| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Mtthias Clemi
Gallente Infinitus Odium Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.01.22 00:47:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Marcus TheMartin
Originally by: Mtthias Clemi
Originally by: Patch86 Besides, at least in the future there's no possibility of accidentally killing your own grandfather 
OH LOOK! A lesson in causality from MR "I'm my own grandpa"!
i love that show erm
Future becuase then i could get some cool gadgets and bring them back to pew pew everyone with.
Would you rather, Be blind but able to feel (physically), or have vision and no feeling?
Why does every one have to f with time don't you know bringing stuff back with you changes the time stream (of course this would have to be a 6 dimensional time machince the 4 dimensional model would just let you watch and the 5 dimensional one would just dump you in a parallel universe)
I'd go back to the past and solve mysteries then get assisnated by the Catholic church and the CIA and CCP
I know perfectly well that it messes with the time stream.. im messing with it on purpose... becuase i want to!
ok ok that was harsh, i dont hate mods.. as an apology the mod who shows the most wuv gets a free mercedes...
|

Reficul Lived
Amarr Red Blade Industries United Corporations of Eve
|
Posted - 2007.01.22 00:59:00 -
[32]
MMmm... Transversal Space Time Continueum Disruption... it tastes like kittens
|

Angelis666
Amarr The Knights Of Camelot FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 19:59:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Angelis666 on 23/01/2007 20:00:32
Originally by: Patch86 Would you rather have every web-browser you ever use from now on permanently rigged so that it can only view the WoW forums and nothing else, or lose both your hands.
Go 
I'd rather shave my eyes and stab my sack with a fork.
Originally by: Reficul Lived MMmm... Transversal Space Time Continueum Disruption... it tastes like kittens
If you built a time machine and then brought something back from the future it wouldn't stuff up the time line because you built the time machine in the present so you we're meant to bring something back from the future in the first place. But i could be wrong and if i am see you in in the dimension
|

Yendri
Perkone
|
Posted - 2007.01.23 21:37:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Marcus TheMartin
I'd go back to the past and solve mysteries then get assisnated by the Catholic church and the CIA and CCP
Damnit! TomB shot JFK? with Oveur hidden on the grassy knoll?
now... now I understand it all.
*reaches carefully for the tinfoil hat*
|

Samuel Freedom
|
Posted - 2007.01.24 20:27:00 -
[35]
1) Sack 
2) Future 
|

Tyto
Minmatar Trinity Nova
|
Posted - 2007.01.24 22:05:00 -
[36]
Would you rather give or receive?
Click here to visit our site |

Benco97
Gallente Multiverse Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 00:06:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Tyto Would you rather give or receive?
oh oh oh! I know this one! I prefer to Receive ^^
"MY GOD KEEP THIS AWAY FROM BENCO97!!!!!" - Constantine Arcanum |

Zezman
Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 00:15:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Tyto Would you rather give or receive?
Give
And I'll tell you why.
You are thinking I'll say because there's greater happiness in giving than there is in receiving, and this is true, but it's not what I'm thinking of right now....
If you can give, that means you already have, if you already have, you don't need. If you receive, its because you need, because you don't already have. Therefore, I would rather give, because then it would mean I already have, and therefore am not needy. Get it?
|

Volatar
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 00:28:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Zezman Get it?
surprisingly yes
1)sack 2)past
---
|
|

Zapatero

|
Posted - 2007.01.25 16:29:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Zezman
Originally by: Tyto Would you rather give or receive?
Give
And I'll tell you why.
You are thinking I'll say because there's greater happiness in giving than there is in receiving, and this is true, but it's not what I'm thinking of right now....
If you can give, that means you already have, if you already have, you don't need. If you receive, its because you need, because you don't already have. Therefore, I would rather give, because then it would mean I already have, and therefore am not needy. Get it?
Careful, it could have been a glory hole question 
EON magazine - MMM Publishing - EON Awards |
|

Zezman
Murder of Crows E N I G M A
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 18:19:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Zapatero
Originally by: Zezman
Originally by: Tyto Would you rather give or receive?
Give
And I'll tell you why.
You are thinking I'll say because there's greater happiness in giving than there is in receiving, and this is true, but it's not what I'm thinking of right now....
If you can give, that means you already have, if you already have, you don't need. If you receive, its because you need, because you don't already have. Therefore, I would rather give, because then it would mean I already have, and therefore am not needy. Get it?
Careful, it could have been a glory hole question 
Soooo... that's where the dev's minds are.... 
|

Xenocidal Rage
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 22:43:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Denrace So...
Would you rather shave your eyes or stab your sack with a fork?
Stab my sack with a fork. That way I wouldn't have to worry about getting 'em pregnant! 
|

Xenocidal Rage
|
Posted - 2007.01.25 22:44:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Zapatero
Originally by: Zezman
Originally by: Tyto Would you rather give or receive?
stuff
Careful, it could have been a glory hole question 
QFT
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |