Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
stoicfaux
6154
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 02:33:34 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Not that I want to destroy the thread or anything, but the Amarr Empire announcing that they're going to build a new flagship based on a pre-existing hull doesn't mean that we're going to introduce a whole new line of battleships to the game. Just heading that off at the pass, before people get too excited. Translation: the Drifters pwn the flagship and the Amarr write it (and its experimental tech) off as a failure. End of storyline/fluff.
The real question is whether the Empress survives politically after proving that once again she cannot protect her people from the Drifter threat.
Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
|
Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 02:42:27 -
[92] - Quote
Harrison Tato wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote: I may seem extremely angry all of the time, but it's really just that I am very passionate.
So was Adolph.
lol
|
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6727
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 04:01:21 -
[93] - Quote
A new super titan that will be rare and powerful, doubtless.
As a flagship, settle for nothing less than the ability to project a massive area of effect damage field though a cyno
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
793
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 04:10:06 -
[94] - Quote
Rob Kashuken wrote:Wonder where this new thing will sit in terms of the other special flagship battleships, such as the Raven State Issue, Tempest Tribal Issue, Megathron Federate Issue and the two Imperial Issues - the Armageddon and Apocalypse It's a MacGuffin. They won't release it just like they didn't release the Abaddon that fired the super-weapon at the battle of Mekhois. It's a one off plot driver that will be an Offscreen Moment of Awesome, an Epic Fail, Mock Guffin, or No Man Should Have This Power.
"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves."
The Trial - Franz Kafka-á
|
Rob Kashuken
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
79
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 07:03:09 -
[95] - Quote
Falin Whalen wrote:Rob Kashuken wrote:Wonder where this new thing will sit in terms of the other special flagship battleships, such as the Raven State Issue, Tempest Tribal Issue, Megathron Federate Issue and the two Imperial Issues - the Armageddon and Apocalypse It's a MacGuffin. They won't release it just like they didn't release the Abaddon that fired the super-weapon at the battle of Mekhois. It's a one off plot driver that will be an Offscreen Moment of Awesome, an Epic Fail, Mock Guffin, or No Man Should Have This Power.
Evidently trolling has found a new meta, so some good has come from this thread at least. |
Xerathul Muur
BOVRIL bOREers Mining CO-OP RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 12:45:34 -
[96] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Not that I want to destroy the thread or anything, but the Amarr Empire announcing that they're going to build a new flagship based on a pre-existing hull doesn't mean that we're going to introduce a whole new line of battleships to the game. Just heading that off at the pass, before people get too excited.
but Amarr gave capsuleers the new shielding technology for their stations, why not a battleship?? |
stoicfaux
6154
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 12:50:54 -
[97] - Quote
The flagship's name will be the Auctoritas. According to google, Auctoritas is a Latin word and is the origin of English "authority".
Thus I declare the nickname for the ship to be: The Cartman.
Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
|
davet517
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
111
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 13:02:35 -
[98] - Quote
We've got T3 doctrines. We've got BS doctrines. They get used with similar frequency, for different situations. They're comparable, price wise, since the battleships that we tend to use are of the FACTION variety, and that's true of other big PvP oriented outfits in null.
The problem that you're trying to solve is called "mudflation". Several years ago, nobody would have been "dumb" enough to fly a billion isk BS into a fleet fight, and would have been trolled as an idiot if they did. Now, it's common.
So, what's pushed your T-1 battleship into irrelevance is time, and accumulated wealth. If you want to nerf something, figure out how to nerf that. |
Doctor Knuckles
Black Fox Marauders Spaceship Bebop
139
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 13:41:18 -
[99] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
Tell me why a tengu, a cruiser, should have more EHP than a megathron but with a sig a quarter the size while moving almost six times faster.
because it seems to me people keep comparing T3 pimp fit tanks + being susceptible to 3 to 5 days wasted training vs basic battleship fit's tank, or shitfit all dps filling those lows with magstabs and TEs, also ignoring BS dps, range, volley, heavy neuts, drones, mjd
put 30 proteus vs 30 tempests or machs, give those t3 pimp fits, links, and slaves, and still all that tank isn't gonna mean **** when they get volleyd off field. |
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
432
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:01:58 -
[100] - Quote
Elinarien wrote:Perhaps an answer would be to give Battleships (and Marauders) additional hi-slots that can only be used to fit small-sized weapons - this way they're used as secondary armaments to deal with smaller vessels. I've always wondered by Battleships (and hence Dreadnaughts) don't have additional smaller secondary armaments to counter small fast moving vessels to reflect how large naval vessels deal with this problem in real life.
