Lol, tears, you sound like Loyalanon's sidekick.

Code was never about ganking some pathetic miners and haulers. It was about creating a popular movement to fundamentally change the risk/reward balance in highsec, and force PvE players into low/null. And in that is has failed in every possible way.

The PvE players keep on winning, Code keeps on flailing about, and Code leadership keeps changing faster than a pair of smelly socks.

A forum full of Veers Belvar tears sais we are relevant and winning.

Ya, so winning that you invested considerable effort in running a candidate for CSM to fundamentally change highsec, becaue it is rapidly slipping away from you.

I'll take delusional Code rhetoric for 100.

We have fun at the game while you are docked and crying, sounds like winning to me.

Lol....fun??? You spend 90% of your time crying about risk/reward in highsec...and why on earth would I dock up for you? Your anti-incursion campaign flopped spectacularly.

Not to burst your bubble lad, but maybe that so called "incursion campaign" you been going on about was only important to you? Maybe they don't give a &^%$ about you or your activities. Maybe they just have better things to do than stroke your ego.

Just a thought.

Not to burst your bubble lad, but maybe that so called "incursion campaign" you been going on about was only important to you? Maybe they don't give a &^%$ about you or your activities. Maybe they just have better things to do than stroke your ego.

Just a thought.

Perhaps, on the other hand they designed a whole contest about it, raised significant funds for prizes, hyped it upped repeatedly on their website, and organized gank fleet after gank fleet, only to meet with crushing failure.

So no, this wasn't a case of not trying, this was a case of trying and failing, over, and over, and over again.

So much for "elite PvP" and the rest of that tripe. Code met the best - and it wasn't even close.

Buying shares is meaningless...it just shows that a few bored rich people support griefing. When it came to the true test of support - voting - your true support count was revealed.

Excuses there are many, but facts speak louder than rhetoric. Code ran hard, and lost harder.

As for my supporters, see the highsec PvErs elected....it's clear who truly speaks for the people.

And I have no need to shut you down, the csm elections did that perfectly, by exposing you as a griefer group with nary a sliver of true popular support. Keep on losing, you are so good at it.

Oh yeah by the way if you actually went to the link, you would see there is more then just a "few" supporters. There has to be hundreds of names there of people who bought shares. You lose again.

I patiently await your next volley of tears

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

Guys stop we are being mean and insensitive. I have solved Veers

Link

"are more" not "is more," "than" not "then." And of course, many of these "supporters" may simply be alts of a single player, or the may be folks who were scammed into purchasing shares like miner TrueVolley was, or they may be facade characters who never actually play - ever seen Anti-Mining Activist, for one?

And to be clear, buying a few shares is not a real indication of support. Where it really matters, at the ballot box, Code failed spectacularly, while the highsec PvE players just kept on winning.

I don't see how the changes to null will disrupt CODE at all.

You keep saying that, but GSF has how many candidates on the CSM? Who is our biggest supporters again? Who runs and/or participates in most of our freighter/orca ganking fleets? I'll give you a hint, it isn't high sec carebears, or anyone in your movement. You lose yet again.

Also, please provide proof of your accusations that anyone was scammed into buying shares, or that anything on our shareholders page being falsified or made up.

Once again, I await your next volley of tears

You keep saying that, but GSF has how many candidates on the CSM? Who is our biggest supporters again? Who runs and/or participates in most of our freighter/orca ganking fleets? I'll give you a hint, it isn't high sec carebears, or anyone in your movement. You lose yet again.

Also, please provide proof of your accusations that anyone was scammed into buying shares, or that anything on our shareholders page being falsified or made up.

Once again, I await your next volley of tears

hardly means that GSF =/= Code.

Thanks for proving my point :P

Unless you meant to say "hardley means that GSF=Code", since we are playing grammar **** :)



That article shows to me that someone was not following the code and plotting against the New Order (A very serious offense), and got punished by getting his mining permit revoked along with losing his merc fee. Seems pretty clear-cut and legit to me. Once again you lose.

I patiently await your next volley of tears

If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.

Congratulations on your first grammatically correct post while correcting somebodies grammar veers.

somebody's

Actually no. I kind of set you up for that. Someone's is the correct way to say that Veers. I feel a little guilty for it but you did deserve it. Go back and learn your English better before imposing your faulty version.

got dat m8?

If you understood emphasis it would be clear...and it's "hardly" not "hardley." An agent of the New Order should always use proper spelling and grammar...you disappoint me.

The article clearly shows a miner being scammed out of 1 billion isk, and that money being used for share purchases. To wit, an unwilling and unsupportive shareholder. How many more hundreds are out there? Just another example that owning shares doesn't make you a Codie.