| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 16:07:00 -
[1]
Originally by: R0ot id hate to be ascn and losing stations and battleships and dreads almost every week (maybe not stations every week) 
Not something Xelas ever needs to worry about as you actually need to have some stations and/or control some space in order to lose it. 
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 16:12:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Blacklight
Originally by: Fitz Chivalry
Originally by: R0ot id hate to be ascn and losing stations and battleships and dreads almost every week (maybe not stations every week) 
Not something Xelas ever needs to worry about as you actually need to have some stations and/or control some space in order to lose it. 
Still holding PNQY are you Fitz? Open wider, you might get both feet in.
What I meant weas that Xelas is a pet alliance which is ALLOWED to hold those stations by you guys, they control nothing.
Anything more to add?
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 16:40:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Fitz Chivalry on 09/12/2006 16:40:48 nvm, I hate these forums, they always bring out the inner tard. 
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 16:48:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Afonso Henriques
Originally by: Helen What a kefuffle over nothing.
As for Xelas guys it's probably best you keep quiet about what you can and can't do in Fountain. You are an amusement.
Funny, I was thinking the same thing abotu ASCN.
Your comments and opinions are valuable to us. We love to hear from you on how we can serve you better.
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 22:58:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Fitz Chivalry
What I meant weas that Xelas is a pet alliance which is ALLOWED to hold those stations by you guys, they control nothing.
Anything more to add?
Let me just get this clear in my head...
Xelas are our pets, and only exist in Fountain because we let them? So, that means BoB > Xelas, right? So, BoB +1, Xelas -1.
Now, ASCN could not hold a station (even with the help of Celes) from Xelas, who managed to retake and secure it without BoB's help? So, Xelas +1, ASCN -1.
Final result: BoB > Xelas > ASCN
Oh dear.
Wow that was a clever piece of forum magic that you pulled there, it had me all confused.
Having sat down with a wet towel on my head for four hours, it seems that according to your logic we are worse than Xelas?
So that means that BoB's great challenge, according to your logic, is to take on and attempt to defeat an alliance which, in its view, is a bit worse than Xelas.
GG
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.09 23:06:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Crucifier Who gives a **** about challenges and honor and that ****. They just want to kill you, get over it.
errm what? mine was a response to some smacktalk from Xelas, i didnt even bring BoB into this. And whoever mentioned honour?
Do you even read posts before you hit reply?
|

Fitz Chivalry
eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier
|
Posted - 2006.12.10 00:34:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Apollo Balthar
Originally by: Fitz Chivalry Edited by: Fitz Chivalry on 09/12/2006 16:40:48 nvm, I hate these forums, they always bring out the inner tard. 
Hmmmm, tell us more, you seem to know all about it ?
Thanks for proving my point so beautifully...
|
| |
|