EVE Search - Rate my Rokh

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Rate my Rokh

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:01:00 - [1] I've been thinking of doing something a bit different with the Rokh. Instead of hybrids I was thinking of using it kind of like a Nosphoon that's easier to fit and tanks a bit better: Rokh 'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher [18xInferno Torpedo] 'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher [18xInferno Torpedo] 'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher [18xInferno Torpedo] 'Arbalest' Siege Missile Launcher [18xInferno Torpedo] Heavy Nosferatu II Heavy Nosferatu II Heavy Nosferatu II Heavy Nosferatu II Gist A-Type 100MN MicroWarpdrive Domination Warp Scrambler Domination Stasis Webifier Dread Guristas X-Large Shield Booster Dread Guristas Invulnerability Field Dread Guristas Invulnerability Field Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II Power Diagnostic System II Rigs : Capacitor Control Circuit I \ Capacitor Control Circuit I \ Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I \ Hammerhead II Hammerhead II Hammerhead II Hammerhead II Hammerhead II 10308 shield, 14.49/s, E/T/K/Ex=76/73/79/86 8750 armor, E/T/K/Ex=59/44/25/10 5953.499459266675 cap, +24.11/s, -152.947/s 979.0 m/s 257.2 DPS I know thats a slightly expensive fit, but hey what are industrial alts for . Do you think it's even worth putting in front of another ships guns and go for a 'phoon or do you think it's viable. Thoughts and improvements welcome
Fortior STK Scientific INVICTUS.	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:02:00 - [2] I think that is going to be one expensive blue explosion.
wierchas noobhunter The Collective Against ALL Authorities	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:04:00 - [3] ghey
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:06:00 - [4] Originally by: Fortior I think that is going to be one expensive blue explosion. Pointers as to why?
enymphia Vortex. Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:09:00 - [5] dont throw away the bonus's to hybrids :(:(:( Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Petwraith ([email protected])
Kelhund	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:10:00 - [6] well other than the fact my Ferox has a better tank than that......
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:16:00 - [7] Originally by: enymphia dont throw away the bonus's to hybrids :(:(:( Hrrrm.....it was the lack of damage bonus to hybrids that made me want to get rid of them in the first place. To the person who said a Ferox tanks better, with the same midslots and the same boni, how precisely?
Commander Nikolas Gallente Arcana Imperii Ltd. The Cartel.	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:19:00 - [8] Why do Caldari people keep trying to put missiles on the Rokh? Use a raven! with a similiar idea... Rokh = Hybrid Platform Raven = Missile Platform If you are unsure, I will happily 1 v 1 you with my Hybrid based Rokh. Winner keeps loot. Convo me in game if you want to take me up on that.
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:22:00 - [9] Originally by: Commander Nikolas Why do Caldari people keep trying to put missiles on the Rokh? Use a raven! with a similiar idea... Rokh = Hybrid Platform Raven = Missile Platform If you are unsure, I will happily 1 v 1 you with my Hybrid based Rokh. Winner keeps loot. Convo me in game if you want to take me up on that. Heh it was just theoretical , just trying to do something different with the ship.
Mjojjnir Caldari Lighten Your Load Industry	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:28:00 - [10] If you really want to use a nos//torp rokh then you'd be better of with nanos//inertials in lows so that you can achieve a decent speed.
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 12:35:00 - [11] Originally by: Mjojjnir If you really want to use a nos//torp rokh then you'd be better of with nanos//inertials in lows so that you can achieve a decent speed. Yeah I had look at that....2.3km/s with domination nano's, a snake set and a gist MWD....didn't quite cut it for the massive sig. /me goes back to using cookiecutters
JoCool Anarchy Technologies	Posted - 2007.02.09 13:02:00 - [12] Your 4 Heavy Nosferatus Ii and the 4 Arbalest Siege Launchers indicate you want to outlast your opponent. Your damage output is rather low. However, your 3 slot tank will not be strong enough to ensure that you can defend yourself long and strong enough. It will be overwhelmed while you do no damage and you'll horribly die with full capacitor to many oppponents' ships while the other parties' caps are halved. _______________________________________________________________________ Trey Azagthoth > Youre my idol Jocool. I wanna be like Jocool jr. or Jocool the sequel! Oveur > ohnoes jocool
Phish1 Liberty Forces Ratel Alliance	Posted - 2007.02.09 14:01:00 - [13] stupid setup TBH nos on the slowest BS in game with no I-stabs very expensive modules on a ship that sucks so much... you need to go through a system called LXQ2-T at 2000 eve time tonight and say hi to me =D
Alyth Gallente Battle Tech	Posted - 2007.02.09 14:48:00 - [14] Originally by: JoCool Your 4 Heavy Nosferatus Ii and the 4 Arbalest Siege Launchers indicate you want to outlast your opponent. Your damage output is rather low. However, your 3 slot tank will not be strong enough to ensure that you can defend yourself long and strong enough. It will be overwhelmed while you do no damage and you'll horribly die with full capacitor to many oppponents' ships while the other parties' caps are halved. The idea was to outlast them by sucking them dry, hence the weak-ish tank. With no enemy tank to beat, damage output isn't really an issue in solo fights. If I adjusted it to be a gang ship I could quite possibly drop the tackling gear and fit a harder tank, maybe with an injector. Anyways, thanks for the feedback.
Riho Red Wrath Exquisite Malevolence	Posted - 2007.02.09 14:59:00 - [15] Originally by: Alyth Originally by: JoCool Your 4 Heavy Nosferatus Ii and the 4 Arbalest Siege Launchers indicate you want to outlast your opponent. Your damage output is rather low. However, your 3 slot tank will not be strong enough to ensure that you can defend yourself long and strong enough. It will be overwhelmed while you do no damage and you'll horribly die with full capacitor to many oppponents' ships while the other parties' caps are halved. The idea was to outlast them by sucking them dry, hence the weak-ish tank. With no enemy tank to beat, damage output isn't really an issue in solo fights. If I adjusted it to be a gang ship I could quite possibly drop the tackling gear and fit a harder tank, maybe with an injector. Anyways, thanks for the feedback. passive t2 fitted drake would BBQ u good... allso a myrmidon (all of them have a inj enyways so doesnt matter if its nos or blaster) and concidering how meny of those are around... :P ur setup is broken Great being Gallente... aint it ?

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.