EVE Search - Could be wrong, but it seems to be so smoother

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Could be wrong, but it seems to be so smoother

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Splagada Minmatar Tides of Silence	Posted - 2006.11.17 12:35:00 - [1] Edited by: Splagada on 17/11/2006 12:36:09 no module lag, no annoying stuff at gates. i click to do A, it does A, not waitwaitwaitwaitA :p it changes everything i feel like it's another game lol never had so few lag especially after a DT where usually it goes bad for a few hours ------ relaxed corp looking for members
Mirasta Caldari Enigma Enterprises Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.11.17 12:37:00 - [2] Edited by: Mirasta on 17/11/2006 12:37:13 \o/ great news, needs testing in a fleet fight though. Of couse, You are now reading my sig.
Rafein Eye of God Axiom Empire	Posted - 2006.11.17 12:48:00 - [3] not enough people on to rally get a feel either. Wait till prime times this weekend.
Vicarrah Minmatar Three Kind Buds	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:17:00 - [4] think about it for a minute.... pre update - roughly 110 nodes for 5000 systems (say 4000 populated), average of 36 systems per node post update - roughly 160 nodes for the same systems, average of 25 systems per node now my figures are rough, but thats still an estimate of about 1/3 less cpu drain per node. gotta love it. Vicarrah Tahiri Advisor
Sakura Nihil Tabula Rasa Systems The Star Fraction	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:23:00 - [5] Edited by: Sakura Nihil on 17/11/2006 13:23:37 Originally by: chromer one 350 in local fleet fight at station and node handled it.. lag was bad but not impossible thx ccp. fleet fights just got new meaning. Exxxcellent. "Titans were never meant to be cost-effective, they're a huge ****" - Oveur
chromer one FinFleet Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:23:00 - [6] 350 in local fleet fight at station and node handled it.. lag was bad but not impossible thx ccp. fleet fights just got new meaning.
s73v3n2k Caldari UK Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:32:00 - [7] Originally by: Mirasta Edited by: Mirasta on 17/11/2006 12:37:13 \o/ great news, needs testing in a fleet fight though. i think we can say we just put that to the test in 1v- 430 people in local before the node crashed.
KillerDream	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:36:00 - [8] Market actions are running very nice :)
LoxyRider Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:37:00 - [9] Originally by: s73v3n2k Originally by: Mirasta Edited by: Mirasta on 17/11/2006 12:37:13 \o/ great news, needs testing in a fleet fight though. i think we can say we just put that to the test in 1v- 430 people in local before the node crashed. The fact is the upgrade will help a lot in general playing terms. But in the end any number of nodes wont change them crashing when you have such a large number fighting in one system. That needs new code with kali or a whole new generation of hardware. But things are looking up, cant wait for the new gang code to take a serious strain off the server.
Cypher XIII	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:38:00 - [10] Nah, 2nd engagement at said station and node crashed like always. Well, we can only hope Kali helps.

Ishquar Teh'Sainte Euphoria Released Euphoria Unleashed	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:45:00 - [11] i bet it can handle now 80 vs. 80 fleetbattles without problems ... well - i bet 10isk that next we the standard fleetbattle will be 120 vs. 120 ___________________ -Skellibjalla- Life is a garden of perceptions. Pick your fruit.
Patch86 Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance	Posted - 2006.11.17 13:59:00 - [12] Its all very nice, but.........MORE NODES!!!!!!111!!1!1!elventyone!1! I won't be happy until theres 1 node for every system in EVE -----------------------------------------------
Splagada Minmatar Tides of Silence	Posted - 2006.11.17 14:02:00 - [13] Originally by: s73v3n2k i think we can say we just put that to the test in 1v- 430 people in local before the node crashed. 430 is pretty extreme ------ relaxed corp looking for members
MolRob Caldari Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.11.17 14:06:00 - [14] Edited by: MolRob on 17/11/2006 14:07:14 I remember the gallente titan event, there were a lot (400?) of people in one grid. It was laggy sure, but the server did not crash and i could still play. Back in the FA days sometimes there were 100+ man blobs and the server was not nearly that crap what it used to be these days. I understand that we got more players and stuff, but we also got better and more hardware. I seriously dont know what CCP is doing Well. I hope Kali is going to fix EvE
Kazuma Saruwatari	Posted - 2006.11.17 14:12:00 - [15] bad code? Unlikely Kali will be able to fix something as basic as bad coding in the first place, unless its a big enough change.

Sharkbait	Posted - 2006.11.17 15:07:00 - [16] there is alot of new code in kali, including alot of optimizations and other things that address performance issues. i know sisi is uber laggy but that is something that is being looked into and will be resolved before the launch of kali. Spank You later

Zurtur Minmatar	Posted - 2006.11.17 15:28:00 - [17] Originally by: MolRob Edited by: MolRob on 17/11/2006 14:07:14 I remember the gallente titan event, there were a lot (400?) of people in one grid. It was laggy sure, but the server did not crash and i could still play. Back in the FA days sometimes there were 100+ man blobs and the server was not nearly that crap what it used to be these days. I understand that we got more players and stuff, but we also got better and more hardware. I seriously dont know what CCP is doing Well. I hope Kali is going to fix EvE Yeah, i remember having atleast 100vs100 fights back in Curse war, and it never crashed, and was barelly laggy (compared to how it is now) and we have much more/better hardware and all the optimalizations in place. So why do i have a feeling that old EvE code was "better" then new one is? Or is it just simply by having so much more database entries and content and playerbase? (even those that are not actually loged on or present in battle) Z - Originally by: Phrixus Zephyr When my armor repair's itself, then you can come moan about that.
Major Stormer Caldari Demon Womb	Posted - 2006.11.17 15:30:00 - [18] Originally by: Sharkbait there is alot of new code in kali, including alot of optimizations and other things that address performance issues. i know sisi is uber laggy but that is something that is being looked into and will be resolved before the launch of kali. Awesome news, thanks!
Brugar Minmatar Raging Phoenix Incorporated	Posted - 2006.11.17 16:09:00 - [19] This is great news. Now, imagine what it will be like when the BK's are gone. Schweeeet!
Ishquar Teh'Sainte Euphoria Released Euphoria Unleashed	Posted - 2006.11.17 16:13:00 - [20] Originally by: Zurtur Originally by: MolRob Edited by: MolRob on 17/11/2006 14:07:14 I remember the gallente titan event, there were a lot (400?) of people in one grid. It was laggy sure, but the server did not crash and i could still play. Back in the FA days sometimes there were 100+ man blobs and the server was not nearly that crap what it used to be these days. I understand that we got more players and stuff, but we also got better and more hardware. I seriously dont know what CCP is doing Well. I hope Kali is going to fix EvE Yeah, i remember having atleast 100vs100 fights back in Curse war, and it never crashed, and was barelly laggy (compared to how it is now) and we have much more/better hardware and all the optimalizations in place. So why do i have a feeling that old EvE code was "better" then new one is? Or is it just simply by having so much more database entries and content and playerbase? (even those that are not actually loged on or present in battle) Z not sure .. but i heared that long long time ago such things like tracking weren't implemented - so maybe they implemented such features after the battles you remember. wouldn't be surprised if tracking/hit chances would take quite alot of computational power. ___________________ -Skellibjalla- Life is a garden of perceptions. Pick your fruit.

Kharakan Amarr GREY COUNCIL Breidablik	Posted - 2006.11.17 16:58:00 - [21] Originally by: Splagada Originally by: s73v3n2k i think we can say we just put that to the test in 1v- 430 people in local before the node crashed. 430 is pretty extreme looks around for siigari Mmkay, I'll do it. "430 isn't pretty extreme... it's EXTREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEME!" Originally by: Joshua Foiritain (to Dark Shikari) HAHAHA I KNOW YOUR ACCOUUNT NAME TIME TO DIE this signature space is claimed in the name of eris, haha I got to him first. neeneer
Dark Shikari Caldari Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2006.11.17 17:09:00 - [22] "How many people are on the node?" "OVER NINE THOUSAANNNDDDD!!!" "WHAT?! NINE THOUSAND?!" -[23] Member- Awesome new space games site, from the editor of E-ON!
Kharakan Amarr GREY COUNCIL Breidablik	Posted - 2006.11.17 17:22:00 - [23] Originally by: Dark Shikari "How many people are on the node?" "OVER NINE THOUSAANNNDDDD!!!" "WHAT?! NINE THOUSAND?!" You've gotten obsessed with that, haven't you? Originally by: Joshua Foiritain (to Dark Shikari) HAHAHA I KNOW YOUR ACCOUUNT NAME TIME TO DIE this signature space is claimed in the name of eris, haha I got to him first. neeneer
Eno Matterre	Posted - 2006.11.17 19:32:00 - [24] engages warp drive Nothing has changed, the game lags as it lagged and in the same moments it lagged previously. Additional: I'm doing missions. disappears in warp on a more serious note, you guys are showing too much optimism.
xeom Veto.	Posted - 2006.11.17 19:36:00 - [25] Originally by: Dark Shikari "How many people are on the node?" "OVER NINE THOUSAANNNDDDD!!!" "WHAT?! NINE THOUSAND?!" On another note i can't find that episode anywhere ='( --- "Those nuclear missiles are for domestic heating." - Scagga
Auman Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.11.17 19:39:00 - [26] Originally by: LoxyRider Originally by: s73v3n2k Originally by: Mirasta Edited by: Mirasta on 17/11/2006 12:37:13 \o/ great news, needs testing in a fleet fight though. i think we can say we just put that to the test in 1v- 430 people in local before the node crashed. The fact is the upgrade will help a lot in general playing terms. But in the end any number of nodes wont change them crashing when you have such a large number fighting in one system. That needs new code with kali or a whole new generation of hardware. But things are looking up, cant wait for the new gang code to take a serious strain off the server. I "think" Sharkbait said that the node crashes we'd experienced in PS weren't load related and they were trying to figure out why they have been going down at all. Of course I could have just eaten a lot of cheese one night and dreamt it


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.