| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Marraach
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2016.01.30 17:09:06 -
[1] - Quote
Hi all,
Am back to Eve after years and almost need to learn back everything.
I am checking my Deimos fit and managing powergrid.
Looking at cap booster, why would anyone use Medium Cap booster II over Medium electrochemical cap booster 1? Tech II cost way more than the other and requires more powergrid. Every other stats are the same.
Is there any drawback I am missing for using medium electrochemical cap booster instead of the tech II version? Thanks |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
10495
|
Posted - 2016.01.30 17:34:42 -
[2] - Quote
Because it's well cool
Got a HoleySheet1 corpse? I'll buy it for 200m!
Bumble's Space Log
|

Aoi Litvyak
Random inactiva corporation
0
|
Posted - 2016.01.30 17:56:30 -
[3] - Quote
You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32. |

Marraach
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2016.01.30 18:12:13 -
[4] - Quote
Aoi Litvyak wrote:You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32.
Hi thanks for pointing this. However there seems to be no difference if using 800 cap boosters.
Looks fine to me, will not use the tech II version. Thanks
|

Tiddle Jr
Brutor tribe Minmatar Republic
767
|
Posted - 2016.01.31 00:34:06 -
[5] - Quote
Marraach wrote:Aoi Litvyak wrote:You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32. Hi thanks for pointing this. However there seems to be no difference if using 800 cap boosters. Looks fine to me, will not use the tech II version. Thanks
Why not faction one over meta 4? |

Marraach
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2016.01.31 02:13:28 -
[6] - Quote
Tiddle Jr wrote:Marraach wrote:Aoi Litvyak wrote:You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32. Hi thanks for pointing this. However there seems to be no difference if using 800 cap boosters. Looks fine to me, will not use the tech II version. Thanks Why not faction one over meta 4?
Well, because I prefer to pay 260k instead of 30-40M |

Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
737
|
Posted - 2016.01.31 02:20:02 -
[7] - Quote
Marraach wrote:Tiddle Jr wrote:Marraach wrote:Aoi Litvyak wrote:You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32. Hi thanks for pointing this. However there seems to be no difference if using 800 cap boosters. Looks fine to me, will not use the tech II version. Thanks Why not faction one over meta 4? Well, because I prefer to pay 260k instead of 30-40M
T2 heavy CB will fit an extra navy 800 booster, but that only applies to BS. A medium cap booster will only fit 1 800, no matter if its t1 or t2. Navy versions also use less room, so you can carry more in your cargo.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role - OP SUCCESS
|

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage RAZOR Alliance
729
|
Posted - 2016.01.31 03:03:19 -
[8] - Quote
Heated cycle time is important too. If you're using 800s you should basically always be preheating your injector to shave some seconds off the over all cycle.
Veteran and solo/small gang PVP advocate.
|

Marraach
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2016.01.31 03:13:56 -
[9] - Quote
Good info, Thanks all |

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
1198
|
Posted - 2016.02.01 01:33:01 -
[10] - Quote
Marraach wrote:Aoi Litvyak wrote:You can put three 400 navy cap chargers in one rather than only two with the lower tiers. Or more smaller ones whatever.
40m3 capacity rather than 32. Hi thanks for pointing this. However there seems to be no difference if using 800 cap boosters. Looks fine to me, will not use the tech II version. Thanks
I just want to add, You don't want to use 800's in a medium booster. Because you get an 800 boost, then reload time, then 800 then reload.
It's better to use 3 Navy 400's, so 1200 boost, then reload time, rinse and repeat.
If you live to see even one reload, you're talking about 50% more cap boosted, with less time spent on reloads. It adds up over a few cycles to a pretty substantial advantage.
|

ChromeStriker
Out of Focus Odin's Call
1000
|
Posted - 2016.02.01 08:25:34 -
[11] - Quote
RavenPaine wrote:doing some maths After all these years....I always thought that 3 Navy 400's would be a better fit than a single 800. With reload times and cycles the same, it turns out that 800's are just better. Mind blown 
"better" is subjective... it depends what your using the cap for and the situation....
Sometimes you dont need the full hit of the 800, and spreading the cap over time is "better" (3x 400's)
No Worries
|

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
1198
|
Posted - 2016.02.01 17:08:35 -
[12] - Quote
ChromeStriker wrote:RavenPaine wrote:doing some maths After all these years....I always thought that 3 Navy 400's would be a better fit than a single 800. With reload times and cycles the same, it turns out that 800's are just better. Mind blown  "better" is subjective... it depends what your using the cap for and the situation.... Sometimes you dont need the full hit of the 800, and spreading the cap over time is "better" (3x 400's)
Yes, true. I have a PvE Proteus that I would still run 400's in, because of limited cargo space, and the fact I can carry 3 charges already loaded. I suspect that might apply to a lot of cruiser sized cargo bays.
Up until now, I had assumed that 400's would also give me more cap, because of less reload time. But the chart I figured out yesterday shows that 800's have a better return after just 1 reload.
Side note, edit: I seem to remember that rats used to drop cap booster charges, and I would get reloads from that out in null regularly. Not any more though. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |