| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jim McGregor
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 14:51:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Viktor Fyretracker Concord should go into Low Sec and 0.0 but not as the invinceable gank-o-matic form we have in secure space. but say a Concord expidition to analyze crime where the criminals hang out. however anyone with really low sec rating would still get agroed by this convoy. but the convoy could also be killed(hey maybe even have in deep 0.0 a chance to gain a BPC for concord ships).
So Concord would act like some kind of big brother for the bullied players who dont dare to go into low sec themselfs?  --- Eve Wiki | Eve Tribune | Eve Pirate |

Alski
Gallente Di-Tron Heavy Industries Freelancer Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:05:00 -
[32]
OP - you forgot to post with your alt  -
|

Nizar
Foundation R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:06:00 -
[33]
ROFL, good one bro. i really like your sence of humor. u saved my day with this drolly thread...
-------------- Nizar -------------- BARON VON NEINLEDERHOSEN
[green]Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 1 |

Jock Feegle
Amarr Games And Theory
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:06:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Since I am the be-all-end-all of everything that is EVE, I know exactly how all others must play the game to have fun. And since this is primarily a PvE game for me, everyone else must be subject to PvE at all times too unless he is docked. So everytime someone commits a criminal act in lowsec or 0.0, there must be a chance that concord will appear and wtfpwn him. There is no other way. If you don't like that, quit. Easy as that, you were not having fun anyway and we all will be better off without you too.
Discuss.
Leandro Salazar for Prez!
This post ftw! --- Jock Feegle CEO Games And Theory
"Me transmitte sursum, caledoni!" |

50freefly
Caldari Purify
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:10:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Moghydin Best idea ever!!! How didn't I think about it before? And plz, let NPC spawns drop T2 BPC's 
Let's not stop there! How about BPOs? Don't worry, they would only drop from NPC battleships!

Originally by: Eight Ace For reasons that have been lost in the mists of time all caldari ships are designed by two people. One does the left hand side and the other does the right.
And they never meet.
|

Plymer Ization
ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:10:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Plutoinum Edited by: Plutoinum on 06/12/2006 13:52:33
Originally by: Patch86 I think CONCORD should wander around 0.0 in roving gank squads.
However, these roving gank squads should be comprised of 1x cruiser and 2x frigates, like pirate spawns, so we can all kill them and get UBERRARE CONCORD H4XLOOT.
Fair trade 
Concord should appear, if someone logs, and blow him up. 
/signed 
|

Argenton Sayvers
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:16:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Argenton Sayvers on 06/12/2006 15:16:29 I disagree. And since i have more accounts then you, i win.
Eve IS a player versus player [interaction] game, everyone who seeks invulnerability and protection from player interaction is trying to destroy it.
|

Alowishus
Shadow Company Alektorophobia
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:40:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Since I am the be-all-end-all of everything that is EVE, I know exactly how all others must play the game to have fun. And since this is primarily a PvE game for me, everyone else must be subject to PvE at all times too unless he is docked. So everytime someone commits a criminal act in lowsec or 0.0, there must be a chance that concord will appear and wtfpwn him. There is no other way. If you don't like that, quit. Easy as that, you were not having fun anyway and we all will be better off without you too.
Discuss.
Your argument would be valid if CCP, makers of the game, owners of the servers, didn't say you were wrong and your intended style of play (PvP-free) isn't possible or desired. You don't even have to pay $14.95 to figure this out, just read a little. I could see your point if CCP intended the game to allow for people who never wanted PvP, or only wanted consensual PvP. But it doesn't. Never has and never will. FFS, stop playing baseball and whining that it's not football.
|

Lord BlackSter
The Syndicate Inc Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 15:50:00 -
[39]
Primary : Leandro Salazar Secondary : Leandro Salazar
|

Latex Mistress
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 19:05:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Latex Mistress on 06/12/2006 19:07:32 This thread rules!
Forget the OP's sarcasm, think about this:
Limited CONCORD presence in .4~.1, would be frigging awesome! Obviously, they're much stronger (ship to ship comparison) with low-sec npc rats, so they could have custom loot tables. I'm thinking... 1-time use only codes to deactive sentries in low-sec for 60 seconds or something equally interesting (CONCORD frig/cruiser BPC's anyone?). Sec status hits might have to be modified a bit as well. Just a roving gank group, no additional warp-ins (or rare ones) and you've got a winner.
OMG that would rule! I'd really like to see this in-game. LM
Latex Mistresss: bringing truth to the truculent one post at a time
|

Trollin
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 19:11:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Plutoinum Edited by: Plutoinum on 06/12/2006 13:54:46
Originally by: Arx Impera I wonder when will people realize his making fun of the retards that go "OMG THIS IS PVP GAME, IF YOU DONT LIKE IT LEAVE"...
You're right Einstein, we didn't notice it. It was too subtile. 
its actually spelled subtle.. there is no i.
you hold yourself up on such a high horse... I couldn't resist. --------------------------------------------------- A word to the wise ain't necessary, its the stupid ones that need the advice |

Loyal Servant
Caldari Cornhole Inc. The SUdden Death Squad
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 19:13:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Latex Mistress Edited by: Latex Mistress on 06/12/2006 19:07:32 This thread rules!
Forget the OP's sarcasm, think about this:
Limited CONCORD presence in .4~.1, would be frigging awesome! Obviously, they're much stronger (ship to ship comparison) with low-sec npc rats, so they could have custom loot tables. I'm thinking... 1-time use only codes to deactive sentries in low-sec for 60 seconds or something equally interesting (CONCORD frig/cruiser BPC's anyone?). Sec status hits might have to be modified a bit as well. Just a roving gank group, no additional warp-ins (or rare ones) and you've got a winner.
OMG that would rule! I'd really like to see this in-game.
This is basically what I was talking about, altho I like your idea better.
There are already 'kill concord' missions for pirate NPCs. In these missions, you do just that - kill concord.
They are not uber powerful, they are just like any other NPC.
I think there should be concord convoys thru low security space that we can gank for items.
Do not spawn them in belts, or near gates but make the hunter use the scanner/probes,etc to find these hidden treasures :)
However, take a sec hit for doing so. I think it would be cool, since they are not actively hunting us in 0.0 - more like we are hunting them :)
Cornhole, Inc. - Cornholeing eve one system at a time. Member, The Sudden Death Squad [TSDS]
|

Baron Logoffski
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 19:23:00 -
[43]
ROFLMAO .............No. |

Latex Mistress
Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 21:28:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Loyal Servant
Originally by: Latex Mistress Edited by: Latex Mistress on 06/12/2006 19:07:32 This thread rules!
Forget the OP's sarcasm, think about this:
Limited CONCORD presence in .4~.1, would be frigging awesome! Obviously, they're much stronger (ship to ship comparison) with low-sec npc rats, so they could have custom loot tables. I'm thinking... 1-time use only codes to deactive sentries in low-sec for 60 seconds or something equally interesting (CONCORD frig/cruiser BPC's anyone?). Sec status hits might have to be modified a bit as well. Just a roving gank group, no additional warp-ins (or rare ones) and you've got a winner.
OMG that would rule! I'd really like to see this in-game.
This is basically what I was talking about, altho I like your idea better.
There are already 'kill concord' missions for pirate NPCs. In these missions, you do just that - kill concord.
They are not uber powerful, they are just like any other NPC.
I think there should be concord convoys thru low security space that we can gank for items.
Do not spawn them in belts, or near gates but make the hunter use the scanner/probes,etc to find these hidden treasures :)
However, take a sec hit for doing so. I think it would be cool, since they are not actively hunting us in 0.0 - more like we are hunting them :)
Agreed. Not your typical "hang out at the doughnut stand" (gate) kind of CONCORD. I would like to see them much harder hitting and more defensive than current NPC's in missions though. If they're going to drop sentry-gun deactivation codes, etc... you've got to work for them.
And, if you show up with overwhelming odds (like 3:1 weight ratio) then they'll warp. Good use for dictor pilots and interceptors as well. Not just "20 BS's go hunt CONCORD" tonight...
Give me a part-time position on the content team... I'll work it right. 
LM
Latex Mistresss: bringing truth to the truculent one post at a time
|

schurem
Silver Snake Enterprise Interstellar Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 22:27:00 -
[45]
Edited by: schurem on 06/12/2006 22:29:11
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Since I am the be-all-end-all of everything that is EVE, I know exactly how all others must play the game to have fun. And since this is primarily a PvE game for me, everyone else must be subject to PvE at all times too unless he is docked. So everytime someone commits a criminal act in lowsec or 0.0, there must be a chance that concord will appear and wtfpwn him. There is no other way. If you don't like that, quit. Easy as that, you were not having fun anyway and we all will be better off without you too.
Discuss.
sarcasm is very hard to detect in plain text. What my man here means is that the PvP-centric posts take the attitude he is impersonating. its a clever joke fools, dont make yourself look any more stupid than you already do by taking this post literally. edit: didnt read 2nd page of thread However, I still think EvE needs more and better tactical warning sounds.
<<<< No Boundaries, No Fences, Fly Free Or Die Trying >>>>
|

Sswiftstrike
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 22:30:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Leandro Salazar Since I am the be-all-end-all of everything that is EVE, I know exactly how all others must play the game to have fun. And since this is primarily a PvE game for me, everyone else must be subject to PvE at all times too unless he is docked. So everytime someone commits a criminal act in lowsec or 0.0, there must be a chance that concord will appear and wtfpwn him. There is no other way. If you don't like that, quit. Easy as that, you were not having fun anyway and we all will be better off without you too.
Discuss.
It would be kinda cool if in .1-.4 there was a small chance that concord came to help, but definately not 0.0
|

Pacala
Gallente AirHawk Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.12.06 22:45:00 -
[47]
Since my opinion is in direct alignment with yours and we are WTFBBQOLD, I have the following to add.
The tracking speed of the 2nd Concord frigate from the left is .0034&*@##. As a result, while tanking Concord, sentry guns, and the Western ASCN fleet, I am severely hampered by my 37th drone's inability to pown that frig. This would of course be fixed by changing the 3,457th line of code in the overview object grid reference π.
Talk amongst yourselves.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |