only allowed. Without Reason corp website ^^looking for a PvP corp with little stress then
Sir JoJo Minmatar Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:24:00 - [13] Originally by: Wizard How about we have a cap for the amount of bkmks a character can store in there p@p, would that solve it? Have like 200 bkmks only allowed. could be an idea- no matter if copying create lags and bm itself dont or the other wway it would help alot i am sure of. but maybe a dev or so can tell how much bm effect servers snip Don't be nasty [email protected] to discuss mod - Cathath i am not nasty
Viktor Fyretracker Caldari Worms Corp	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:26:00 - [14] would be nice if they could find a safe way to store BMs locally. then the only traffic would be when someone trades a BM from one player to another player. but for example to move them to an alt they could just copy and paste locally. i honestly dont think there would be that much hacking of the BMs that it would matter for them to be local. its not like a BM can give me unlimited missles if hacked anyway.
Polaskii Amarr RONA Midgard Academy	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:33:00 - [15] Maybe add a 28 Day life to Anchored Cans??
Savio Caldari Perkone	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:41:00 - [16] the problem with the new 5 bm¦s at a time copy thing. IS all the old players got bm for most systems wich is a huge advantage. For a new player to get these bm¦s is way more time consuming than before.. I think they should either say we got bm¦s or no bm¦s and make it even for both the new and the old players! . Need a Sign? Click Here
evistin Multiverse Corporation	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:44:00 - [17] I say no to LAG ----------- Management and Leadership û The Eve-online Guide
Carryon	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:45:00 - [18] I love an live by my bookmarks. The non-bookmark people are obviously not miners and traders, just a hint of alternate motives there? If it is the trading of bookmarks that causes lag, make everyone make their own. They are not hard. I agree with the secure can statement. Make people take them down every 3 months or so or lose them. They really clutter space out there.
Sir JoJo Minmatar Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.08 15:45:00 - [19] Originally by: Savio the problem with the new 5 bm¦s at a time copy thing. IS all the old players got bm for most systems wich is a huge advantage. For a new player to get these bm¦s is way more time consuming than before.. I think they should either say we got bm¦s or no bm¦s and make it even for both the new and the old players! BM copying is still very easy. and yes it should be either or not, and i prefer not ;) snip Don't be nasty [email protected] to discuss mod - Cathath i am not nasty
Vexoth	Posted - 2006.10.08 16:12:00 - [20] Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker would be nice if they could find a safe way to store BMs locally. then the only traffic would be when someone trades a BM from one player to another player. but for example to move them to an alt they could just copy and paste locally. i honestly dont think there would be that much hacking of the BMs that it would matter for them to be local. its not like a BM can give me unlimited missles if hacked anyway. No People would figure how to export local bookmarks. That would only encourage people to create gigantic bookmark databases which would then be freely shared on the internet.
NUBIARN MAJORITY O X I D E	Posted - 2006.10.08 16:35:00 - [21] well no lag, as tbh its got to a point where it is just not possible to play the game to anywhere nears it potential. personally i have been playing this game almost every day for almost 3 years and the lag is as worse now as its ever been. fleet combat just is not possible, missions are a joke and not being able to jump even when their is no one in local is just laughable. I for one are fed up with the issue. are bms responcible for this, no i dont think so maybe when jumping in initially with a big group but not on the whole. 2 years ago it was possible to have 100+ man fleet v 100+ man fleet all with 15 drones each and very very limited lag it is now not possible to even get 200 ppl in a system to have a fight . it is my opinion that if the lag issues are not fixed eve will loss alot of its more experienced player base. ioh and dont even get me started on the state of the petiotion system, loss ship to lag, petiton wait 6 weeks WTF, then either get perition closed for time out or a no lag on our records mssge lmao it is that bad . http://www.maja-corp.net/sigs/nub1.jpg signature removed (max size 24000 bytes) - please email us (with the signature URL) if you want to know why - Pirlouit([email protected])
Sir JoJo Minmatar Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:07:00 - [22] Originally by: NUBIARN well no lag, as tbh its got to a point where it is just not possible to play the game to anywhere nears it potential. personally i have been playing this game almost every day for almost 3 years and the lag is as worse now as its ever been. fleet combat just is not possible, missions are a joke and not being able to jump even when their is no one in local is just laughable. I for one are fed up with the issue. are bms responcible for this, no i dont think so maybe when jumping in initially with a big group but not on the whole. 2 years ago it was possible to have 100+ man fleet v 100+ man fleet all with 15 drones each and very very limited lag it is now not possible to even get 200 ppl in a system to have a fight . it is my opinion that if the lag issues are not fixed eve will loss alot of its more experienced player base. ioh and dont even get me started on the state of the petiotion system, loss ship to lag, petiton wait 6 weeks WTF, then either get perition closed for time out or a no lag on our records mssge lmao it is that bad . i remember the old days yes. but think about it back then there was no near as many bm made ;) since then we also had several server upgrades.. if something else is creating the amout of lag we have atm i sure would like to know what it is, snip Don't be nasty [email protected] to discuss mod - Cathath i am not nasty
framolia Gallente The Breakfast Club	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:31:00 - [23] Keep the BM's! nuff said
Godar Marak Amarr Return Of Red Dawn	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:40:00 - [24] Originally by: Carryon I agree with the secure can statement. Make people take them down every 3 months or so or lose them. They really clutter space out there. Every 3 months wtf? How bout once a week, or even better....once every 3 days.
lofty29 Praxiteles Inc.	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:41:00 - [25] Originally by: framolia Keep the BM's! nuff said Stfu noob! --- Praxitele's Inc. is Recruiting!
MeGrand Gallente Thunder Talons	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:42:00 - [26] Bm's why? because i die to people more often than lag and bms are freqently the only thing keeping my fragile little ships alive All the right letters - just not nessacarily in the right order
lofty29 Praxiteles Inc.	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:45:00 - [27] Originally by: MeGrand Bm's why? because i die to people more often than lag and bms are freqently the only thing keeping my fragile little ships alive I've got between 0 and 0 insta-bms that I regularly use. I rarely die to gatecamps. Explanation? Skills. --- Praxitele's Inc. is Recruiting!
Reggie Stoneloader eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:53:00 - [28] Originally by: Major Stormer Edited by: Major Stormer on 08/10/2006 14:10:57 Originally by: ponieus get rid of the G2G bm's give a warp to 0 option sigh A puppy dies everytime someone says warp to 0 Groan Don't be silly, it's always been a good idea, and would solve far more problems than it would cause. Civis Ascendant Sum
Jim McGregor Caldari	Posted - 2006.10.08 18:56:00 - [29] Originally by: Reggie Stoneloader Originally by: Major Stormer Edited by: Major Stormer on 08/10/2006 14:10:57 Originally by: ponieus get rid of the G2G bm's give a warp to 0 option sigh A puppy dies everytime someone says warp to 0 Groan Don't be silly, it's always been a good idea, and would solve far more problems than it would cause. I think its a good idea too. You can camp the gate on the other side, so what is the problem really? --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
The 5th	Posted - 2006.10.08 19:04:00 - [30] Originally by: lofty29 Originally by: MeGrand Bm's why? because i die to people more often than lag and bms are freqently the only thing keeping my fragile little ships alive I've got between 0 and 0 insta-bms that I regularly use. I rarely die to gatecamps. Explanation? Skills. These skills, is that looking at the map?, planning your route?, knowing when to fight or run to the gate? and warping to a planet near the gate, and scanning for people? stuff like that? any more tips you can give me? @OP I prefer no BM's i think if BM's were removed, then alot of people would move back into cruisers/frigs, in order for them to escape getting ganked and generally be faster. I think, could be wrong tho

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.