|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Nemtar Nataal
   |
Posted - 2006.11.06 10:20:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: starship enginer
eg: 3200mm tungston, [2x HP of 1600mm] with 1.5k PG and 30 odd cpu [i think this is needed since we are seeing crusiers and BC with more than BS native HP
Hmm i might just bee mistaken but dont plates already give you about 30% more hp then a shield extender. I know that a lot of the new things in kali favore shield appose to armor especially caldari but a 3200mm plate whould be like 70% more then the corrosponding shield tanking equipment. Faster shield recharging with the extenders do make up for some om the 30% lost ground but extending that even further sounds like it would favore armor tanking a little to much...
|
Nemtar Nataal
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 11:18:00 -
[2]
Originally by: HankMurphy
Edited by: HankMurphy on 26/10/2006 22:38:07
Regarding the minnies vs others:
Hyperion shouldn't be faster than Maelstrom. Not w/o a MWD.
Rokh should be as equal of a sniper as temp and mega, NO better. Yeah, they wanted a sniper but why make it better than all the others? We dont have any 6 msl turret bs's or 8 midslot bs's, no one gets an equivelent to Caldari, why should Caldari get an equivelent/better ship than our best?
Maelstrom's SB bonus is crap, i think we all (including tux) can agree on that. A HP boost is kinda dumb too. I guess it will stick though unless they can find a more appropriate bonus, (plz god dont change it to TP bonus)
Because the caldari have the BIGGEST HUMP of flying scrap metal (next to minmatars dread/carrier/titan), snipers rely on shooting a couple of targets and then getting the F*** out of there...lets see what happens when you have a ship with about twich the over all size as all the other sniping ships in EVE....afcause its goig to be vulnable just in another way then the tempi or the mega...arguing that one rases ship can be bether the another is not really a good argument as a lot of ships in eve rivel each other and people tend to forget that 
|
Nemtar Nataal
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 11:20:00 -
[3]
including a XL extender would properly just give caldari a upper hand with bether pasive tanking aswell....i still say that xl shield extenders should be left out of the game after all caldari have got a XL booster to compensate for the "lack" of shield HP.
|
Nemtar Nataal
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 13:55:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Nemtar Nataal on 06/11/2006 13:57:47
Originally by: Ishina Fel
Also. Has it occured to you that maybe, that XL extender could be suitably balanced against new plates to NOT totally pump passive tanking off the scale?  Less crying murder, more logic, please.
 first of all dont quote me as a cry baby...really doesnt soot this discusion...
Second have you considered that a XL extender might just be used on a BC add the room for extra modules which will give way for more whining from pilotes who do not try and pasive tank a caldari ship?
Third we really dont need to add modules to the game that potentially will allow a BS to tank like if it was a capital ship. Ships in eve can tank so much and if thats not enough you need to move up to another ship level.
After adding 3200mm plate and a XL extender i suppose that people will start complaning about why there are not a XL armor rep...
|
|
|
| |
|