| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saul Dhampir
Caldari
Eye of God
X-PACT
   |
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:18:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Saul Dhampir on 31/01/2007 23:14:38
You can't do polls here so i'll just have to keep updating this post manualy. Poll is to see who likes the idea of changing one of each Command Ship group to use the Tier II Bruiser models. EG Nighthawk becomes a Black Drake, Vulture stays as it is. Vote with an 'A' or 'B'
A: Yeah! do it do it do it!
B: Your nuts Saul, shut up.
Saul
|
Ademaro Imre
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:25:00 -
[2]
A
Sig removed, maximum allowed image size is 24,000 bytes. Please contact [email protected] for more info (including a copy of your picture!) -wystler |
xxTERRORISTxx
Eye of God
X-PACT
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:31:00 -
[3]
Edited by: xxTERRORISTxx on 31/01/2007 23:27:35
A is for apple
(vote A)
|
Akita T
Caldari
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:40:00 -
[4]
Ok, MAYBE if you make the NH have 7 or even 8 launchers, 6 mids, 5 lows and 40% more HP as now, I'd say yeah, make it a black Drake. Hmm, wait, that would be a whole new ship ! So...
B.
Because I also want two T2 ships BASED on the Drake to be released in the future !
NH is Ferox, leave it be.
_
MySkills | Module/Rig stacknerfing explained |
Spoon Thumb
Khanid Aerospace Group
Khanid Provincial Authority
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:41:00 -
[5]
B, unless it is faction ship
A Drake Command Ship would mean you might as well take ferox out of the game
-----
Khaldari
Crystaline Green
A Khanid Aerospace Company
|
Reggie Stoneloader
eXceed Inc.
INVICTUS.
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:51:00 -
[6]
B. It would change the production tree to require a Drake, so the guys who build them would need a whole new researched BPO. I don't like the T2 lottery, but suddenly changing the main ingredient in something that's already tough to build is mean.
|
Nariana Verex
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.01.31 23:58:00 -
[7]
B.
The poor Ferox hull has a bad enough time of it as it is. Poor thing's T1 version needs a sixth turret hardpoint now that all the previous Missileox users have a Drake. =/
----------
Flying Amarr and only Amarr. Not a ***** since 2006. |
Saul Dhampir
Caldari
Eye of God
X-PACT
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 00:00:00 -
[8]
Ok we are NOT talking about stats and its load out here. We are talking pure asthetics, changing the model that is all.
Saul
|
Tarron Sarek
Gallente
Solid Industries Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 01:47:00 -
[9]
Hmm..
C. Vulture uses Drake model
How about that? Seems to be less popular than the Nighthawk. Thus, balance decision 
___________________________________
_/_/ Game balance isn't just a luxury \_\_ |
Reggie Stoneloader
eXceed Inc.
INVICTUS.
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 03:19:00 -
[10]
 Originally by: Saul Dhampir
Ok we are NOT talking about stats and its load out here. We are talking pure asthetics, changing the model that is all.
Saul
So what, you put a Ferox, some morphite, some components and some love into a manufacturing array and a T2 Drake pops out? That's retarded.
|
|
|
William Hamilton
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 06:13:00 -
[11]
B
|
minerdave
Gallente
Ma-Ven Industries
Phobos Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 11:20:00 -
[12]
B because if you stop and think about it the ferox has a completly different set up than a drake. secondly a nighthawk can use guns. drakes wernt designed to use guns *thinks back to the nasty incident on the test with the over sized rail guns*
better off with t2 drakes tbh (hmmm Heavy Assault BC???)
|
Tarron Sarek
Gallente
Solid Industries Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 14:37:00 -
[13]
I'd say the game doesn't need a heavy assault version of every existing ship class.
Why? Boring.
___________________________________
_/_/ Game balance isn't just a luxury \_\_ |
Marcus TheMartin
Gallente
Tuxedo.
|
Posted - 2007.02.01 21:53:00 -
[14]
Drake is ugly leave the nighthawk as it is
Half Assed Rhymage
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |