| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.11.30 23:55:00 -
[1]
Quote: all npc production of bs should be stopped, user made only making them either alot harder to find or much more expensive seeing as it will be player controlled prices, if a few got together and set a min price for thereships, they could rake it in and make bs's more valuble
problem is there is already to many BS BP's on thne market there would still be a lot of peoble building them Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.01 22:42:00 -
[2]
Quote: Of course bookmarks, instajumps/docks, dual MWDs need to be fixed, but TOGETHER with this build speed thingy.
6 hours for a battleship is simply not enough.
i agree there has been so many posts on these topics it would be nice to see some CCP response Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 18:53:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Paw Sandberg on 02/12/2003 18:54:02 i think we are several on here that DO think build times is part of the problem
again a part not the whole problem Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 19:49:00 -
[4]
Quote: So what's the problem with so many people in battleships? What's the difference between 1000 people flying a BS vs 1000 flying a frigate? I think perhaps some players (who are obviously already flying BS's) want to remain king of the hill by preventing others from flying a like class vessel. If you want to thin out the herd, I'd suggest dropping the insurance coverage to only cover frigate and industrial class ships. Cruisers and BS's could be considered machines of war and therefore undesirable for coverage by insurance companies.
Limiting the progression of a player I don't think is the real issue in this game, I feel the lack of loss for a character in this game is what is missing. You've got clones, so no loss of training; insurance prevents the total loss of your ship, though your items are usually lost. Items in storage are protected as they are untouchable by anyone.
Maybe some real loss in the game? Podkill someone, and get to pick one of any item that person owns? Basically, why second guess if you want to mix it up in battle if 5 minutes after you've been blasted you are back up and running as if nothing happened?
problem is
no one other than a BS can kill a BS and they are the jack of all trades they can do anything better then a Cruiser or Frigate read the forums this is what many other ppl then me say
also just for the record i am NOT flying a BS but a cruiser
on the insurance you are right real life insurance would not cover a War ship but would the miner or the trader also real life insurance would go up if you did lose a ship and down if you did not
the insurance change alone would reduce the number of BS in the game bacause of the increased fear of losing them Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 20:26:00 -
[5]
Quote: You are incorrect sir, one of my corp mates took out a pirate camping BS with but a cruiser. BS's are big ships, but lack of skills and experience will not prevent the loss of such a massive ship.
well i am glad to have been wrong i should however proberly have ssaid near imposible and it does not change the fact that the BS is a do all Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.02 20:40:00 -
[6]
that would mean fewer peoble flying them and gate campers would not be able to use them Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.04 03:34:00 -
[7]
Quote:
Quote: Errrm ruffles, never heard of having stuff in stock? If you specialise in building things then you can have a stock of them available to sell. If you go buy a car you don't expect that the car still needs to be built in the factory, you expect to buy one that is in stock, just like anything else.
You never sold something you haven't built yet? Interesting... Yes we keep stock, but we also are fans of JIT. Its a nice thing to not tie up all your assets ;) Very flexible cashflow.
You honestly say that for 1-10 minutes of great fighting, you may well be happy to wait 6 days to play again? I feel somewhat lacking in contentment :) Personally, I would want to be out there again as soon as possible.
I do tend to agree more with our friend Lucas. He has a very much more valid point. Almost no one will insure something like a warship, whilst industrials and frigates, perhaps some cruisers used for hauling duties, but why insure a battleship? Deliberatley pay out heaps of cash for something that big being destroyed when it was built to go and destroy other things.
That may very well be more of an active solution then many have previously thought. If you couldn't insure them, you may be tempted to use them more tactically and not all the time...
Very nice thought :D
thats the point though there would be more compotition in the market as well
again take away the insurance on BS but ALSO increase build times and i am saying all build times i can see you moving ammo of your lines in seconds (maybe 1 (small) ammo a second) this would all help increase the prices in the market in my huble opinion (and proberly make the mineral prices drop )
Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.04 08:36:00 -
[8]
mining hardpoints Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.07 17:25:00 -
[9]
and honestly what would stop BS from using mining drones (i dont have a problem with that)
that way a BS or war cruiser would still be able to mine in 0.0 it would just have to use its drones
Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|

Paw Sandberg
|
Posted - 2003.12.08 16:22:00 -
[10]
Quote: Edited by: Chade Malloy on 08/12/2003 09:42:16
Quote:
Sitting in empire space should be low risk and low reward.
Hm, you canŠt say that in general...what about trading? out in 0.0 there are just not enough stations with trade goods, so traders (have to) stay in empire... Maybe more traders in slow indies would tramp out to 0.0 if there would be more promising trades to do, rare goods, black market etc... and this of course would lead to increased pirate presence, and THIS on the other hand causes more need of escort ships, which will end in more battles and satisfy more people !
About the insurance for BS, i totally agree, take it OFF, its simply insane and unrealistic, same as if you could insure a warhead from exploding. 
just my 0.02 ISK
i like this idear as well
make taxes in secure space (come on Concord and the navys are protecting you ) have a 90 % tax in 1.0 then drop it down to 0.1 and have a low tax in 0.0 (station and turret maintance) this alone would make trading in 0.0 more profitble and yes NOOB would get screwed cause they would have to pay taxes on their buys and sells (this could (maybe) be fixed by letting a noob have a 14 day period of notax) these taxes should be on everything buying, selling ,repearing ,mining and procesing
Thank You Paw Sandberg
for all your BPC needs see http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=55706&page=1
|
| |
|