Of course I understand that drones fill that need, but maybe this is the time to consider re-working how larger-hulled ships deal with small-sized attackers.
Just a thought. Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online.
Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role
|
|
Anette Maricadie
Outer Rim Freelancing Inc
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:03:34 -
[101] - Quote
Elinarien wrote:Perhaps an answer would be to give Battleships (and Marauders) additional hi-slots that can only be used to fit small-sized weapons - this way they're used as secondary armaments to deal with smaller vessels. I've always wondered by Battleships (and hence Dreadnaughts) don't have additional smaller secondary armaments to counter small fast moving vessels to reflect how large naval vessels deal with this problem in real life.
Of course I understand that drones fill that need, but maybe this is the time to consider re-working how larger-hulled ships deal with small-sized attackers.
Just a thought.
Finally, someone that makes sense. Looking at Large combat seagoing vessels from the past, they often are armed with a multitude of different calibers. From large anti-ship/artillery cannons down to anti-air guns and anything in between for varying ranges. The RHM launcher is all fine and dandy, but what about ships that can't fit launchers? Either additional high slots get provided to equip "secondary armament" or sig radius for large guns get lowered.
On the subject of T3BS, yeah, no. I'd rather have a second marauder in every faction, utilizing that faction's secondary weapon system. (Missile/drone for Amarr, Hybrid for Caldari, Drone for Gallente, Missile for Minmatar). You have these amazing battleship hulls that rarely get used, the Abaddon is by far my favorite model in the game, so why not use them?
About T3C vs BS: The only change that could be done to T3Cs is give them a "tactical mode" system like the dessies, where offensive mode boosts offensive subsystems, defensive boosts defensive and so on. This would entail A LOT of balancing work and is, I feel, unlikely to happen. On the other hand, changing battleships should be easier.
Another thing battleships would need is some protection from "lesser" ships, as those often do the same amount of raw dps or more in some cases. I'd suggest "bouncing". Give battleships a chance to "bounce" shots, like in the old days tanks would bounce smaller shells (before Sabot/shaped charge became a thing). I mean, I can hardly imagine a rocket doing any damage to such a thick armor unless it strikes a particular weak spot.
Just my 2 cents. |
Anette Maricadie
Outer Rim Freelancing Inc
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:11:25 -
[102] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Elinarien wrote:Perhaps an answer would be to give Battleships (and Marauders) additional hi-slots that can only be used to fit small-sized weapons - this way they're used as secondary armaments to deal with smaller vessels. I've always wondered by Battleships (and hence Dreadnaughts) don't have additional smaller secondary armaments to counter small fast moving vessels to reflect how large naval vessels deal with this problem in real life.
Of course I understand that drones fill that need, but maybe this is the time to consider re-working how larger-hulled ships deal with small-sized attackers.
Just a thought. Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online. Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles.
You're not wrong, but it shouldn't be an easy choice, whether or not to attack a BS. Yeah, there are battleship hulls that *CAN* defeat smaller ships, but also those that got major issues with it or downright can't.
I doubt Stitch (or anyone for that matter) wants Battleships to wreck face on everything it encounters. I personally don't want to see a BS dealing 1k+ deeps with it's main guns and another 1k deeps with its secondary guns. That.is.silly. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
11877
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:22:51 -
[103] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Elinarien wrote:Perhaps an answer would be to give Battleships (and Marauders) additional hi-slots that can only be used to fit small-sized weapons - this way they're used as secondary armaments to deal with smaller vessels. I've always wondered by Battleships (and hence Dreadnaughts) don't have additional smaller secondary armaments to counter small fast moving vessels to reflect how large naval vessels deal with this problem in real life.
Of course I understand that drones fill that need, but maybe this is the time to consider re-working how larger-hulled ships deal with small-sized attackers.
Just a thought. Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online. Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles.
Perfectly well said. People ignore the past all the time, in this case they ignore WHY BSs made it to their current state compared to their 'solopwnmobile' beginnings. If you give battleships all the advantages people ask for, nothing else would be flown. It would be funny as hell if CCP nerfed the ishtar , and 10 years from now some clueless nub starts a thread about how Ishtars Suck and CCP really needs to buff them and sentry drones lol. It would be like Deja Vu.
As it is, players who are actually good can take single battleship hull and slaughter entire fleets of smaller ships even when those smaller ships are flown well. I wrote a lengthy post in another (train wreck) BS thread about my experience with another game and supposedly under used game items.
The TL;DR there is that if you buff something that is supposedly "underused" but that is useable by good players already, you create unbalanced monsters that those same good players can use to bludgeon the entire rest of the game world with. Imagine the Big Miker type solo BS pilot with one of these 'improved' battleships. it would be madness.
BSs are right where they need to be save maybe some minor tweaking like the Tempest just received. Doing more than that would be stupid.
|
Anette Maricadie
Outer Rim Freelancing Inc
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:31:23 -
[104] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:Elinarien wrote:Perhaps an answer would be to give Battleships (and Marauders) additional hi-slots that can only be used to fit small-sized weapons - this way they're used as secondary armaments to deal with smaller vessels. I've always wondered by Battleships (and hence Dreadnaughts) don't have additional smaller secondary armaments to counter small fast moving vessels to reflect how large naval vessels deal with this problem in real life.
Of course I understand that drones fill that need, but maybe this is the time to consider re-working how larger-hulled ships deal with small-sized attackers.
Just a thought. Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online. Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles. Perfectly well said. People ignore the past all the time, in this case they ignore WHY BSs made it to their current state compared to their 'solopwnmobile' beginnings. If you give battleships all the advantages people ask for, nothing else would be flown. It would be funny as hell if CCP nerfed the ishtar , and 10 years from now some clueless nub starts a thread about how Ishtars Suck and CCP really needs to buff them and sentry drones lol. It would be like Deja Vu. As it is, players who are actually good can take single battleship hull and slaughter entire fleets of smaller ships even when those smaller ships are flown well. I wrote a lengthy post in another (train wreck) BS thread about my experience with another game and supposedly under used game items. The TL;DR there is that if you buff something that is supposedly "underused" but that is useable by good players already, you create unbalanced monsters that those same good players can use to bludgeon the entire rest of the game world with. Imagine the Big Miker type solo BS pilot with one of these 'improved' battleships. it would be madness. BSs are right where they need to be save maybe some minor tweaking like the Tempest just received. Doing more than that would be stupid.
That vid (and most other vids I've seen of a BS eliminating whole fleets of smaller ships) uses RHML, which obviously isn't THE solution. In my personal view, a battleship should ALWAYS win vs a single smaller ship in prolonged combat. Not decimate or alphastrike ships, that'd just frustrate everyone and lead to griefing. The least a battleship should do is be able to take a ridiculous amount of damage and not solely rely on drones (which can be easily killed on non-droneboats) or RHML to deal with smaller vessels.
*edit* thanks for that link btw, epic soundtrack. |
Caiman Graystock
Confederation Navy Research Epsilon Fleet
51
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:44:33 -
[105] - Quote
Much sadness was had nüî
I was definitely hoping the increased drifter threat would lead to the development of new Tech II battleships based on the Abaddon/Rokh/Hyperion/Maelstrom and that this was the kick off for that. I guess not. One day maybe?
|
stoicfaux
6158
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 14:46:34 -
[106] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote: Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online.
Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles.
On the other hand, why bother creating battleships if they can only kill other battleships?[1] It's a bit of the "Paris Hilton is famous because she's famous" paradox.
What role do battleships provides nowadays? Glorified EHP sponges? Range projection due to large guns? Structure bashing? For fighting cap ships?
[1] Battleships CAN kill smaller ships. A better question is whether you're simply better off flying a smaller ship to kill smaller ships (that require less isk and training time to get into, have less damage application problems, and can actually warp somewhere in a reasonable amount of time.)
Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
|
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
432
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 15:28:00 -
[107] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote: Because EVE is not real life. Ship balance is important. Putting small and large weapons on a BS is silly. Why fly a frig, cruiser, dessie when you can fit a RHML/RLML typhoon FI to kill everything in a 50km radius while having 2 heavy neuts, MJD and 130k EHP. It would be insanely OP, and it would go from cruisers online to BS online.
Larger ships are supposed to be vulnerable to smaller ships. Not solowtfpwn mobiles.
On the other hand, why bother creating battleships if they can only kill other battleships?[1] It's a bit of the "Paris Hilton is famous because she's famous" paradox. What role do battleships provides nowadays? Glorified EHP sponges? Range projection due to large guns? Structure bashing? For fighting cap ships? [1] Battleships CAN kill smaller ships. A better question is whether you're simply better off flying a smaller ship to kill smaller ships (that require less isk and training time to get into, have less damage application problems, and can actually warp somewhere in a reasonable amount of time.)
The BIGGEST issue with battleships is their natural prey doesnt exist anymore. That prey being battlecruisers. BS are not intended to be fit with RHML with rigors, TP, and webs as their normal loadout. That was created by others (including myself) to counter the masses of cruisers in a hull that can take the abuse while also offering utility that cannot be matched.
What BS offer is more than an EHP sponge. They offer utility and range combined with higher EHP. You cannot get heavy neuts on any other ship (except maybe a bastardized curse). Heavy neuts are the bane of most cruisers.
Using my typhoon FI as an example. Combining 2 heavy neuts with 900-1200dps and 130k EHP plus an MJD that obliterates t3d and most cruisers/HACs all the while being very hard to hold down is a powerful tool. Id say the MJD and heavy neuts alone are what make BS very useful.
If you were to fix battlecruisers so they arent utter **** (see my sig), except in niche' scenarios, then BS will have an alternate role, other than frontline fleet ship.
So right now, we have a huge influx of cruisers.
Cruisers are countered by more cruisers. This is bad. Battlecruisers should counter cruisers, but they dont, at least not in the current meta. It should be something like this:
Frigate = Frigate destroyer > frigate cruiser > destroyer BC > cruiser <--- is broken causing many issues BS > BC
The ship food chain is broken. Fix it, and then BS will be in a better position. Some tweaking of BS may be needed. An overhaul on all BS or point defense silliness is not.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
2038
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 15:46:45 -
[108] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote: It should be something like this:
Frigate = Frigate destroyer > frigate cruiser > destroyer BC > cruiser <--- is broken causing many issues BS > BC Many frigs > BS. Lest we forget.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other spaces, where they can grow
Fozzie SOV is treating a symptom.
|
Dersen Lowery
Scanners Live in Vain
1713
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 15:50:22 -
[109] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:That was created by others (including myself) to counter the masses of cruisers in a hull that can take the abuse while also offering utility that cannot be matched.
Well, now, there's another idea: rebalance them toward the massive versatility of the Dominix and the Armageddon. Give them all multiple utility highs and/or overlapping turret and missile hardpoints and rebalance the damage output around fewer turrets. Essentially, they'd be like baby Marauders, without bastion mode.
Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
I voted in CSM X!
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
2038
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 15:52:00 -
[110] - Quote
Reinforcing the broken mechanics.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other spaces, where they can grow
Fozzie SOV is treating a symptom.
|
|
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
432
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 16:12:35 -
[111] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote: It should be something like this:
Frigate = Frigate destroyer > frigate cruiser > destroyer BC > cruiser <--- is broken causing many issues BS > BC Many frigs > BS. Lest we forget.
8 hi slot smartbombing BS > many frigs
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role
|
USS YORKTOWN
Quovis The Bastion
3
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 16:37:10 -
[112] - Quote
Damnit Falcon, get it togethor!
You may not be planning to, but you REALLY should. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2040
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 16:56:16 -
[113] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote: 8 hi slot smartbombing BS > many frigs *Any* frig? Specific example vs general design.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other spaces, where they can grow
Fozzie SOV is treating a symptom.
|
u3pog
Ministerstvo na otbranata
666
|
Posted - 2015.07.21 23:36:46 -
[114] - Quote
When comparing Battleships to HAC's and T3's do you consider their price costs? How about skill wise? Do the math again and see why one is superior to another. |
Heron Crome
Loud'n'Proud
0
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 00:03:50 -
[115] - Quote
Andreus Ixiris wrote: Nerfing T3 will not accomplish a revitalisation of battleships, it'll just make T3 cruisers a wasted skill investment. What would make battleships a reasonable choice in combat is some sort of scale-based damage modifier system for larger ships, such that smaller weapon systems simply don't do quite as much damage regardless of resistances.
100% this! thats exactly what i miss in nearly every f... spaceship game!
Thats the main problem of bc / bs and pls guys tell me how can a handgun destroy a tank? Ok thats a strange comparison but that would make a balance between small ships and the big ones! |
Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
2326
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 00:30:46 -
[116] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:That was created by others (including myself) to counter the masses of cruisers in a hull that can take the abuse while also offering utility that cannot be matched. Well, now, there's another idea: rebalance them toward the massive versatility of the Dominix and the Armageddon. Give them all multiple utility highs and/or overlapping turret and missile hardpoints and rebalance the damage output around fewer turrets. Essentially, they'd be like baby Marauders, without bastion mode. They primarily need mobility. Eve is a very mobile game. T1 battleships have not changed much since launch of 2003 other than to be made more gimped.
However the reality is nothing much will fix them because fixing them will break the rest of the game when everyone will just jump into BS if they perform well. What the game needs is a bottleneck for all ship types.
Perhaps a licence of manufacture sold by npcs. Let's say 100 are sold per week at base cost with a scaling cost for each addition licence. So Ishtars are flavour of the month, to create huge fleets of only Ishtars would artificially push the cost of Ishtars up to make them cost prohibitive.
The same would apply to battleships so fixing them so they're competitive would be possible without making them into the new EvE ship of necessity.
While artificial limits are seen as a bad thing they're everywhere in EvE, from limited sigs to limited asteroids. While it's possible for unlimited production of ships at base prices of minerals we'll always be seeing fleets of one dominant ship being fielded in EvE and the inability of the devs to create a game with a diversity of ships in fleet fights.
CCP Fozzie GǣWe can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-tonGǪ in null sec anomalies. Gǣ*
Kaalrus pwned..... :)
|
Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 05:06:30 -
[117] - Quote
Caiman Graystock wrote:Much sadness was had nüî
I was definitely hoping the increased drifter threat would lead to the development of new Tech II battleships based on the Abaddon/Rokh/Hyperion/Maelstrom and that this was the kick off for that. I guess not. One day maybe?
Such innovative creative thinking would be a first from CCP in a long while.
|
Daniela Doran
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
47
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 05:17:48 -
[118] - Quote
[quote=Stitch Kaneland]
What BS offer is more than an EHP sponge. They offer utility and range combined with higher EHP. You cannot get heavy neuts on any other ship (except maybe a bastardized curse). Heavy neuts are the bane of most cruisers.
Tee hehe, I'm actually playing around with heavy neut fitted Curses, but can't quite figure out how to make them useful for solo roams since they can't hold point at 80km.
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
2047
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 12:47:33 -
[119] - Quote
Daniela Doran wrote:... Tee hehe, I'm actually playing around with heavy neut fitted Curses, but can't quite figure out how to make them useful for solo roams since they can't hold point at 80km. ... Depends. Need some capacitor to go to warp.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
.
High Sec needs a stepping stone to other spaces, where they can grow
Fozzie SOV is treating a symptom.
|
Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
287
|
Posted - 2015.07.22 13:11:54 -
[120] - Quote
New amarr battleship ? what role is it for ? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |