| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Feng Schui
Minmatar
Republic Military School
   |
Posted - 2006.11.26 11:46:00 -
[1]
went over to sisi a couple minutes ago, and I  , heh
Could I recommend the following rigs, for us miners, please!
Mining Duration Rig, decreases the duration of mining lasers
Mining Power Rig, increases the range of mining lasers
Mining Electrical Rig, decreases the CPU requirements of mining lasers
Mining Yeild Rig, increases the yeild amount of mining lasers
ya know, for us carebears out there :)
|
Rafein
Eye of God
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 12:13:00 -
[2]
what would be drawback?
|
Jongo Fett
Caldari
Imperial Space Corporation
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 12:15:00 -
[3]
cpu useage of lasers
|
Feng Schui
Minmatar
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 12:21:00 -
[4]
CPU for most of them, I would say reduced range for the Electrical rig though.
|
Wiggy69
5punkorp
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 12:32:00 -
[5]
I approve of this post!
-----
Wiggy's Bad Spelling and Grammar Complaints Department |
Rafein
Eye of God
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 12:49:00 -
[6]
would remove the CPU reducing rig, but I'm all for it.
Also would have to consider giving barges a bit more CPU, as they are a very tigt fit as of now.
|
Hertford
Ars Caelestis
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 13:08:00 -
[7]
Having CPU as the drawback works, but it feels a bit too 'typical', in that the mining upgrade modules work in a similar fashion (improved mining for a CPU penalty). And as CPU is a problem on some mining vessels, it becomes more of a CPU/mining juggling act when fitting, whereas rigs on combat vessels gain something in one area in return for a penalty in another.
Of course, the problem is that mining vessels only really care about one thing: yield. They're currently slow, made of paper (well, most are), cargo capacity isn't an issue, speed and agility don't figure much either. So yeah, some kind of CPU penalty seems the most obvious (and probably easiest) to implement.
|
Gaogan
Gallente
Solar Storm
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 17:30:00 -
[8]
/signed
Another possible penalty is a random chance for the laser to overheat and shut down. Or maybe a 5% increase in yield, but consumes the asteroid 15% faster, thus wasting 10% of it.
|
Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 20:16:00 -
[9]
Have the Drawback be cargo capacity?
 Originally by: kieron
The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
|
Garethjax
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 20:25:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Garethjax on 26/11/2006 20:25:45
Edited by: Garethjax on 26/11/2006 20:25:08
The drawback could be agility and/or speed. You can mine faster, but if you get caught, you're dead meat.
Edit: Or reduction in drone damage maybe.
|
|
|
Feng Schui
Minmatar
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2006.11.26 22:45:00 -
[11]
maybe have 10% shield or 10% armor resistance reduction be the drawback ?
|
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.11.27 00:11:00 -
[12]
Possible drawbacks:
CPU of Miners
Agility of ship
Cargo Capacity
Cap usage of Miners
Warp Strength (as in, -1 warp strength from the get go, would require 2 stabs to get 1 point of strength)
Targetting Range
etc.
Sounds like a good idea, and teres certainly no shortage of miner-hurting drawbacks they could have.
Heres a funny one- Mining Bonus Combat-Boosters? 
-----------------------------------------------
|
Dunpeal
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2006.11.27 01:24:00 -
[13]
it pains me to look to those yellow rays striking a dead rock...
theres just no miner in me lol
but i sign this one!!
some lOve for them miners 
Bow down, and i'll make your death even more painfull! At least die with some dignity
Maximum dimensions for signature images are 400w x 120h and 24kb file size. --Jorauk |
Kali Cortez
Eve Defence Force
Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.11.27 01:37:00 -
[14]
drawback : speed :D
so they take longer to get to warp
makes them stay longer in the belt and more ... you know  
Kali |
Vorgus
|
Posted - 2006.11.27 02:04:00 -
[15]
To be blunt, CPU penalty for any barge mod is a realy stupid thing to do. They are already so tight on power and cpu they can't make much use of the modules alreday in the game. The 2 mining boosting modules, use low slots and both power and cpu boosters ONLY fit low slots. So you can only use 1 mining boost module. The new mod type they came out with only adds 1 for mininers which is a mod to boost drone mining rate. And guess what, you take a cpu hit. It's a waste to use it. The 5% that a low slot gives to 3 striper 2's far outways what a 10% would do for 5 miner drone 2's. And since you have to use one of the low slots for a power boost to add much of anything, the other low slot is going to get a mining boost, not a cpu boost.
|
Daniel Jackson
Caldari
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2006.11.27 02:36:00 -
[16]
yes please add minign RIGS for the minignbarges atleast, they have rig slots as well so they should beable to have minign rigs for them insted of just the minign drone rigs
___________________
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |