| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
144
|
Posted - 2015.06.11 22:19:55 -
[1] - Quote
Bookmarks and scan results is (almost) everything we ever use fleet warp for in W-space.
Why not remove it all together and be done with it? |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
144
|
Posted - 2015.06.11 22:20:56 -
[2] - Quote
Teebeutel wrote:I dont see the problem that a lot of people seem to see for wormhole fleets, using corp bookmarks and having fleet members warp to those individually should do just fine. Only if they are propagated for all client, which due to ****** CCP code, can take up towards 10 minuts. |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
144
|
Posted - 2015.06.11 22:28:40 -
[3] - Quote
Teebeutel wrote:Steven Hackett wrote:Teebeutel wrote:I dont see the problem that a lot of people seem to see for wormhole fleets, using corp bookmarks and having fleet members warp to those individually should do just fine. Only if they are propagated for all client, which due to ****** CCP code, can take up towards 10 minuts. Wasn't there something about creating a private bookmark refreshing corp bookmarks locally or something silly like that? Just tested it, doesn't look like it. |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
146
|
Posted - 2015.06.12 00:40:32 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote: Both of these points are solid. Corbexx brought these up while we where talking to the CSM about the change. Regarding slowing down the speed of sites, given the potential profitability of wormhole space, we don't consider this a major negative. Regarding movement fleets though WH space, we have something we're working on for this. That said some of the feedback we've received is mixed. Reducing power projection though WH space (for both WH residence & passes though) not seen as all bad.
The speed of the fleet will, if these changes goes trough, be dependent on how fast the corp bookmark propagates. Imo. that is a horrible design goal and I hope you agree? Please don't make us dependent on the worst parts of your game.
Now, we can use fleetwarp to put outrfleet at that BM our scout just made for us. With these changes, our fleet will have to sit there and wait for 10-15 minuts until CCP decided that the last fleet member could get the bookmark. Your bad code/lack of processing power/whatever it is, will become the important factor of the engagement instead of the pilots skills to quickly formup, get in position etc.
We are already working against the time here due to those horrible changes you did to how WHs spawn and how the scanner automatically warns the people about new signatures. These changes would make those horrible changes even worse. |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
151
|
Posted - 2015.06.12 03:54:16 -
[5] - Quote
Manfred Sideous wrote:Luft Reich wrote:I see our wormhole CSM is valiantly defending the life style of people in wormhole space....  Yeah, it might be good for nullsec but have you really thought about the effects on wormhole space? Clearly not. Warping yourself or warping to Wwwww's in fleet Zomgz life is over . Hey Manny... Go bother CCP to fix their code so we can get instant bookmarks.. Also, remove titan bridges and nerf supers.. k thx..
Manfred Sideous wrote:Calm down , forgive me for having a little fun. The CSM are players who volunteer our time out of love for the game. I am not professional and will not be professional or political. Feel free to do us all a favor.. and quit.. thx.. |

Steven Hackett
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
177
|
Posted - 2015.06.12 23:21:34 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:Hi Mates, The original post has been updated with a few more Q&A's answering some of your questions. We've got a lot of amazing feedback and we're going to go back to the CSM with some ideas. Expect an update next week. Have a great weekend! Please don't. We would like this change to be reviewed by an objective team who will take all of EVE into account, and not just butter their own bread.
Miss EVE 2015 popularity contest isn't a good venue for that sort of things. |
| |
|