| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ultim8Evil
Full Spectrum Inc
Fidelas Constans
257
   |
Posted - 2015.09.17 20:49:23 -
[1] - Quote
This is a serious question, not a troll post.
Rule 31 of the forum states:
"31. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.
CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties."
Does this mean that, for example, Identifying CCP Rise as Kil2 of Solo PvP YouTube fame (despite this being common knowledge) is technically against the rule?
Follow me on Twitter for literally no good reason @TheUltim8Evil
|
Dradis Aulmais
RW Vindicator Connection
Phoebe Freeport Republic
1024
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:01:09 -
[2] - Quote
Ultim8Evil wrote:This is a serious question, not a troll post.
Rule 31 of the forum states:
"31. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.
CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties."
Does this mean that, for example, Identifying CCP Rise as Kil2 of Solo PvP YouTube fame (despite this being common knowledge) is technically against the rule?
To get an answer it would have been better to open a support ticket. But you didn't so I reported this for breaking rule 31
Dradis Aulmais, Federal Attorney Number 54896
Free The Scope Three
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
9225
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:01:10 -
[3] - Quote
Ultim8Evil wrote:
Does this mean that, for example, Identifying CCP Rise as Kil2 of Solo PvP YouTube fame (despite this being common knowledge) is technically against the rule?
Good question. In General Discussion, of all places.
I'd be interested in a clarification on this as well.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
8547
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:01:12 -
[4] - Quote
I think a petition might be your best option Cap'n.
[b]----
CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off.[/b]
|
Paranoid Loyd
6888
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:02:38 -
[5] - Quote
Discussing the rules is against the rules.
"Gankers are just other players, not supernatural monsters who will get you if you don't follow some arbitrary superstition. Haul responsibly and without irrational fear." Masao Kurata
Fix the Prospect!
|
Marsha Mallow
2521
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:12:24 -
[6] - Quote
If devs tell people openly who they were ingame as players it's not an issue. Their choice. They might not have a choice depending on how recognisable they were as players, which is awkward.
If players cyberstalk developers to out their original ingame character, chances are they'll go the whole hog and dox them. And chances are there's an ugly agenda underlying it.
Ironic considering the worst dev/player public crucifixion by the mob was because Mintchip was allowed to recycle her ingame name. Maybe a lesson learned?
It's not an unreasonable policy to protect your staff from slavering nerdragers. That's sort of the point adopting a new title, it's supposed to demonstrate the break from their original allegiances and activities.
It's not unreasonable to protect players from other nerds using ingame identities. This is a role playing game.
Doxxing is being treated with increasing intolerance online, and rightly so.
Or do you want Real ID across the board?
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: TO THE PITCHFORKMOBILE!
Benny Ohu wrote: fire up the argument calibrators set phasers to outraged overheat keyboards reinforce the thread
Jenn aSide wrote: does anyone have any assless chaps I could borrow?
|
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
6322
|
Posted - 2015.09.17 21:45:28 -
[7] - Quote
File a petition.
Closed. 
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
Vice Admiral
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |