| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
66
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 04:38:59 -
[1] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:Drop Concord protection in incursion systems. Leave the income as is. Need no other changes to the incursion mechanics. Make your 200+ isk/hr, now you deserve it. Not sure why anyone would ever go to one of these over one in actual lowsec.
Lowsec would still be higher risk. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
67
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 05:14:50 -
[2] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:
Besides, if you want to do something about HS incursions and their risk factor then do it. Mechanics exist in this game that allow you to create risk for them. If you choose not to employ them, then you are literally no better than the guys who complain endlessly about gankers, and if ISK/HR is so god damn important to you, and your definition of fun...then go run HS incursions, there is literally nothing stopping you from doing them.
Why, exactly, would I or anyone else gank the incursions we are profiting from? We ARE doing them. That's how we know the imbalance exists. That's what you don't get, an imbalance doesn't stop being an imbalance just because people partake in it. I also have an alt in the Tribal Liberation Front flying a purifier and making more isk in an hour (in LP that gets dumped when we are at tier 4 or greater) than incursions and null anoms combined. An imbalance compared to what exactly? As far as I know incursions also exist in Lowsec, and Nullsec. So where exactly is this imbalance? Also I didn't say anything about ganking them... think outside of the box friend. (also please don't include me with "you guys" thanks. I have never done a single incursion, and probably never will.)
You want me to Logi the Sansha? Lol, mate, just laughing at that possibility... |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
67
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 05:32:35 -
[3] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:
Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
Doesn't work. I would love to see a source for that. Works on every other NPC in the game, NPC list also includes Sanshas Incursion Rats. Of course you probably haven't actually attempted it. Neither have I, but I have gone into missions and repped rats others were shooting. So ya, source please.
Just tried it, doesn't work. "interference" cited.
So that leaves ganking and wardecs. And wardecs don't work. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
67
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 05:40:07 -
[4] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:
Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
Doesn't work. I would love to see a source for that. Works on every other NPC in the game, NPC list also includes Sanshas Incursion Rats. Of course you probably haven't actually attempted it. Neither have I, but I have gone into missions and repped rats others were shooting. So ya, source please. Just tried it, doesn't work. "interference" cited. So that leaves ganking and wardecs. And wardecs don't work. Super gay. Oh well sorry NS guys I tried to help ya out. Guess you will just have to keep complaining about the system they just buffed 6 months ago.
Np thanks. And fwiw, I live in highsec. This isn't about sec (ie null/vs/high) it is just about risk/reward imbalance for me. Add some risk and I could agree with the rewards. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
67
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 05:44:28 -
[5] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Repping NPCs gets you CONCORDed or a warning from the GMs.
Unlike you who just talk like an idiot I actually tried repping NPCs ... ... not Sanshas, but that doesn't matter ... ... and it's verboten, because ... ... well I forgot.
That was in 2011 or something?
So go ahead and rep them. Do it. Be a winner.
lol
You're all idiots. If anyone cared qbout change, they should cut incursion income to a quarter and then readjust eventually.
BECAUSE NO ONE OF YOU HYPOCRIT LIARS ACTUALLY PLAYS FOR THE FUN OF IT YOU ALL JUST PLAY FOR THE GODDAMN MONEY! YOU PEOPLE ARE THE WORST OF THE WORST!
Any and all discussions are pointless, because you incursion runners have no honesty in you.
You just talk out of your asses just because you are greedy monsters.
Goons should come to highsec and just end all incursions ASAP.
We all will laugh at your tears of rage you stinking, worthless carebears.
Sol on a rampage GG
|

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
68
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 05:57:54 -
[6] - Quote
Better yet, donate that Plex to PLEX4GOOD.
Do that and I'll give you that value in warships.
|

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
68
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 06:06:37 -
[7] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:Better yet, donate that Plex to PLEX4GOOD.
Do that and I'll give you that value in warships.
You wished. "BUT I NEED THAT MONEY TO PLEX MY ACCOUNTS HOW CAN YOU ASK ME TO WASTE IT???" Or... "Oh sure here have a PLEX see I'm a good person!" ... not mentioning the hundreds of billions they have already. That's the reality of greed!
imho Funny thing is, people who really need the most ask for the least. And those who give from the heart never need tell others.
Ppl need it, don't matter who gives it. Just do what you can. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
69
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 06:16:55 -
[8] - Quote
^^ok.
As to the OP, incursion income is out of whack in HS, related to other activities. I would increase the risk, and leave income potential at the current levels. Remove Concord response in incursion systems. Let the players dictate the risk levels. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
70
|
Posted - 2015.04.28 06:51:31 -
[9] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:^^ok.
As to the OP, incursion income is out of whack in HS, related to other activities. I would increase the risk, and leave income potential at the current levels. Remove Concord response in incursion systems. Let the players dictate the risk levels. then you might as well go to lowsec. honestly most players risk billion isk+ ships to run incursions, but if they don't ever lose them then I guess that isn't much of a risk. but that risk gets hard to quantify as not losing a ship depends on other players doing their role. most of my incursion experience was running VGs at off peak hours, and as far as that goes I'd rather just run lv4 missions. maybe these days the communities are better and you can do HQs/Assaults or whatever you do at more hours so that would be one thing, but also that HQs have a double? payout of VGs. and then there are scouts which got "buffed" but apparently to a state where they are useless.
I have yet to ever ask anything be "nerfed", especially incomes. In a way, this would be asking for a "buff" to PvP, by removing the NPC oversight during (sigh) an NPC event.
Why not throw in the Drifters/Sleepers, and belt rats too and make it an NPC fest, and we can all sit around and watch the NPC's fight each other. And then fight each other to scoop up the loot drops...
Less NPCs all around, it is supposed to be PvP is it not? Or maybe I joined EvE for all the wrong reasons....? Sighs...
|

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
71
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 00:37:34 -
[10] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote: one persons buff to pvp is another persons nerf to income. Lowsec incursions get better payouts as a compensation for the additional risk, and well I'm not so sure how often they actually get run. Hell I've seen people complain 0.0 incursions aren't worth doing either.
and just because some people are doing PVE here, doesn't mean there aren't people doing pvp there. as much as some people want pvp everywhere all the time, there are plenty of people who don't, and I'm okay with that.
Everyone I know in lowsec would rather NOT have incursions there, it just spoils their PvP battles.
One last try at compromise:
My Momma always had a wooden spoon as a weapon. Give the Sansha Momma a Lux Kontos. And somebody done made Momma mad... |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
73
|
Posted - 2015.04.29 23:36:46 -
[11] - Quote
Joe Atei wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:So apparently, a few hundred people in highsec can make a full third as much as the entire rest of the game combined... But some people think that's just fine.  If it was real life where the money was being generated between people, yea, it would be unfair, but this is a video game where money is literally printed out of thin air via PVE. Other means of acquiring money are secondary to this one true fact. The real world is far more complicated than this and people that DO accumulate a stupid amount of wealth never really contribute it back into the economy, unless you count investments in stock, cds, etc. But at the end of the day, that helps a small percentage of people and not the grand majority. Even worse, some of them just let it sit. That's why it's not such a big deal if some individuals in a video game can make so much isk, at least for me. After a certain point it truly becomes worthless on an individual level.
There is a big economic difference between wealth accumulation, and wealth creation. Wealth creation creates some pretty bad effects, if there is not enough destruction of wealth.
Of course, you could also get filthy rich, and then biomass your character and take it with you!  |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
75
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 14:31:25 -
[12] - Quote
Druze Okaski wrote: Reading all that's been said the best options to lower the income of Incursion runners are the following:
1. Run the Incursions yourself. More competition lowers individual income. (Works on the market as well as we all know.) .
  
The "if you can't beat them, join them" logic is always a flawed argument.
Otherwise we would all be flying with Baltec1 or (insert other giant Alliances here).
Another way to put it: You don't end greed by being more greedy than the other guy. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
76
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 17:48:13 -
[13] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:I thought EVE was supposed to be harsh. Let's pretend for a sec that the usual suspects are actually right about high sec being safer than null (demonstrably false). If that were the case, why should the rewards be better in null? It's ******* harsh, remember? You want the freedom to be a douche, you pay the price for it. You work harder and fight over scraps. The easy money should be in the safer places. Why do you people have it so backwards in your twisted little minds? There should be no incursions in null and very few in low sec. CCP should move level fives back into high sec as well. Mr Epeen  i usually have to agree with what you say as you usually talk sense but i dont know what happened here. why put effort in to fight over scraps your idea just kills eve And yet, people are willing to "play" hours in TiDi for this "crap" space. I'm not even gonna try to make it out to be better than high-sec but it sure has enough value for people to endure this in the name of a space flag...
