EVE Search - iss/iac update

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

iss/iac update

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 17:09:00 - [1] I find it remarkable that BD has to respond to each and every ISS post. Is he an official represntative at all? Or is he really just an opinionated footsoldier providing the forum forces qith quoteable material? _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 17:16:00 - [2] Originally by: Press Officer Quote: I find it remarkable that BD has to respond to each and every ISS post. Is he an official represntative at all? Or is he really just an opinionated footsoldier providing the forum forces qith quoteable material? And you are ..... lmao "Maelstrom Alliance" enough said.... yes, nameless exploit alt, laugh away _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 18:52:00 - [3] Originally by: Butter Dog but I'm professional enough to keep my mouth shut about what I know. i can't imagine that's true _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 20:50:00 - [4] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Seleene Originally by: Butter Dog Of course there are quite a few things I could mention about MC, which won't do wonders for their reputation, but I'm professional enough to keep my mouth shut about what I know. There has been nothing even semi-professional about your conduct on these forums. If you were professional enough to keep your mouth shut, you would keep your mouth shut and let your leaders do the talking. As for what you'd like to mention about MC, I strongly suggest you stick to smacking IAC and leave us out of this. Quote: Recommend you do the same. Lets just say my personal opinion of MC isnt what it once was, and leave it at that. If there was something about our performance on this contract that did not meet your standards... we do not care. You didn't sign our paycheck. We came, we did the job we were paid to do, and then some. The man who signed our paycheck has no complaints. Now we are leaving. Let that be the end of it. You take these forums far too seriously. We had it in Suffolk, and now BD, you bring Foot and Mouth disease to the forums _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 23:09:00 - [5] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 29/12/2006 22:44:17 Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: Butter Dog because for me its an extention of the gameplay. Which is the exact reason you should either put a sock in it, or think a bit better on what your posts are doing for ISS reputation, your own rep ( doubt that could get any worse though ) and the best interest of me and everybody else that has money riding on you guys well making money... having it thrown away cause you can't stop running your mouth isn't at all in the best interest of the shareholders! lol Its a game, get over yourself. Anyway I have elected to remove my roles and will be leaving ISS within 24 hours, because I refuse to work with MC. They actually sent a mail trying to order me what to do and say, failing to realise that I'm not in their employment, nor answerable to them. Downright rude. Well MC you f***** me right off. I'll make a forum thread in 24 hours when my roles are dropped and I am out the Alliance. And trust me no amount of spin will cover up your failings this time. Somebody feels the need to pirate some more. On a side note, I tihnk people are more likely to believe Seleene and the McMonkeys over you Mr Butternuts _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 23:14:00 - [6] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Sergio Ling Somebody feels the need to pirate some more. On a side note, I tihnk people are more likely to believe Seleene and the McMonkeys over you Mr Butternuts They don't have to believe me, I'll quote my sources. like this? <Butter_Dog> I think I will join The Priory <Butter_Dog> But maGz will not submit to me Quoting is easily done, people still have to BELIEVE what you say (on a side note, hands up if you believe my quote) _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.29 23:24:00 - [7] Originally by: Butter Dog MC arent all you think they are, you know. are they actually the true JLA? _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 01:03:00 - [8] So basically Butterdog is saying that the MC suck ISS would fail without them and he's joining The Priory? and that's an official press release taken from one of these characters BD has, Mr Count T _
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:12:00 - [9] Originally by: Butter Dog lots of babble about Seleene and not fighting when outnumbered I've fought Seleene and Co, fought with them, and lunched with a few of em. Understand this. MC bring power and doom to a fight, through experience and organisation, not so much from numbers. Look to goon for that. And Tactics. Because you choose not to fight someone doesn't make the decision BAD. It just means that tactically, you wouldnt be happy to enter into a fight where you don't have a good advantage, and that's ok. _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:20:00 - [10] BD - STOP TALKING You're at a stage now where IAC, MC, and everyone either side or on the fence is laughing at you. Just go away for a bit* *4 years _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right

Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:21:00 - [11] Edited by: Sergio Ling on 30/12/2006 02:22:02 Originally by: Butter Dog Let me tell you this: I was moist at the crotch to fight AAA. I offered ISS ISK upfront so I could take a dread into the fight and really have it out with them. It would have been fantastic. Somehow i think that i'd trust Seleene's judgement over yours when deciding where to put a Dradnought _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:27:00 - [12] release it now butterdog. Or would you rather have your own thread for it? just put a big 'THIS IS ME NOT ISS' disclaimer there, like you have for the last 6 weeks _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:53:00 - [13] Originally by: Bacilius Meanwhile, as Butterbaby creates the most interesting thread I have read this year, IAC Capital forces have removed the remaining ISS POS in JBY-06 and erected a replacement. This was accomplished alone and without assistance or interference from any outside forces. Thank you to all IAC pilots involved in the OP who saw fit to make their presence known in-game rather than waste their effort in this thread. Perhaps if you spend more time defending that which you openly embarrass yourself in the name of, Butters, you may have half a chance in this conflict. To MC, it's a shame to see our honoured opponents leave the field for the moment. Best of luck in your next contract and I hope to see you in space soon. Needless to say, when we see you in space you always make the game worth playing. To ISS, please get some sleep. You are all about to realise one very important thing about IAC... we live here. Bac Diplomat IAC You Win ButlerDog _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 02:55:00 - [14] Originally by: Demitri Klashnikov Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: War Bear Huh ... all this build up and it turns out to be another "MC has fake contracts" thread. I kinda feel like I did after watching the third Matrix. The buildup was there, then it just sorta fizzled. 3\10 would not read again. I see you're being briefed on damage limitation, well done. Its not going to work this time though, there was no 'employer' for the first Prohibition. You know it, I know it, and now the rest of EVE knows it. They also know you're s***-scared of AAA, won't fight anything less than a cakewalk, and have a chronic lack of balls at the leadership level. Do they now..... The evidence is crystal clear, I have no idea how I could have missed it, thank you so much for opening my and all of Eve's eyes. The community salutes you. looks like I need a corp then, can I join your famous eve wide influential corp please? Yes you can _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 03:01:00 - [15] argh, alts, suffocating my bad jokes... _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 03:14:00 - [16] tbh if I had ten billion isk spare, I'd happily pay the MC to wind tyrrax up with it. OR maybe pay COW to do it. i kid i kid i love you tyrrax! in the face (some more) _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 03:26:00 - [17] Originally by: Goodtime Girl Did the Butler pay MC _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 03:32:00 - [18] Originally by: Butter Dog Haha, you lose the thread Seleene. Its been fun. Now I'm off to bed. Try not to tell me what to do in the future. PS - don't have nightmares about AAA while I'm gone no see, the part where he pwnd your 'OMGREVELATION' was where HE won the thread (or She, as some of you romantically still hold on to) _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 03:43:00 - [19] Originally by: 0Virtu0 Originally by: Butter Dog Haha, you lose the thread Seleene. Its been fun. Now I'm off to bed. Try not to tell me what to do in the future. PS - don't have nightmares about AAA while I'm gone If you won the thread, the south won the Civil War. oh so now ASCN v The Darkness is called 'The Civil War'? Quite uncivil, i'd say _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 15:26:00 - [20] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Count TaSessine I haven't shared sensitive information with Butter Dog since about 6 months ago when we first kicked him out of ISS. If he has tried to represent my views in his various dealings with people in Eve, he has done so maliciously. He has now been kicked out again, and this time he won't be coming back. Despite a clear agreement not to post on Eve-O, he was unable to control himself. To be honest, I don't know what drives BD to do things this way. Count, I expected better of you. You need to get your facts straight. 1) You told me in a private conversation on Ventrilo that Seleene fought IAC in the first contract because they disliked Tyrrax, and that there was no contract. Are you going to lie and say this conversation never took place? I'd like a categorical statement on this issue, because frankly my view of you as a person depends on it. Whats it going to be... a lie, or an admission? 2) I was never kicked from ISS, you know it, I know it. 6 month ago I left because I refused to show you the log-in screen of one of my alts. You THEN ASKED me to return 1 month later to lead ISSN because there were no other suitable candidates. Having disposed of a character on the alt account I felt you would not have approved of, I agreed. 3) If you read this thread back, and CHECK YOUR OWN FORUM, you will see a post stating that I removed my roles and am leaving because I refuse to work with MC. So saying I'm being kicked is rather pointless when I already removed my roles to prepare for leaving 12 hours before you made this post. No, no, MC and now ISS, have pwnd you. Your revelation was poor, unoriginal, and had no backup. You contradict yourself. Your previous employers hate you. I tihnk you're funny, like a clown corpse. Just...go away. (I don't actually want you to go away, I want you to keep posting silliness on here cos it makes me chuckle, and my dog just dieded, so I needs the chucklez) _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right

Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 15:33:00 - [21] Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Butter Dog This thread delivers Keep squirming, MC. Makes you look really 'professional'. My favourite bit was the failed smear attempt against me, I chuckled myself to sleep. Originally by: butter dog (ad lib): I'm professional enough to keep my mouth shut yarly. look at you, with your 'ad lib'. You're such a professional forum poster, do you come here often? _ My alliance doesn't know this yet, but whatever I say completely represents them, cos i'm always right
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 15:42:00 - [22] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Sergio Ling No, no, MC and now ISS, have pwnd you. Your revelation was poor, unoriginal, and had no backup. You contradict yourself. Your previous employers hate you. I tihnk you're funny, like a clown corpse. Just...go away. (I don't actually want you to go away, I want you to keep posting silliness on here cos it makes me chuckle, and my dog just dieded, so I needs the chucklez) You've been adding nothing to this thread, apart from random 'ooh they pwned you' lines, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Facts: * MC refused to fight AAA for any price * Despite contibuting only about 25% of the capitals and about 10% of the support, they publically claim they were lynchpins of the F4 operation for the furtherment of their own image and ego * MC lied about the contract, stating it was only for F4, when in reality they failed the overall contract to take all three stations * MC were not contracted by anyone in the first Prohibition, I have stated my source above * They had participation issues, and their totally flawed POS handover in which Seleene STILL decided to dismantle without adequate force protection gave IAC a foothold back in the system * They attempted to control what I did post-contract, in a downright rude manner, depsite me being nothing to do with them (which was the catalyst for me posting what I have) So remind me, exactly where have MC been 'pwning' anyone in this thread? Because to me it looks like they have been thrown to the wolves. FACT - You said Count told you posting was fine. HE has called BS on that FACT - You said MC were scared of AAA and havent yet backed that up FACT - You said you were leaving ISS and yet it comes to light that maybe you were kicked FACT - You said you knew when to keep your mouth shut due to professionalism, and you obviously can't. And so on and so forth _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 17:26:00 - [23] the problem at this stage is that allegations have been made, and proof has been offered. But in the age of html, photoshop and internets, what proof can be offered that cant be called into question? _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 17:33:00 - [24] i'm not competing _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.30 18:04:00 - [25] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Fubear People seem to be forgetting that its Mercenary Coalition not Suicide Squad. Their goal is to make money, and how much money would they make if they lost their entire capital fleet to an AAA ambush? Fulfilling contracts while minimising their losses is what they have to do to survive. I cannot blame them for bowing out when a superior opponent appears, fighting a losing war is never good for the profit margin. You obviously havent read the thread. At 16 pages, I don't blame you. It goes far deeper than ISK loss, they would not fight AAA for any sum of money. They routinely reject 'tough' contracts and consistently go for the easy fights, running when things get too hairy. You want proof? Take a look at every contract they have had this year, and tell me one where either they didnt give up and run when things got tougher than expecter, or where it was an absoulute cakewalk. I dunno...they fought Maelstrom, and we're tough as old boots. _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.31 14:49:00 - [26] Originally by: Seleene I have a question about our first contract on IAC - Butter said he got that information from Count. Ummm... why would Count T know who the client was? I didn't tell him. The number of people who know this information, including the client, can be counted on one hand. Count and I did speak more than once about the possible fate of the IAC stations at the time, due to their close proximity, but that's it. This sounds true enough. I know at the time there was talk of buying an IAC outpost from the MC (we were red at the time), so ISS would naturally have been contacted over it as well _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.31 17:09:00 - [27] yeah, has this forum been trimmed? _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg
Sergio Ling Standard Operations Building Services Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.31 17:28:00 - [28] Originally by: Tirg Originally by: HeadWar Woah. Someone's been a bit heavyhanded with the moderation I think. Last I looked, there was 30 pages here, and one rather amusing post with statistics of posts per hour and views per hour. Where did they go? ONE- Thou shalt not discuss moderation. TWO- Stats are offtopic, and have nothing to do with the OP. THREE- spamming a thread with woohoo I'm on page 30 Ma! are also offtopic- and are being deleted. If you have any questions, email us at [email protected]. Further posts of the above type, along with flaming, trolling etc will be warned. you're just helping us reach 30 again :) _ Welcome to Rancho Zoidberg

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.