EVE Search - CLOAKING DEVICES - change.... make them FUEL DEPENDANT!!!

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

CLOAKING DEVICES - change.... make them FUEL DEPENDANT!!!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zion Sax Crash Code Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 10	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:06:48 - [1] - Quote Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped.
Iain Cariaba 1194	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:12:18 - [2] - Quote And it's a two-fer. Two threads in a row I've had to report for redundancy. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. I couldn't have said it better.
Jehavu Crash Code Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 0	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:15:12 - [3] - Quote Yeah I like the idea. Cloaky camping is part of the game we accept that but there should be a way to combat it; or at least give the corps involved an opportunity to use PvP as a way of getting rid.
Paranoid Loyd 4394	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:17:16 - [4] - Quote Sigh, INB4 more renters "Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata Fix the Prospect!!!
Baaldor Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 255	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:20:11 - [5] - Quote Miners, mission runners and ratters should have a session timer and need fuel of some sort to continue to care-bear. Put a limit to the the time a pilot can care-bear....could be interesting from a PvE point of view as well as time management when being in full care-bear mode.
Mag's the united 19169	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:20:57 - [6] - Quote Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Iain Cariaba 1194	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:24:58 - [7] - Quote Mag's wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Because he's a risk averse carebear who would rather have CCP make it so no one can interrupt his nullbearing, as opposed to actually defending his right to nullbear. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. I couldn't have said it better.
Zion Sax Crash Code Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 10	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:29:08 - [8] - Quote Iain Cariaba wrote: Mag's wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Because he's a risk averse carebear who would rather have CCP make it so no one can interrupt his nullbearing, as opposed to actually defending his right to nullbear. Well limiting a cloak on a cloaky camper would actually make me able to scan him down and kill him - which I'd gladly do.
Danika Princip GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3279	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:30:51 - [9] - Quote I, too, wish to nerf the hell out of every single covert ship going because I'm terrified of someone not even at their keyboard. Oh, wait, no I don't. I'm not that terrible at EVE.
Mag's the united 19170	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:32:00 - [10] - Quote Zion Sax wrote: Iain Cariaba wrote: Mag's wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Because he's a risk averse carebear who would rather have CCP make it so no one can interrupt his nullbearing, as opposed to actually defending his right to nullbear. Well limiting a cloak on a cloaky camper would actually make me able to scan him down and kill him - which I'd gladly do. So he's right then. Glad we cleared that up. Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.
Saladiin WiNGSPAN Delivery Services 6	Posted - 2015.03.26 21:55:41 - [11] - Quote Make all active modules require fuel. There, my effort(less) suggestion. On a serious note, it looks like observation post structures will be tailored for carebears wanting to deal with afk-cloakies. So this idea doesn't have any legs because CCP has something up its sleeve already.
Grezh The Scope Gallente Federation 34	Posted - 2015.03.26 22:00:36 - [12] - Quote Covops are currently the only way for explorers to survive in hostile nulsec and scouting often requires long periods of cloaked time to gain useful information about your target. The only idea where covops would need fuel I would support would be something that does not require being close to a trade-hub to obtain reliably. If you had instead stated that the cloak would have a script to harvest the fuel while decloaked I would have considered it.
Iain Cariaba 1196	Posted - 2015.03.26 22:03:36 - [13] - Quote Zion Sax wrote: Iain Cariaba wrote: Mag's wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Because he's a risk averse carebear who would rather have CCP make it so no one can interrupt his nullbearing, as opposed to actually defending his right to nullbear. Well limiting a cloak on a cloaky camper would actually make me able to scan him down and kill him - which I'd gladly do. You don't have to scan him down to kill him. Bait him out and kill him. Hell, a PvP fit ishtar isn't that much slower at running anoms than the afktar. Nothing irks cloaky campers more than when you utterly ignore them and bear away with them in system. EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid. I couldn't have said it better.
Zion Sax Crash Code Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere 10	Posted - 2015.03.26 22:11:09 - [14] - Quote Iain Cariaba wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Iain Cariaba wrote: Mag's wrote: Zion Sax wrote: Cloaking devices should be changed to be fuel dependant like with ancillary shield boosters and ancillary armor reppers. Fuel suggestion Liquid Ozone Put a limit to the time a pilot can be cloaked..... could be interesting from a PVP point of view as well as defensive view when being cloaky camped. Why? Because he's a risk averse carebear who would rather have CCP make it so no one can interrupt his nullbearing, as opposed to actually defending his right to nullbear. Well limiting a cloak on a cloaky camper would actually make me able to scan him down and kill him - which I'd gladly do. You don't have to scan him down to kill him. Bait him out and kill him. Hell, a PvP fit ishtar isn't that much slower at running anoms than the afktar. Nothing irks cloaky campers more than when you utterly ignore them and bear away with them in system. dude - there are times when baiting just don't work - in the past we've had a cloaky camper that just sat there for over a month. Bating is obvious - we do that, but sometimes there that one guy that have no life. Besides at some point you just live with the risk and go about doing your stuff. Also - I'm not affriad of risking any ship - once it leaves the undock I consider it lost. That's how I see it. But I appreciate all the assumptions on how I do stuff.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode ISD Community Communications Liaisons 4862	Posted - 2015.03.26 22:26:20 - [15] - Quote Quote: Forum rules 17. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked. As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread. Closed. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.