| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saint Lazarus
   |
Posted - 2006.11.04 18:24:00 -
[1]
Just wondering if anyone else would think this module needs some improvements, I'd find a filter system for it really useful as I'm usually searchin for a particular type of Ore but EVERY little bit of Ore shows up, clutters it up and makes it harder not only to find the roid you want but harder to keep track of the amount of Ore in the roids you have targetted, just like a simple feature to let me choose what types of Ore (filter out the Veldspar  ) to scan for and maybe a marking on the window which tells you which ones you have targetted so you'll know when to cycle the lasers, which is really important on a retriver as I hate wastin a 3 minute cycle to get 100 omber when I could be gettin 3000 on a fresh one
So is there already a way to do this? I know you can hover the pointer over the roid in the window of the scanner but that just points the camera at it and actually I find the camera switchin and movin around more annoyin than anything..., so does anyone think it would be a good idea to improve the survey scanner a bit?, wouldnt be a huge advantage or anything just make things a little easy and less cluttered for us miners 
:insert cool signature here: |
Prodigy Z
ZiTek
Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2006.11.05 15:46:00 -
[2]
I agree this is somewhat painful especially in Empire when there are so many roids within 15km. Not such a problem in 0.0 but definatly a problem in empire.
|
Benjamin Olson
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 01:02:00 -
[3]
It would be too easy to find targets, you would set only ships on your scanner and find a ratter in a matter of seconds. Not like you cant find a ratter in a few seconds anyways, but now it would be in the 15-45s range.
|
Trition Vallcer
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 02:40:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Benjamin Olson
It would be too easy to find targets, you would set only ships on your scanner and find a ratter in a matter of seconds. Not like you cant find a ratter in a few seconds anyways, but now it would be in the 15-45s range.
Wrong type of scanner Benjamin Olson.
and yes the survey scanner results window could use a little update to navigate it more efficiently
|
Saint Lazarus
|
Posted - 2006.11.06 20:43:00 -
[5]
*Bump 
And yeah thats all I'm asking a little more efficiently, I really dont see how it make things too easy or change anything just make it less annoying 
:insert cool signature here: |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |