EVE Search - Sticky:Jump Fatigue Feedback

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:Jump Fatigue Feedback

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Jenshae Chiroptera 2178	Posted - 2015.08.13 20:24:39 - [1] - Quote I love jump fatigue. It adds more strategy and stops alliances jumping on every little gang. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2180	Posted - 2015.08.14 00:08:37 - [2] - Quote Captain StringfellowHawk wrote: Jump Ranges to me should be adjusted Carriers shifted to 5.5 au Super Capitals to 7 au Titans to 8 au Jump Freighters 10 au Rorqual 7 au Blops can remain how it is Other way around. If you have these changes then Industrials go the furtherest, then carriers and dreads after that. Titans project the least distance. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2180	Posted - 2015.08.14 00:28:29 - [3] - Quote More capitals, especially Supers and Titans are dying. Phoebe is successful. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2185	Posted - 2015.08.14 13:04:09 - [4] - Quote Vic Jefferson wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: More capitals, especially Supers and Titans are dying. Phoebe is successful. A simplification to the point of dishonesty. When they are being lost in local conflicts, I would tend to agree with you. The fact that so many are dying to being ganked while moving illustrates how stagnant and boring capital hyper-localization makes the game... The problem with them dying is not moving in Phoebe. It is a lack of alliances growing big enough to push into the soft parts of space and fight them locally. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2187	Posted - 2015.08.14 16:59:01 - [5] - Quote afkalt wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Vic Jefferson wrote: Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: More capitals, especially Supers and Titans are dying. Phoebe is successful. A simplification to the point of dishonesty. When they are being lost in local conflicts, I would tend to agree with you. The fact that so many are dying to being ganked while moving illustrates how stagnant and boring capital hyper-localization makes the game... The problem with them dying is not moving in Phoebe. It is a lack of alliances growing big enough to push into the soft parts of space and fight them locally. And how do you get to those parts of space? You move. And die in the graveyard which is Aridia.. You are thinking current alliance moving around. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2193	Posted - 2015.08.15 15:14:26 - [6] - Quote Dograzor wrote: To keep it short: Both or at least either one need fixing (range + fatigue). My preference goes to range as the range puts a toll on a lot of individual players, having to do double the jumps is just so frustrating, especially when people need to run logistics or relocate capitals. Range is exactly why Phoebe is good. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2199	Posted - 2015.08.16 22:46:24 - [7] - Quote Equto wrote: ... No, what it means that that I can't even fight my enemies now because they can't get in my systems and I can't get in theirs. .... I find this interesting, coming from Darkness. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2201	Posted - 2015.08.17 11:52:08 - [8] - Quote Speedkermit Damo wrote: Bailian Moxtain wrote: 0,0 is more boring now than ever. Not for me it isn't. But then again I fight my neighbours. Yes, it is good having a sub-cap fight without a third party dog piling on with capitals. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.
Jenshae Chiroptera 2207	Posted - 2015.08.18 17:05:31 - [9] - Quote Hemmo Paskiainen wrote: ...There is a need for a battleship sized anti-capital bomber. I agree with your reasoning up to that point. That idea is dangerous. It is insane enough that Fozzie's team might get on board with it. CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids There are other ways to fix Null Sec stagnation and Fozzie SOV is the wrong approach.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.