EVE Search - *New* Addition of abundant Nullsec Ore Anomalies (?) at Fanfest 2015

All Channels

Science and Industry

*New* Addition of abundant Nullsec Ore Anomalies (?) at Fanfest 2015

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 8	Posted - 2015.03.20 06:20:10 - [1] - Quote Greetings, Now, sit tight, but I'm pretty sure I heard that during the Game Design panel speech yesterday, one of the devs said that Nullsec would be getting some new type of rocks that would yield ALL of the materials required for the construction of most ships in proportion to their requirments. Meaning: Same asteroids yielding both base ores and high-end. Also talked about - the removal of base ores like Veldspar from nullsec completely. Am I imagining this, or is this the case? Full March 19th Fanfest Day 1 stream can be viewed here: http://www.twitch.tv/ccp/b/638754943 I am trying to locate that particular presentation. Regards,
Gimme Sake State War Academy Caldari State 58	Posted - 2015.03.20 06:24:12 - [2] - Quote Doesn't that lead to stagnation?
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 8	Posted - 2015.03.20 06:25:40 - [3] - Quote Gimme Sake wrote: Doesn't that lead to stagnation? Elaborate. Because I see it as dynamic - more production in null - more trade hubs there, leading to more minerals reserved for the Empire space -> cheaper ships & modules = Equals more PVP.
Gimme Sake State War Academy Caldari State 58	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:11:52 - [4] - Quote From the perspective "I have all I need right here, no need to do anything else.". Sounds more like a "skeleton key" type of resource. ( -í° -£-û -í°) Hi, I'm Blob and I like to Blog.
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 10	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:19:36 - [5] - Quote Which is perfectly fine, considering the risks and logistics involved. Sov will be ping-ponged a lot in the new system, so don't view it as a safe haven which will be built upon. Many moons ago, the Delve region was the most desirable people of real estate due to its moon resources - All of Eve converged on it, resulting in the destruction of Band of Brothers. I'm expecting the same this time around, especially, when various 0.0 regions won't by in sync with respect to resources: Make only 3-5 regions the most desirable under the new ore system, among other things, and you will have EVE on fire. Disclosure: I don't live in Nullsec. Can't say I'm not planning to.
Gimme Sake State War Academy Caldari State 58	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:30:44 - [6] - Quote As long as they're not available in every region and system it seems fine, although it should be a a totally random and not predetermined occurrence. ( -í° -£-û -í°) Hi, I'm Blob and I like to Blog.
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 10	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:34:18 - [7] - Quote Gimme Sake wrote: As long as they're not available in every region and system it seems fine, although it should be a a totally random and not predetermined occurrence. Oh that's for certain, the devs can make a few random number generator rolls as to which regions get 'em and then settle on a permanent configuration/distribution that would go live on TQ, which would provide the most dynamic player content.
Gimme Sake State War Academy Caldari State 58	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:41:59 - [8] - Quote Now it sounds like fun. ( -í° -£-û -í°) Hi, I'm Blob and I like to Blog.
Chenguang Hucel-Ge Exiled Tech Space Monkey Protectorate 17	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:54:14 - [9] - Quote Well, maybe they'll fix Drone Regions, too. Someday, yeah.
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 10	Posted - 2015.03.20 07:58:46 - [10] - Quote Chenguang Hucel-Ge wrote: Well, maybe they'll fix Drone Regions, too. Someday, yeah. I've never been interested in the history, demographics and geology of that area due to dddrone loot mainly and secondly due to the distance from the Galactice core Empires relative to other Nullsec. Tell me, though, how many Drone regions are there in total? Five, Seven? Let's say that the two of these get VERY lucrative resources - now that's fun. Edit: Current Sov holdings map - http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/verite/influence.png ; Coalitions map - http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/coalitionsov/Coalitioninfluence.png My proposal for the 5 uber regions: just One in the North, One in the South, Two in the East, One in the West. Game. Set. Match.
Agondray Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces 252	Posted - 2015.03.20 13:52:11 - [11] - Quote having new ore would only be good for miners that are to busy either going on CTA or mining Ice to keep pos and caps fueled "Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
Huttan Funaila GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 375	Posted - 2015.03.20 14:48:01 - [12] - Quote GankYou wrote: Meaning: Same asteroids yielding both base ores and high-end. Also talked about - the removal of base ores like Veldspar from nullsec completely. It is a bit early to get excited about it since there isn't anything definite enough to analyze. In my part of null, mex is the limiting factor for producing things. It was also the limiting factor when corps I was in were located in Fountain and Immensea. I find it interesting that I'm usually mining Kernite, Jaspet, Hedbergite and Hemorphite out in nullsec.
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 5057	Posted - 2015.03.20 17:49:11 - [13] - Quote to correct the transcript a little, it was CSM Mynnna, (not miners) The idea is to rebalance the ores available, to adjust where the bottlenecks are. Right now, nullsec production seriously bottlenecks on the lower end ores (mid end? you know what I mean) Which has people mining the highends for export, over producing, and tanking that market. Which has problems for the values of those ores. I'd like to see larger changes happen, but those would require a relatively significant time investment, so not soon. Woo! CSM X! Fuzzwork Enterprises Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn Department 10 221	Posted - 2015.03.21 10:57:30 - [14] - Quote I haven't watched the talk on nullsec Sovreignty yet but I doubt CCP would want to have sufficient availability for all the minerals in null, low, high, and WH systems. It would as another pointed out potentially cause stagnation and would go against the risk and conflict driver principles. I can see why you think they would do that as it would placate the nullsec community but whether it would be good in the long term is doubtful. " They're gonna feel pretty stupid when they find out. "-áRick. " Find out what ? "-áAbraham. " They're screwing with the wrong people. "-áRick. Season four.-á-á ' The Walking Dead. ' .
Thomas Mayaki Perkone Caldari State 50	Posted - 2015.03.21 16:32:50 - [15] - Quote Steve Ronuken wrote: Right now, nullsec production seriously bottlenecks on the lower end ores And yet Nullsec were able to produced all those Titans? There is no bottleneck, perhaps they could use some of those minerals used in building 'unique' titans for more standard ships instead.
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 16	Posted - 2015.03.21 17:16:15 - [16] - Quote Thomas Mayaki wrote: Anybody else getting sick of all the Nullsec buffs? Why CCP wishes to nerf highsec mining is a mystery to me. I guess those highsec miners isk/hr is just too high. There you go, my professional analysis as to why mining in null space should be a lot more profitable than anywhere else: highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec
Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn Department 10 222	Posted - 2015.03.21 17:47:45 - [17] - Quote Ekaterina 'Ghetto' Thurn wrote: I haven't watched the talk on nullsec Sovreignty yet but I doubt CCP would want to have sufficient availability for all the minerals in null, low, high, and WH systems. It would as another pointed out potentially cause stagnation and would go against the risk and conflict driver principles. I can see why you think they would do that as it would placate the nullsec community but whether it would be good in the long term is doubtful. Hmm. I watched the replay via Twitch TV of Fozzies talk on Sov changes. Looks like I was wrong and CCP have capitulated . I guess, or hope, they know what they are doing. " They're gonna feel pretty stupid when they find out. "-áRick. " Find out what ? "-áAbraham. " They're screwing with the wrong people. "-áRick. Season four.-á-á ' The Walking Dead. ' .
Thomas Mayaki Perkone Caldari State 50	Posted - 2015.03.21 18:29:12 - [18] - Quote GankYou wrote: Thomas Mayaki wrote: Anybody else getting sick of all the Nullsec buffs? Why CCP wishes to nerf highsec mining is a mystery to me. I guess those highsec miners isk/hr is just too high. There you go, my professional analysis as to why mining in null space should be a lot more profitable than anywhere else: highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec Who says its not?
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 17	Posted - 2015.03.21 19:42:08 - [19] - Quote Thomas Mayaki wrote: GankYou wrote: Thomas Mayaki wrote: Anybody else getting sick of all the Nullsec buffs? Why CCP wishes to nerf highsec mining is a mystery to me. I guess those highsec miners isk/hr is just too high. There you go, my professional analysis as to why mining in null space should be a lot more profitable than anywhere else: highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec highsec Who says its not? Edit: Apart from Gankyou that is. Compared to other nullsec activities, nullsec mining has been in the pit for years. You want cheap Zydrine & Megacyte for your Empire needs? I have one thing to say: BUY THEM NOW.
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 21	Posted - 2015.03.22 19:58:41 - [20] - Quote Steve Ronuken wrote: to correct the transcript a little, it was CSM Mynnna, (not miners) Steve Ronuken - of https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk? Didn't recognise you at first. My hat off to you, as I am sure we will see on many things eye-to-eye. Quote: The idea is to rebalance the ores available, to adjust where the bottlenecks are. Right now, nullsec production seriously bottlenecks on the lower end ores (mid end? you know what I mean) Which has people mining the highends for export, over producing, and tanking that market. Which has problems for the values of those ores. I'd like to see larger changes happen, but those would require a relatively significant time investment, so not soon. Completely agree. Have you any thoughts on Lowsec mining? In my travels I've encountered a few mining corporations in Kor-Azor, Khanid regions - they specialise in mid-ends, which in my opinion, is going to be the place to be in the future if one lives in Empire space. Some shakeup in the form of pirate eviction and increased escort would have to happen to such regions, however. Aridia, Khanid, Genesis and other non-FW regions aren't exactly safe to mine in at the moment.
DooDoo Gum Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 57	Posted - 2015.03.25 08:42:12 - [21] - Quote Chenguang Hucel-Ge wrote: Well, maybe they'll fix Drone Regions, too. Someday, yeah. LOL they had it way too good for way too long....
GankYou Redshield Holding Company 47	Posted - 2015.04.02 03:14:45 - [22] - Quote Hello, ladies und gentlemen. The following is reiteration by CCP Fozzie on yesterday's o7 Show on Fanfest Nullsec Mining presentation, along with very relevant information regarding this whole shebang. Starts at minute 21:00 - http://www.twitch.tv/ccp/popout?videoId=a644494144 CCP Fozzie wrote: So it's more profitable... so that you don't need to ship in lowends, and you won't have such access of high ends, that drop the price. We want to give a similar ratio of minerals in nullsec to what you would use to do all the building. ... We're updating composition ratio of existing ABC ores and every existing ore in nullsecks. and, CCP Fozzie wrote: We need to actually catch up some of the industry in Eve to match the original goals for the consumption of minerals - one of the things that has been slowing down in nullsecks mining, is that the consumption of high ends - Megacyte and Zydrine wasn't as high as originally intended to be relative to everything else. So, actually in our end of APRIL patch we are going to be, with a couple of small exceptions, doubling the usage of Megacyte and Zydrine in every blueprint in the game that has any of those. Uncel Dolan sends his regards. Regards, GûæGûæGûæGûæGûäGûäGûäGûäGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûäGûäGûäGûäGûäGûä GûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûæGûæGûÇGûÇGûä GûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûæGûæGûê GûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûäGûêGûêGûÇGûäGûäGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûäGûäGûäGûæGûæGûæGûê GûæGûÇGûÆGûäGûäGûäGûÆGûæGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇGûÇGûäGûäGûêGûæGûæGûæGûêGûêGûäGûäGûêGûæGûæGûæGûê GûêGûÆGûêGûÆGûäGûæGûÇGûäGûäGûäGûÇGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûê GûêGûÆGûêGûæGûêGûÇGûäGûäGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûÇGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûäGûæGûæGûäGûÇGûÇGûÇGûäGûÆGûê GûæGûêGûÇGûäGûæGûêGûäGûæGûêGûÇGûäGûäGûæGûÇGûæGûÇGûÇGûæGûäGûäGûÇGûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûê GûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûÇGûäGûÇGûêGûäGûäGûæGûêGûÇGûÇGûÇGûäGûäGûäGûäGûÇGûÇGûêGûÇGûêGûêGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûêGûêGûæGûæGûÇGûêGûäGûäGûäGûêGûäGûäGûêGûäGûêGûêGûêGûêGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûÇGûäGûæGûêGûæGûæGûæGûêGûæGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûäGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûÇGûäGûäGûäGûêGûäGûêGûäGûêGûäGûêGûäGûÇGûæGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûäGûäGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûÇGûäGûäGûæGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûÆGûæGûê GûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûÇGûäGûäGûäGûäGûäGûæGûæGûæGûæGûæGûê

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.