Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
600
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 06:12:39 -
[1] - Quote
I am curious to know if they will make command battleships if the boosting is put on grid, for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. Was there anything stated on this or can a beautiful blue tag person respond? |

Zappity
Black Aces I N F A M O U S
2712
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 06:23:16 -
[2] - Quote
You can find a quote from CCP Fozzie in the recently released CSM minutes where he says that the plan has not changed. Links are still going on grid but no date yet.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1101
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 10:11:01 -
[3] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:I am curious to know if they will make command battleships if the boosting is put on grid, for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. Well, some of CSs can withstand some serious beating...
Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
14459
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 11:06:09 -
[4] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote: for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. i think you should probably try flying one before making a statement like that because you couldn't be farther from the truth. command ships are pretty damn scary if you fit them for anything that isnt off grid boosting.
infact the only reason you dont see doctrine fits for them allover the place is their prohibitive training requirements
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Julien Brellier
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 11:15:15 -
[5] - Quote
Now that grid is at least 7,800Km across, there is simply no excuse for links not being on grid.
Lots of room for them to run away and hide from the enemy. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3013
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 11:15:45 -
[6] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: infact the only reason you dont see doctrine fits for them allover the place is their prohibitive training requirements
That aren't actually very prohibitive. The bigger reason you don't see them is because we are playing frigates & cruisers online because of mobility issues for BC's & BS, and the larger EHP doesn't make up for that mobility when cruisers project nearly the same firepower, have vastly greater resistance to bombs and can get around from A to B far faster for just a small EHP difference.
But yes, when links go on grid CS will be fine. Since you won't be restricted to just a single CS boosting your fleet anymore, so they won't be such obvious targets since you can have 10 or 20 all giving boosts, so you have significant redundancy. Assuming they follow current plans. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
14461
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 11:24:53 -
[7] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote: infact the only reason you dont see doctrine fits for them allover the place is their prohibitive training requirements
That aren't actually very prohibitive. The bigger reason you don't see them is because we are playing frigates & cruisers online because of mobility issues for BC's & BS, and the larger EHP doesn't make up for that mobility when cruisers project nearly the same firepower, have vastly greater resistance to bombs and can get around from A to B far faster for just a small EHP difference. But yes, when links go on grid CS will be fine. Since you won't be restricted to just a single CS boosting your fleet anymore, so they won't be such obvious targets since you can have 10 or 20 all giving boosts, so you have significant redundancy. Assuming they follow current plans. they are fairly prohibitive if you haven't grandfathered the skills nor trained as a booster. my alt can fly the Armour ones but my main (this character) still has an 80 day train for them.
definitely not going to dispute the mobility issues though, they are damn painfull to fly anything more than a couple of jumps
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
600
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 14:43:02 -
[8] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Bunnie Hop wrote: for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. i think you should probably try flying one before making a statement like that because you couldn't be farther from the truth. command ships are pretty damn scary if you fit them for anything that isnt off grid boosting. infact the only reason you dont see doctrine fits for them allover the place is their prohibitive training requirements
I can fly all races of command ships and do, but there are situations I can foresee them to be very inadequate on grid. |

Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2986
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 16:37:45 -
[9] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:I am curious to know if they will make command battleships if the boosting is put on grid, for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. Was there anything stated on this or can a beautiful blue tag person respond? Command ships can be vary tanky, with certain ships (looking at you damnation) getting rediculous amounts of tank.
With alpa strikes always being an issue, there's not much that can be done to counter it without breaking it.
Itll be interesting to see how different groups try to use them. Redundant boosts, using multiple T1, kiting command Dessie's, etc. |

Ibutho Inkosi
Irubo Kovu
212
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 20:22:10 -
[10] - Quote
Nothing boosts my confidence as much as being referred to a quote by Fozzie. I live for enduring the logical downward spiral of CCP's hiring practices. It's a... thing....
As long as the tale of the hunt is told by the hunter, and not the lion, it will favor the hunter.
|

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
2157
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 20:23:31 -
[11] - Quote
Julien Brellier wrote:Now that grid is at least 7,800Km across, there is simply no excuse for links not being on grid.
Lots of room for them to run away and hide from the enemy.
Links are not just being brought "on grid", so abandon all hope of sitting 7000KM away from the actual fight with your link ship (which would only be about 3% less lame than OGB).
Range-limited AOE effects, possibly in the form of a bubble-probe type thing that is dropped in place, is the plan last they spoke of it.
"Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
|

Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2645
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 21:06:35 -
[12] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote: infact the only reason you dont see doctrine fits for them allover the place is their prohibitive training requirements
That aren't actually very prohibitive. The bigger reason you don't see them is because we are playing frigates & cruisers online because of mobility issues for BC's & BS, and the larger EHP doesn't make up for that mobility when cruisers project nearly the same firepower, have vastly greater resistance to bombs and can get around from A to B far faster for just a small EHP difference. But yes, when links go on grid CS will be fine. Since you won't be restricted to just a single CS boosting your fleet anymore, so they won't be such obvious targets since you can have 10 or 20 all giving boosts, so you have significant redundancy. Assuming they follow current plans.
We are running a BC doctrine so up-shipping to command ship would be possible without crippling our mobility. Mobility is not the only possible issue why people don't fleet them up. |

Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2645
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 21:07:57 -
[13] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:Julien Brellier wrote:Now that grid is at least 7,800Km across, there is simply no excuse for links not being on grid.
Lots of room for them to run away and hide from the enemy. Links are not just being brought "on grid", so abandon all hope of sitting 7000KM away from the actual fight with your link ship (which would only be about 3% less lame than OGB). Range-limited AOE effects, possibly in the form of a bubble-probe type thing that is dropped in place, is the plan last they spoke of it.
I wonder if the sphere of effect will be displayed and how it will look. Especially if bubbles are also involve. I hope if's not too much of a clusterfuck to look at. |

Zappity
Black Aces I N F A M O U S
2714
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 23:34:54 -
[14] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:Julien Brellier wrote:Now that grid is at least 7,800Km across, there is simply no excuse for links not being on grid.
Lots of room for them to run away and hide from the enemy. Links are not just being brought "on grid", so abandon all hope of sitting 7000KM away from the actual fight with your link ship (which would only be about 3% less lame than OGB). Range-limited AOE effects, possibly in the form of a bubble-probe type thing that is dropped in place, is the plan last they spoke of it. I wonder if the sphere of effect will be displayed and how it will look. Especially if bubbles are also involve. I hope if's not too much of a clusterfuck to look at. I can't stand the current range sphere. I wish there was an option to just have the range circles.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33427
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 09:29:32 -
[15] - Quote
ZAPPITY PANDEMIC HORDE, WHY??? NOOOOOOO 
fine. I'm shooting you first.
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Zappity
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
2716
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 10:46:25 -
[16] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:ZAPPITY PANDEMIC HORDE, WHY??? NOOOOOOO  fine. I'm shooting you first. :) I would be honoured! I'm usually so safe at the bottom of the alphabet.
I've had an alt in there for a while and the casual style fits well at the moment.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33428
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 11:32:13 -
[17] - Quote
lol. Totally worth taking the heat for broadcasting you.
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2646
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 13:57:29 -
[18] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Rain6637 wrote:ZAPPITY PANDEMIC HORDE, WHY??? NOOOOOOO  fine. I'm shooting you first. :) I would be honoured! I'm usually so safe at the bottom of the alphabet. I've had an alt in there for a while and the casual style fits well at the moment.
If you sort by name twice, you are pretty much first tho... |

Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
3628
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 14:22:54 -
[19] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:I am curious to know if they will make command battleships if the boosting is put on grid, for I don't think a battlecruiser class ship could withstand the damage for too long. Was there anything stated on this or can a beautiful blue tag person respond?
Once I saw a command ship fit for pure bricktank repeatedly survive a full Alpha Mael fleet's volleys for a good 15-20 minutes, on and off focusing it during the fight. Whenever their logi started topping it off we'd go back to regular targets and then swap back to it later. Eventually he popped, but he was a frequent primary and was alive more than half the battle.
I think they'll be fine. |

Loradan Illstari
Heretic Army I N F A M O U S
8
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 14:45:23 -
[20] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:But but but... my links won't invincible anymore!
Good, they aren't supposed to be. That's the whole point of this change. |

Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
600
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 14:48:01 -
[21] - Quote
Loradan Illstari wrote:Bunnie Hop wrote:But but but... my links won't invincible anymore! Good, they aren't supposed to be. That's the whole point of this change.
Only idiots change others quotes. My question had nothing to do with invincibility, I just wondered if they were considering a battleship hull for commands. |

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33428
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 15:13:12 -
[22] - Quote
Only a sith deals in absolutes
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Remiel Pollard
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
7548
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 15:38:04 -
[23] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:Only a sith deals in absolutes
Did anyone else switch on to the irony the moment Obi-Wan said this and realise that he was stating an absolute, or was that just me? It was literally the line I hated most out of all the Star Wars movies, even more than "NOOOOOOOOOOOO!"
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|

Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33429
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 17:06:19 -
[24] - Quote
yes it is a very ironicat thing to say
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|

Loradan Illstari
Heretic Army I N F A M O U S
8
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 17:08:46 -
[25] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:Loradan Illstari wrote:Bunnie Hop wrote:But but but... my links won't invincible anymore! Good, they aren't supposed to be. That's the whole point of this change. Only idiots change others quotes. My question had nothing to do with invincibility, I just wondered if they were considering a battleship hull for commands.
Commandships already have huge tanks. If you flew or fit one, you'd know that. So what if they can't hack it when 10 billion people are shooting at them. No ship can and they aren't mean to. |

Terminal Insanity
Pwn 'N Play SpaceMonkey's Alliance
895
|
Posted - 2016.03.03 19:49:11 -
[26] - Quote
i really like the offgrid boosters. Not because i use them, but because its fun as hell to hunt them down.
But i guess that bit of emergent gameplay is being axed, and we're just replacing it with another primary on the grid.
"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |