| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
k898
Dynamite Mining Division
Explosive Entry
0
   |
Posted - 2015.02.26 20:20:09 -
[1] - Quote
Wouldn't it be better if instead of having the coalition in name have it officially recognized and made up of the alliances. |
Reina Xyaer
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:01:39 -
[2] - Quote
Hearing people call for this almost makes me physically angry...
We already have "Coalitions", they're called Alliances.
It's just Blueception from you people... "we want officially recognized alliances of alliances, and then alliances of alliances of alliances, and then we'll need alliances of coalitions of alliances."
Seriously blow my brains out. Is this a troll post? It's working really well. I'm so mad bro. |
Lugh Crow-Slave
805
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:10:28 -
[3] - Quote
there is no real need for this
-1
Fuel block colors? Missiles for Caldari T3?
|
Anhenka
The Cult of Personality
DARKNESS.
1116
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:20:50 -
[4] - Quote
If we are lucky, next week will bring us the news that will make this concept obsolete.
And if not, still -1. |
Iain Cariaba
1089
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:27:46 -
[5] - Quote
k898 wrote:Wouldn't it be better if instead of having the coalition in name have it officially recognized and made up of the alliances.
Wouldn't it be better if, instead of posting the same repetitive ****, people used the search function to find out if their "idea" had already been posted a few hundred times before?
Reported for redundancy.
EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.
"This reminds me - I must complain to my local butcher about him not catering to vegitarians." - admiral root responding to someone whining about too much PvP in Eve Online.
|
k898
Dynamite Mining Division
Explosive Entry
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:41:59 -
[6] - Quote
first a gm told to make this post so stop being and *******. secound what the hell.is a collection of a collection of alliances coalitions are for the null alliances not ppeople who arent out of there starter corp yet - a coalition is the collection of alliances like CFC and HERO |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
984
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:43:06 -
[7] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=392810
CSM Ten movement for change.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
Status: Rabid carebear
Blog
|
k898
Dynamite Mining Division
Explosive Entry
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:48:28 -
[8] - Quote
good points jenshae |
k898
Dynamite Mining Division
Explosive Entry
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 21:49:48 -
[9] - Quote
i realise i should have looked before making a new one but this is my first one |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1935
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 22:03:56 -
[10] - Quote
k898 wrote:first a gm told to make this post so stop being and *******. secound what the hell.is a collection of a collection of alliances coalitions are for the null alliances not ppeople who arent out of there starter corp yet - a coalition is the collection of alliances like CFC and HERO
We all know what Coalitions are.
However the point people are making is that they don't need to be recognised. People can do everything inside a single alliance if they actually want to work together. The CFC would fit into 2 corps after all at the numbers I last heard quoted for their membership. Maybe 4 or 5 if they've grown a lot.
'Coalitions' exist because people don't want to have to work together in terms of directors and structure but still want all the protection those structures bring and all the blue buddies. And encouraging that is not a good way forward.
With changes to Sov, and improved Corp & alliance controls, people should be able to compress down into smaller numbers of larger corps and use alliances the way they were meant to be, rather than a million 1 man + 10 alt corps making up the alliances. |
k898
Dynamite Mining Division
Explosive Entry
0
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 22:11:29 -
[11] - Quote
at least you are being civil about it :) |
Anhenka
The Cult of Personality
DARKNESS.
1116
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 22:17:52 -
[12] - Quote
People have been wanting changes to halt the spread of super blobs comprised of multiple alliances conforming into coalitions, and even the spread of multiple coalitions forming together for large ops.
Anything that helps legitimize coalitions of coalition is something to be purged with fire.
On that note, early next week CCP will be announcing their plans for a sov rework, commonly anticipated to break the functionality of supercoalitions through changes in how sovereignty works. So if we are lucky, this thread will become entirely redundant as supercoalitions will begin to crumble.
The devblog pertaining to the changes is apparently around 7,700 words long according to CCP, so it's bound not be be some tiny change to Sov structure HP or something else insignificant. |
Civ Kado
Dutch East Querious Company
Phoebe Freeport Republic
58
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 22:44:27 -
[13] - Quote
You can form coalitions ad infinitum like some sort of fractal. Doing this sort of crap will only further stagnation as it becomes more of a challenge for small entities to compete.
I wish there was some sort of way to prevent coalitions above alliance level impossible, unfortunately I don't see how that is possible. |
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
4339
|
Posted - 2015.02.26 23:05:14 -
[14] - Quote
Quote:Forum rules17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.
Closed.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |