It's possible. You misunderstood the entire thread.

This seems to be a refrain. The burden of communication falls most heavily on the speaker or poster to be clear, concise and unambigous. Telling everyone who reads it differently than you intended that they need to re-read the thread, or that they have misunderstood the thread, etc. probably means you need to clarify the idea, and provide examples of exactly how your idea should work in a live environment. That you see half or more of people who attempt to engage in the discussion misunderstand you should be sending up alarm bells that you aren't communicating effectively.

I'd love to see you clearly elaborate your ideas, because I like many of the core concepts. I would like to like your ideas, but because they are either unclear, or because you try to railroad a single interpretation of ambiguous phrases without clarifying which way it is meant to work. I can't. The dismissal of disagreeing statements, or people who read what you wrote without a direct tap into your intentions, in fact, makes it nearly impossible.

You look like a fool

Considering the post I made about clear communication has more likes than every post you have made in this thread combined, maybe you should consider that there are other people who agree. You are quickly on the way to the same level of credibility as Dryson.

without a direct tap into your intentions, in fact, makes it nearly impossible.

To help improve industry further.

Ask your questions, if there are any.

I will answer them in a professional manner.

This new feature would be advantages to miners and provide additional income at higher risk to their ships.

yessssss, give those in null more ability to control/destroy markets while still mining in relative safety. there needs to be additional clauses to malcanis law:

1) any changes to mining providing more yield/hr will have a negative effect on the market

2) any changes to mining providing more yield/hr becomes competitively mandatory, mining is a minimax game

3) any mining changes meant to increase risk will have little to no effect to bears in sov space, making clause 1 more pronounced, and reinforcing clause 2

more clauses welcomed from informed individuals. its not just about noobs, in fact the "noob" player description of malcanis' law can easily be replaced by "highsec bears"