People went to Antarctica to plant their flag! Never underestimate the desire of people to suffer to extremes to say "mine", or "I was there first".
edit: what did Kennedy say? GÇ£We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard." |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
76
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 21:02:03 -
[14] - Quote
GankYou wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Carrie-Anne Moss wrote:
Eve was founded on risk=reward
It was a neat idea that never worked. CCP never really made anything for it so you could almost say it's not a DEV supported idea. And yet, all resource acquisition from Highend base minerals, to bottleneck T2 materials along with T3 still do operate under such a concept. It has been so for as long as I can remember.  But then again, these resources have to find their ISK, or rather the other way around - the ISK inflows minus sinks, ideally, have to be matched to the amount of procured resources per unit of time - and during most of 2014 that was 25-30 Trillion ISK per month looking to park itself. I'd love to see a lot more of that kind of data.  If nothing is changing with respect to the topic at hand, then it can be safely assumed that the metric that they have says the system is balanced, because apart from Lvl 4 measly bounties & Agent reward, along with Incursions there is no active ISK incomes in Highsec, and without active ISK incomes, the transfer of wealth from Highsec to entities who control the aforementioned resources would be rather disastrous, since Highsec doesn't have many resources that the rest of New Eden needs.  And no, most of the commodities on the LP stores of both FW and Lvl4s are a net sink in the economy - they don't print ISK.
Damn, and here I was hoping destruction of assets was the #1 Isk sink... |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
76
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 21:20:04 -
[15] - Quote
GankYou wrote:A sink is something that disappears ISK in its entirety out of the system - http://i.imgur.com/wybDyAB.png
Taxes, Skillbooks, BPOs, LP store costs. Any ISK that is exchanged on the player markets is just its healthy breathing through the economy, as the net doesn't change on such transactions, apart from Sales Tax & Broker's Fee deductions, of course.  CONCORD here acts as a central bank system with many regional banks, essentially expanding credit to anyone - just like banks had done on sub-prime loans. You all know what happens to asset prices when everyone gets the credit they desire.  CCP have to be applauded at their efforts here, especially during the ISBotter period.
Understood, it doesn't change the money supply when **** gets blown up Also why LP stores are an isk sink.
As to the imbalance of more faucet then sink, would that likely be attributed to hoarding?
|

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
76
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 21:33:12 -
[16] - Quote
GankYou wrote: Please expand on the topic further - what do you mean by hoarding?
Edited my post. With extra isk being added every day, we would have rampant inflation. So where is all that extra isk going, if not into the market?
By hoarding, I mean that people are saving it, and not spending it. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
77
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 21:43:16 -
[17] - Quote
GankYou wrote:Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:GankYou wrote: Please expand on the topic further - what do you mean by hoarding?
Edited my post. With extra isk being added every day, we would have rampant inflation. So where is all that extra isk going, if not into the market? That is indeed a very interesting question, and as I've said, this ISK ideally needs to be "matched" to the rate of resource acquisition, such as ores, moon materials, salvage, various loot like Deadspace/Faction/Meta modules, Pirate ship BPCs - resources in other words.  Quote:By hoarding, I mean that people are saving it, and not spending it. That is indeed, in part, the case but the resources are still being acquired, and are always there for you to pyrchase - they haven't disappeared. The general wealth of the EvE players can then be said to be increasing, on both sides of the equation. Therefore, we need a VERY, VERY Good War right about now - to get the Animal Spirits excited, and to make people spend their ISK and explode gloriously in spaceships.  Just like the real economy, eh. 
Agreed |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
78
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 22:08:36 -
[18] - Quote
Hmmm, (puts on tinfoil hattery)
If I had a theory: I might surmise that CCP (as the Central Bank) likes to sell plexes as it is good for real revenues. A high plex price (in isk) is more incentive for $ purchases. Now who would be the players most likely to take plexes off the market and consume them for game time? Why people with an isk printing mechanic, and accounts to train and maintain.
Ergo, I might come to the conclusion that high-income incursion fleets are deemed 'good for business', and otherwise left to exist as they are. Soft caps limit the overall effect, and if the data can coincide with the faucets of plex consumption, taxes and training... (removes hattery)
...eh, just go out and blow some **** up! |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
79
|
Posted - 2015.05.06 22:44:22 -
[19] - Quote
GankYou wrote:We're all trying to build EvE that will outshine the Glory days of the Second Great EvE war.  P.S. Possibly inappropriate thread for this - but it's all impossibly interconnected: You start with discussing incomes, you get to faucets, which takes you to the greater economy, which takes you back in a full loop. 
Sometimes you can compromise (balance) and other times you just have to draw a line in the sand.
We want a great game, and at the same time one that endures. Happy 12th birthday EvE |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
82
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 04:00:49 -
[20] - Quote
This still going? 
It is not about high, low or null. It is all about lack of risk.
Just add risk. Some drifters, Momma with a Lux, or allow other ppl to do it. Some random (or targetted) 'splosions.
Keep the community. Hell, keep the riches.
Just blow some **** up already. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
83
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 04:55:47 -
[21] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Kashadin wrote:
3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.
I was in FW at it's inception in 2008, and it wasn't like that, in fact no one did FW missions then. CCP WAY over-buffed the FW rewards, in part because many of us short sightedly (myself included) complained that there were no rewards for being in FW. The problem isn't the farming community, it's that CCP stuffed rewards into something that was supposed to mainly be about pvp. Now there are lots of people who don't give a damn about FW in FW farming, and that's a shame. FW was glorious in the beginning, all we were really asking for was a way to sustain ourselves while being in FW and CCP responded with an unbalanced gold mine that screws everything up.
At least ships explode in lowsec and there are people hunting. That you have to use a cloaky bomber to avoid that is indicative of the risks. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
83
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 05:57:41 -
[22] - Quote
Kashadin wrote: The bomber has nothing to do with needing to avoid people (tho it helps) and more to do with the BS size weapons on a frig size hull that can sig tank a entire room of a LVL 4 mission while blitzing it. And the fact that you can do this with several missions in a single run in a decent amount of time for a large pay out. At least on the minmitar side, the caldari and galente FW have some problems with this because of the EWAR they go against, and the last time I looked at FW the amarr pay outs weren't worth the effort tho that could have changed.
Could you tank these missions in a blinged out Golem or a navy BS? If so, wouldn't the payouts be faster? |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
83
|
Posted - 2015.05.12 13:31:34 -
[23] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: I wouldn't call it risk honestly. Bombers are best but you can do the missions in any number of ships, including Caracals. All you have to do is buy a stack of caracals and enough fittings to fit them out and just spend them like candy. hell, when I jump into an Amarr militia gate camp I don't even try to make it back to the gate, I just let them kill the ship, Pod me back to Hek (I chuckle when i think "these guys are sending me to HEK lol) and simply attack my travel route backwards.
It's insane, we should not be able to make 100-250ish mil per hour with a Caracal or Stealth bomber we don't give 2 filps about if it dies. In defense of incursions , at least you need a BS for that unbalanced monstrosity, but FW missions are the number 1 messed up PVE thing in EVE. CCP could fix FW missions by making them at least not be blitzable (if you have to clear the field of NPCs instead of killing a couple BSs or haulers or a structure, the massive amount of LP rewarded would make more sense).
I'ma keep farming till CCP does something, but it's really dumb how they have it now. There are WHOLE ALLIANCES in FW that play both sides of a conflict and actively manipulate which side is allowed to "win" for isk farming purposes, it's a perversion.
Gotcha, see how that works now. The fix isn't so radical for CCP either. |

Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
83
|
Posted - 2015.05.13 23:57:32 -
[24] - Quote
Joe Atei wrote:Vennicea wrote:It is actually quite amusing to see the heat that this topic is creating.
Unfortunately it appears that neither side will budge & this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip.
Time for me to do something productive. Well, forums were never a place for real debate. I mean, once people realize they can't convince you of their point of view they start to throw insults around and claiming their point of view as the absolute truth and anyone who disagrees is either stupid or lying It's so disgusting I retired the grand majority of my interest in this thread. The forums make me want to quit the game, so I take a break when I feel it's time.
Disagree. What is missing is the ability to say "I stand corrected" or "Hey I learned something, thanks".
Stalemate is "we agree to disagree"
A forum is not always a competition, unless you make it one. And even then you "gf" when you lose a fight
btw, insulting or attacking your opponent directly is a "loss" in any proper debate. Always attack the argument ftw. I can agree with a sound argument regardless of who is posting it. |
| |
|