| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Grimpak
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Ascendant Frontier
   |
Posted - 2006.10.26 21:17:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Grimpak on 26/10/2006 21:16:51
now, I don't know if the rocket->siege ratio of time to empty a clip is the same as the standard -> cruise launcher.
however in the ships & mods DaemonBarber in this thread stumbled upon the following:
 Originally by: DaemonBarber
Edited by: DaemonBarber on 26/10/2006 20:52:31
Edited by: DaemonBarber on 26/10/2006 20:29:12
Some numbers for thought, using EVE-O Item database w/o taking any skills or bonuses into account:
Rockets:
0.4 Clip / .01 per Missile * 3.2 RoF = 128 Sec of Firing
Standards
1.5 Clip / .03 per Missile * 12 RoF = 600 Sec of Firing
Heavy Assault
1.5 Clip / .06 per Missile * 6.4 RoF = 160 Sec of Firing
Heavies
2.4 Clip / .06 per Missile * 12 RoF = 480 Sec of Firing.
To recap:
Rockets: 128
Standards: 600
Heavy Assault: 160
Heavies: 480
Ratio Between Standard and Heavy (600 / 480 ) = 1.25
Ratio Between Rockets and Heavy Assault (128 / 160) = 0.80
Ratio Between Standards and Rockets (600 / 128) : ~4.68x
Ratio Between Heavies and Heavy Assaults ( 480 / 160 ): 3x
Make sense?
Edit:
No - it doesn't make any sense, cause I F'd up the numbers... Fixed now.
now this raises some questions to me:
was this taken into account?
is it good enough like this, or would it be better to approach the rocket->heavy assault to the same ratio as the standard -> heavy launcher?
-------
Originally by: Tiuwaz
for caldari perception weapons that hit up to 100km are short range weapons 
|
Lucian Corvinus
Gallente
Expert Systems
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:21:00 -
[2]
Yeah, seems to me that rockets could use a larger clip size...
TUX please unnerf the rockets
|
Kapitanleutnant Mei
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:26:00 -
[3]
heavy assault clip size could do with a bump up to say 40 per clip for a T2. 3 sec rof is hindered by having to re-load every 75 seconds.. unless you stagger your launchers I guess which would make for intelligent missile combat :O
|
Grimpak
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Lucian Corvinus
Yeah, seems to me that rockets could use a larger clip size...
TUX please unnerf the rockets
actually my point was to decrease the heavy assault clip
...unless the heavy assault->torpedo ratio is equivalent to the heavy launcher -> cruise missile ratio.
-------
Originally by: Tiuwaz
for caldari perception weapons that hit up to 100km are short range weapons
|
Grimpak
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:28:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Kapitanleutnant Mei
unless you stagger your launchers I guess which would make for intelligent missile combat :O
..now I don't know about you, but there's something wrong in this sentence that I can't quite pinpoint...
-------
Originally by: Tiuwaz
for caldari perception weapons that hit up to 100km are short range weapons
|
Lucian Corvinus
Gallente
Expert Systems
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:35:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Lucian Corvinus on 26/10/2006 22:35:21
Well if my calculations are about right, I get torps and cruise to this:
Torp
4.0 Clip / .2 per Missile * 19.20 RoF = 384 Sec of Firing
Cruise
2.7 Clip / .1 per Missile * 17.6 RoF = 475 Sec of Firing
So this would give you:
Ratio Between Heavy and Cruise (480 / 475 ) = 1.01
Ratio Between HAM and Torp (160 / 384) = 0.41
Don't know what you could say about these numbers
|
Grimpak
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.10.26 22:37:00 -
[7]
then it seems that this thread was made for nothing
-------
Originally by: Tiuwaz
for caldari perception weapons that hit up to 100km are short range weapons
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |