EVE Search - Shield Kronos

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Missions & Complexes

Shield Kronos

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5008	Posted - 2016.03.01 04:34:06 - [1] - Quote Since all Marauders are effectively over-tanked, I've had quite a bit of success with a shield fit Kronos. Optimal and falloff with three tracking enhancers is almost on par with two range-scripted tracking computers, with the added bonus of a 25% tracking bonus. I run this fit with a set of Genolution, Ogdin's Eye Coordination, Zor's Hyper-link and the RF-905 and LH-1005 gunnery implants. With a mid-grade Ascendancy Epsilon and WS-618 implant it gets up to 4.17 AU/s. [Kronos, Kronos Shield] Tracking Enhancer II Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Tracking Enhancer II Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Tracking Enhancer II Gist X-Type 500MN Microwarpdrive Dread Guristas Adaptive Invulnerability Field Gist X-Type Large Shield Booster Cap Recharger II 350mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge L 350mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge L 350mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge L 350mm Railgun II, Federation Navy Antimatter Charge L Bastion Module I Small Tractor Beam II Small Tractor Beam II Salvager I Large Hyperspatial Velocity Optimizer II Large Hyperspatial Velocity Optimizer II 'Augmented' Hornet x5 'Augmented' Vespa x5 I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 224	Posted - 2016.03.01 14:11:21 - [2] - Quote Wny not drop one of the pimped mag stabs for a tech 2 then pimp 2 of the trackers? I'd be curious comparing performance using faction TEs as I never see them used. Also how would this compare with using blasters with null? similar ranges surely? except the blasters track better Will gank for food
GinBar BALKAN EXPRESS Shadow Cartel 6	Posted - 2016.03.01 15:41:36 - [3] - Quote Tarojan wrote: Wny not drop one of the pimped mag stabs for a tech 2 then pimp 2 of the trackers? I'd be curious comparing performance using faction TEs as I never see them used. Also how would this compare with using blasters with null? similar ranges surely? except the blasters track better faction TE just easy for fitting nothing less ( well if 0.5% on falloff means anything to you),
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 224	Posted - 2016.03.01 16:13:01 - [4] - Quote Oh right. thanks for explaining that. Will gank for food
Sobaan Tali Caldari Quick Reaction Force 834	Posted - 2016.03.02 05:25:38 - [5] - Quote Faction TE's are also much more expensive of an upgrade than a faction damage mod from what I recall, so it's not an equal trade to upgrading/downgrading. Upgrading a TC makes better sense anyways in most cases for mission boats. "Tomahawks?" "----in' A, right?" "Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each." "----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
The Bigpuns Touring New Eden Haven. 112	Posted - 2016.03.02 18:24:36 - [6] - Quote Ah yes, 400 mil ISK for a 2 slot shield tank, when a 2 slot t2 armor tank does the job fine. And by your own admission, 3 tc's do better than 3 te's. Just use the armor tank and get better stats. I've heard your argument for 350's over 425's before, it's not to my taste (especially when you have 3 tc's to script for tracking), but I'm not going to mark you down for it. But seriously, stop tying to jam square pegs in round holes just for the sake of it. Your kooky fits are just plain old worse then the norm.
Sobaan Tali Caldari Quick Reaction Force 838	Posted - 2016.03.04 00:26:46 - [7] - Quote The Bigpuns wrote: But seriously, stop tying to jam square pegs in round holes just for the sake of it. Your kooky fits are just plain old worse then the norm. At least he's trying something. Honestly, this community could use more people willing to try something off the wall, even at the risk that it's less efficient or more costly than what literally everyone else and their mother uses, not fewer. If he wants to keep tossing ideas out there, good or bad, let him. At worst, it may spark an interest in someone to experiment rather than settle. "Tomahawks?" "----in' A, right?" "Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each." "----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."
aldhura Bartledannians Nite Owls 35	Posted - 2016.03.04 01:18:46 - [8] - Quote Sobaan Tali wrote: The Bigpuns wrote: But seriously, stop tying to jam square pegs in round holes just for the sake of it. Your kooky fits are just plain old worse then the norm. At least he's trying something. Honestly, this community could use more people willing to try something off the wall, even at the risk that it's less efficient or more costly than what literally everyone else and their mother uses, not fewer. If he wants to keep tossing ideas out there, good or bad, let him. At worst, it may spark an interest in someone to experiment rather than settle. Soo why don't you then walk to work on your hands, let the sheep use the cars, if you trying to make the game more complex so be it. There happens to be a reason "everyone else and their mother uses" Bartledannians Corporation is recruiting Nite Owls Alliance is recruiting
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 227	Posted - 2016.03.04 02:42:54 - [9] - Quote Sobaan Tali wrote: The Bigpuns wrote: But seriously, stop tying to jam square pegs in round holes just for the sake of it. Your kooky fits are just plain old worse then the norm. At least he's trying something. Honestly, this community could use more people willing to try something off the wall, even at the risk that it's less efficient or more costly than what literally everyone else and their mother uses, not fewer. If he wants to keep tossing ideas out there, good or bad, let him. At worst, it may spark an interest in someone to experiment rather than settle. The issue people have are folks like this https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=472024&find=unread, the op got ganked in a mackinaw that had no rigs an empty mid slots apart from a small (yes small!!!) shield booster. She then comes to the forums, first to complain and be laughed at yes, but hopefully to then seek out a decent fit. Now go google/eve forum search for kronos builds. What do we have? Arthurs wackyness. I don't think anyone begrudges him just playing with his fits, but he keeps posting them on the forums where new players will presumably look for help when they find them. Thats why its important to put appropriate fiting advice in his threads, so we don't have to deal with some poor hopeless newbie whose undocked in jita and promptly been ganked with: Kronos: a forum thread told me this was good Caldari Navy 350mm Railgun AM Caldari Navy 350mm Railgun AM Caldari Navy 350mm Railgun AM Caldari Navy 350mm Railgun AM bastion salvager salvager salvager Gist X-Type 500MN Microwarpdrive Pithum A-type Adaptive Invulnerability Field Gist X-Type Large Shield Booster Cap Recharger II Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Shadow Serpentis Magnetic Field Stabilizer Will gank for food
The Bigpuns Touring New Eden Haven. 114	Posted - 2016.03.04 16:02:19 - [10] - Quote I don't object in principle to people trying new things, but at least acknowledge that your new things have worse stats than the norm, or are needlessly blingy, or are not what people normally do for xyz reason. Arthur is currently the most prolific thread creator on the web, and people searching for good fits are likely to stumble on one of his fits. It is the way of things for publicly posted fits to be critiqued. And in this case, the review is not favourable.

Arthur Aihaken CODE.d 5012	Posted - 2016.03.05 16:23:37 - [11] - Quote The Bigpuns wrote: But seriously, stop tying to jam square pegs in round holes just for the sake of it. Your kooky fits are just plain old worse then the norm. Maybe you should push back from the monitor for a bit. You're entirely too negative... I prefer the 350's over the 425's because they have a faster rate of fire and twice the ammunition capacity. I find them better at picking off smaller ships and roughly the same against battleships. Some players prefer neutron blaster cannons with Null ammo, so hey - whatever works. I honestly don't know what the problem is. It's not like I don't post a disclaimer with my 'abstract' fits, and I certainly don't claim that they are the cheapest, perfect or ideal fit for all agents and regions. I would welcome more of an open dialog for discussing ideas and takes on more traditional fits without a lot of the hostility. The Bigpuns wrote: I don't object in principle to people trying new things, but at least acknowledge that your new things have worse stats than the norm, or are needlessly blingy, or are not what people normally do for xyz reason. I think it goes without saying that a lot of my abstract fits are this. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Atomeon The Scope Gallente Federation 68	Posted - 2016.03.06 02:06:49 - [12] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: I honestly don't know what the problem is. The problem is.... You ignore Ships Bonuses, such as Armor repairs...
Amanda Chan Tyrant's Short Bus Syndicate 78	Posted - 2016.03.07 16:55:08 - [13] - Quote Atomeon wrote: Arthur Aihaken wrote: I honestly don't know what the problem is. The problem is.... You ignore Ships Bonuses, such as Armor repairs... If he's not running into tanking issues(which no marauder should), then why not ignore the armor rep bonus? If I can shield tank something to squeeze out more dps in the lows. Then why not? Granted, I wouldn't take this fit into a 10/10, but for level 4 missions I could see this easily doable.
The Bigpuns Touring New Eden Haven. 117	Posted - 2016.03.09 10:09:30 - [14] - Quote Amanda Chan wrote: Atomeon wrote: Arthur Aihaken wrote: I honestly don't know what the problem is. The problem is.... You ignore Ships Bonuses, such as Armor repairs... If he's not running into tanking issues(which no marauder should), then why not ignore the armor rep bonus? If I can shield tank something to squeeze out more dps in the lows. Then why not? Granted, I wouldn't take this fit into a 10/10, but for level 4 missions I could see this easily doable. He hasn't squeezed out more dps. He has the same dps, worse application, worse tank(which as you've pointed out is irrelevant if it's still sufficient, until the following point) and is a loot pinata.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.