Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1119
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 18:40:43 -
[31] - Quote
Eli Stan wrote: 2. If some system was worth taking, you have to work (structure grind) for it. Now you are going to make it simple and almost effortless.. Burn system, flip to Free Port. Wait for new residents. Burn. Repeat.
(Mean while hold the moons and make the real ISK)
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Gizznitt Malikite
agony unleashed Agony Empire
4244
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 18:56:21 -
[32] - Quote
The Op's post makes my head hurt...
I'm simply making a post to let CCP know they are doing a good job and to keep up the hard work. Don't listen to the craptastic rant of the Op. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2133
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 18:57:44 -
[33] - Quote
Veryunstable wrote:You know, in my humble opinion, for the most part, EVE worked just fine up until about a year ago. When a recipe for a chicken soup is perfect, you DO NOT keep changing it, you will ruin it. Usually if the soup has been in the fridge for years, even rose-tinted glasses wont make it taste any better than it was before. |
Reiisha
Repracor Industries
729
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 20:08:59 -
[34] - Quote
Veryunstable wrote:You know, in my humble opinion, for the most part, EVE worked just fine up until about a year ago. When a recipe for a chicken soup is perfect, you DO NOT keep changing it, you will ruin it. Sofar you lost about what, 5% of subscriptions because of key broadcasting. 1. You talk a constant plan of ship balancing and at the same time you bring out a destroyer that can outrun missiles with cruiser sized prop mods. 2. If some system was worth taking, you have to work (structure grind) for it. Now you are going to make it simple and almost effortless. 3. I guess you want more fighting, which I can agree with, but the reason there is so little of that now is because there are basicly only 3 or 4 giant sized alliances that don't really want to tangle with each other. Right now, if X alliance of 8,000 members wants to take a area of null, they can WITHOUT help. If alliances had a reasonable maximum cap of say like 3,000, then they might have to ask for assistance from another friendly alliance in their coalition. But the other friendly alliance may not agree to risking ships for that purpose cuz they might have their own goals. I think that would cause more smaller fleet fights. 4. One other way to cause more fighting would be to put a set amount of minerals on the R32 and 64 planets, say like enough for 4 to 6 months worth at non stop mining. Then when it runs dry, another of the same kind would respawn randomly somewhere else. By randomly I mean NOT ALWAYS in CCP's friends corner. Like what seems to happen with pricely blueprints and etc. At the rate of speed you are going, I would almost bet the basic death of EVE within a few years. Would it hurt to FOCUS on what the mass majority of players want instead of flatly ignoring your customer base and only doing things just a few select friends think?
1) They addressed the Svipul and already mentioned a balance pass. 2) If it means an actually fun system instead of an utterly boring and mind destroying grind - Please! If it means that massive AFK empires can't hold space without actually defending it anymore - Please! 3) Sov changes will take care of this. 4) Agree. Depletable moons, when they do deplete, the resource moves to a random other place.
Otherwise, take off your tinfoil hat and help make the game actually fun instead of complaining about details and arguing to keep massive blunders of game design.
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...
|
Iroquoiss Pliskin
Hedion University Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 23:55:10 -
[35] - Quote
Quote:1) They addressed the Svipul and already mentioned a balance pass.
Could we get a source on that? I heard about T3Ds in general, but in what light it was said - hard to tell. |
Kiryen O'Bannon
Silver Guardians Fidelas Constans
227
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 00:35:45 -
[36] - Quote
Veryunstable wrote:You know, in my humble opinion, for the most part, EVE worked just fine up until about a year ago. When a recipe for a chicken soup is perfect, you DO NOT keep changing it, you will ruin it.
We can stop right here. Your fundamental assumption is based entirely on your personal preferences. The evidence is that EVE was "perfect" is not one shared by many people and the suggestion that EVE should act based on your personal opinion is ludicrous.
Eternal Father, King of birth, /Who didst create the heaven and earth, /And bid the planets and the sun/ Their own appointed orbits run; /O hear us when we seek thy grace /For those who soar through outer space.
|
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30899
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 00:51:51 -
[37] - Quote
A plausible reason why CCP would suddenly be willing to cut off the fat would be the possibility that a player will only purchase one copy of special edition things like the CE (which is dirt cheap now), regardless of their number of accounts. If the business model is adjusted slightly from monthly subscriptions to microtransaction vanity items, it makes complete sense for CCP to wean itself from multi-account (per player) income.
Help, I can't download EVE
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1120
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 00:58:36 -
[38] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:A plausible reason why CCP would suddenly be willing to cut off the fat would be the possibility that a player will only purchase one copy of special edition things like the CE (which is dirt cheap now), regardless of their number of accounts. If the business model is adjusted slightly from monthly subscriptions to microtransaction vanity items, it makes complete sense for CCP to wean itself from multi-account (per player) income. Alts will exist as long as there are viable play denial tactics
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30899
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 01:01:37 -
[39] - Quote
Do you have something you'd like to say about afk cloaky?
Help, I can't download EVE
|
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
386
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 01:56:54 -
[40] - Quote
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:War Kitten wrote:I'm gonna go way out on a limb and disagree with just about everything you said OP.
Have a nice day. I like your hair. OP has no hair at all!
I like your post. Don't give a fuk what the op thinks. |
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1962
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 02:21:40 -
[41] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Alts will exist as long as there are viable play denial tactics Alts are also no longer as tied to unique accounts with MCT allowing 3 training characters on a single account. Meaning you don't need to keep as many accounts active to keep your characters ticking over. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
16166
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 08:29:53 -
[42] - Quote
Veryunstable wrote:. 2. If some system was worth taking, you have to work (structure grind) for it. Now you are going to make it simple and almost effortless.
Unless the sov owners actually undock and then you'll have to, you know, put some effort in.
Why shouldn't totally undefended sov be "effortless" to take?
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!"
|
Iroquoiss Pliskin
Hedion University Amarr Empire
44
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 10:11:13 -
[43] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Veryunstable wrote:. 2. If some system was worth taking, you have to work (structure grind) for it. Now you are going to make it simple and almost effortless. Why shouldn't totally undefended sov be "effortless" to take?
Indeed. In very fact, that is a Maxim of Life.
Pertaining to Law & Civil Rights, it goes like this - Equity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights.
Or how we say it in EVE: Didn't want that region, anyway!
( -í° -£-û -í°)
|
Ned Thomas
Signal Cartel EvE-Scout Enclave
1214
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 12:01:59 -
[44] - Quote
Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:Quote:1) They addressed the Svipul and already mentioned a balance pass. Could we get a source on that? I heard about T3Ds in general, but in what light it was said - hard to tell.
The D3's were singled out as a class that was a little too good and in need of a rebalance, along with assault frigates needing a rebalance to make them more viable. Other than that, no details. Just talks of how their view of balance is more based on ship classes as a whole rather than specific ships.
Wouldn't expect anything until after the remaining D3's are released, and even then they'll probably want to wait a bit for more data before tapping them with the nerf bat.
And while I agree that the D3's are very good, they aren't these invincible killing machines that everyone keeps b*tching about.
Don't get lost alone - Join Signal Cartel, New Eden's premier haven for explorers!
Onward to Thera with Eve Scout
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
The Volition Cult
1122
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 12:56:54 -
[45] - Quote
Ned Thomas wrote:Iroquoiss Pliskin wrote:[quote]1) They addressed the Svipul and already mentioned a balance pass. And while I agree that the D3's are very good, they aren't these invincible killing machines that everyone keeps b*tching about. First of all, a good destroyer has the tank of a frigate with the damage of a cruiser.
Now these things not only have 33% rather than total 25% bonuses, they can change their bonuses according to what is chasing after them. So, the only way to kill them with a very small group is to send one or two D3s after them or to send a counter to each mode after them. Effectively needing 3+ T2 frigates to grab them and then some others to pile on and kill it.
People who try to solo them (in something other than another D3) are kited away and killed far better than the usual ships fulfil that tactic.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids.
.
SOV is stagnant because Low Sec is not the next step from High Sec and a viable place to grow alliances to the point they can challenge Null alliances.
Fozzie is treating a symptom.
|
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30901
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 23:13:02 -
[46] - Quote
Why would Destroyers have the DPS of a Cruiser? They're supposed to kill Frigates, and this hardly requires Cruiser DPS.
Help, I can't download EVE
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |