EVE Search - solo PVP - whats better, WOLF or JAGUAR?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

solo PVP - whats better, WOLF or JAGUAR?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Cpl Felix Caldari M. Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:12:00 - [1] anyone plz? cuase i really cant figure out wats better for solo PVP?
Nordvargr GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:14:00 - [2] Hound. Hope to see you in space!
Litus Arowar Amarr Obsidian Asylum Pure.	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:25:00 - [3] goonfleet strikes again! jaguar is supposed to be better as it has more slots, and can get an insane passive shieldtank going Albert Anastacia> Like they say, adapt or die. I adapted and now I get to Iwinbutton all over everyones face.
Shandling	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:26:00 - [4] Originally by: Litus Arowar jaguar is supposed to be better as it has more slots, and can get an insane passive shieldtank going Yep. Jaguar is great for solo PvP, as long as you pick your targets carefully.
Arian Snow Minmatar The Nest Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:26:00 - [5] Edited by: Arian Snow on 25/12/2006 00:26:13 Jaguar all the way mate: 3150II 1rocket/Nos 1Mwd, 1MedExtII,1Scrambler,1Web/Kin Res. 1PDU, 1Gyro, 1Inertia I dont remember I dont recall I dont have memory of anything at all!*
Shandling	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:29:00 - [6] Clicky for Jag setups
F Apparition Minmatar Life Extermination Axiom Empire	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:39:00 - [7] Edited by: F Apparition on 25/12/2006 00:39:51 Jaguar is usually the best (even better now that the old tracking bonus is now a double damage bonus like the wolf), but if you want a bit of variation, try out this wolf setup. Highs: 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] Launcher Slot Mediums: Fleeting Warp Scrambler I X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator Lows: Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Photonic CPU Enhancer I Photonic CPU Enhancer I 443 shield, 2.09/s, E/T/K/Ex=75/60/40/60 843 armor, E/T/K/Ex=92/67/25/10 316.25 cap, +4.59/s, -4.56/s 354.0 m/s 80.6 DPS Keep them within your 20km range, and if they get too close, web them and get out of the 10km range. Or here's another setup I used to use, and it's my tanking wolf. Works pretty nice. Highs: 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] E5 Prototype Energy Vampire Mediums: Micro Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I [1xCap Booster 200] Faint Warp Prohibitor I Lows: 400mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Small 'Accommodation' Vestment Reconstructer I N-Type Magnetic Membrane I N-Type Reactive Membrane I 443 shield, 2.09/s, E/T/K/Ex=75/60/40/60 1893(ish) armor, E/T/K/Ex=92/67/51/40 316.25 cap, +4.59/s, -11.397/s 354.0 m/s 74.0 DPS Nice passive armor tank, and when done right you can withstand a lot of damage, and use that cap booster in conjunction with your nos to keep your cap going, even if you do encounter larger nos/neuts. Hope that helps if you want something that isn't the cookie cutter jaguar.
Shandling	Posted - 2006.12.25 00:44:00 - [8] Edited by: Shandling on 25/12/2006 00:44:19 Originally by: F Apparition Edited by: F Apparition on 25/12/2006 00:39:51 Jaguar is usually the best (even better now that the old tracking bonus is now a double damage bonus like the wolf), but if you want a bit of variation, try out this wolf setup. Highs: 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] 280mm Howitzer Artillery II [11xPhased Plasma S] Launcher Slot Mediums: Fleeting Warp Scrambler I X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator Lows: Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Photonic CPU Enhancer I Photonic CPU Enhancer I 443 shield, 2.09/s, E/T/K/Ex=75/60/40/60 843 armor, E/T/K/Ex=92/67/25/10 316.25 cap, +4.59/s, -4.56/s 354.0 m/s 80.6 DPS Keep them within your 20km range, and if they get too close, web them and get out of the 10km range. Or here's another setup I used to use, and it's my tanking wolf. Works pretty nice. Highs: 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] 150mm Light AutoCannon II [80xBarrage S] E5 Prototype Energy Vampire Mediums: Micro Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I [1xCap Booster 200] Faint Warp Prohibitor I Lows: 400mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Small 'Accommodation' Vestment Reconstructer I N-Type Magnetic Membrane I N-Type Reactive Membrane I 443 shield, 2.09/s, E/T/K/Ex=75/60/40/60 1893(ish) armor, E/T/K/Ex=92/67/51/40 316.25 cap, +4.59/s, -11.397/s 354.0 m/s 74.0 DPS Nice passive armor tank, and when done right you can withstand a lot of damage, and use that cap booster in conjunction with your nos to keep your cap going, even if you do encounter larger nos/neuts. Hope that helps if you want something that isn't the cookie cutter jaguar. Wolves are nice, but midslots! :(
Altrex Stoppel Synergy. Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2006.12.25 01:09:00 - [9] Edited by: Altrex Stoppel on 25/12/2006 01:08:52 Jaguar.... 3x150 ACs t2, 1x named small nos MWD, scram, web, med extender t2 2x PDU, inertia stab -Fits easy -2300+ shields -practically insta warps -fairly fast Wolf...... 4x150 ACs t2, 1x named small nos MWD, scram SAR, 400mm RT plate, kin and expl passive hardners -A little harder on fitting skills -Only 2 mids no web -1600+ armor with fairly good resists -Doesn't handle as well as your normal frigate due to the plate That's my 2ISK Omg, Dark Shikari got pregnant with the forums!
Ren Tales Null Horizon	Posted - 2006.12.25 09:43:00 - [10] Jag might be a bit safer to solo in... but AC wolf is just so much fun! I personally prefer the higher DPS and only slightly worse tank (with two energized kin and exp and a t2 armor rep, it has BETTER overall resists and same regen/sec as passive jag, just less HP and thus worse burst dmg vulnerability and nos vulnerability). The los of a webber is negligible as a frig, to be honest. I've never missed it, and if I went back to a jag I would use the bonus mid for another sheild tanking mod.

Jim McGregor	Posted - 2006.12.25 10:33:00 - [11] Originally by: Ren Tales The los of a webber is negligible as a frig, to be honest. I've never missed it, and if I went back to a jag I would use the bonus mid for another sheild tanking mod. Depends... I dont think a Taranis with void is much fun at super close range... --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Arx Sheep Minmatar Infinitus Odium	Posted - 2006.12.25 10:35:00 - [12] Originally by: Ren Tales The los of a webber is negligible as a frig, to be honest. I've never missed it, and if I went back to a jag I would use the bonus mid for another sheild tanking mod. I disagree, soloing in an af means your targets are going to be intys and other afs, you need a webber to stop intys just mwding out of your scram range and it helps to keep range on anything with blasters.
Exogene	Posted - 2006.12.25 14:30:00 - [13] Originally by: Arx Sheep Originally by: Ren Tales The los of a webber is negligible as a frig, to be honest. I've never missed it, and if I went back to a jag I would use the bonus mid for another sheild tanking mod. I disagree, soloing in an af means your targets are going to be intys and other afs, you need a webber to stop intys just mwding out of your scram range and it helps to keep range on anything with blasters. Nos against blaster ships works like a charm


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.