Disapointed that this was made to be a non exploit in the recent patch, let me explain the problem.

WHY ccp have you made this possible after being an exploit (iirc) before? Very one sided. no?

I pay for my subscription as much as the surrendering corp monkeys. So could you pretty please change it back, G MAN prefered it the other way!

For the lack of intelligence in the OP, here is reference material

That was 2 months ago. Announced by a GM. No, it wasn't recent and its beyond old news. Keeping up with me or will it take 2 more months to sink in ?


1. Its meta gaming. Players have the right to Fck over everyone they want be it you vs them or them avoiding you. Its also an isk sink, you by blowing your 2 mill and they avoid it OR running an internal dec shield that raises the cost using an alliance of their own when you try to dec someone.
2. Mr. Pot meet Mr. Kettle. You pay a subscription and amazingly the other players pay a subscription. Who has the right of way? The **** throwing out wardecs left and right or the players not interested in it? BTW, wardecs are only needed for highsec so GTFO and go to null/low where a wardec isn't need. Problem with EVE, its a grey area of who has the sandbox and gets to dictate who does what.

Thanks for your opinionated post, you sound mad, there's no need to be mad


Was an exploit and now isn't, Why?

This is an unintended game mechanic and it will be fixed as soon as possible.

i find it stupid... declare war... so what? you become vulnerable just because someone wants to shoot you? No, you need to accept war for it to go active.

It is like one sided marriage. I will marry you, you just give.

One sided interaction will never go well, people will find ways to avoid it and escape from unwanted stuff.

butthurt

U MAD BRO?

and

CAN I HAZ UR STUFFZ?

Because no bugs are being exploited, and you can still shoot them.

And yet it was an exploit because it made use of game mechanics to cause unwanted effects GÇö most notably complete safety for corp assets. It doesn't have to be a bug to be an exploit, you knowGǪ

GǪand it is indeed a problem because no, you can't shoot them. This policy change renders game mechanics obsolete, and that is very bad in and of itself GÇö it means they're contradicting their own game play. The fact that it also renders highsec POSes impossible to destroy is even worse because it breaks the economy and industry part of the game.

And yet it was an exploit because it made use of game mechanics to cause unwanted effects GÇö most notably complete safety for corp assets. It doesn't have to be a bug to be an exploit, you knowGǪ

GǪand it is indeed a problem because no, you can't shoot them. This policy change renders game mechanics obsolete, and that is very bad in and of itself GÇö it means they're contradicting their own game play. The fact that it also renders highsec POSes impossible to destroy is even worse because it breaks the economy and industry part of the game.

Go to low & null, problem solved.

And yet it was an exploit because it made use of game mechanics to cause unwanted effects GÇö most notably complete safety for corp assets. It doesn't have to be a bug to be an exploit, you knowGǪ

GǪand it is indeed a problem because no, you can't shoot them. This policy change renders game mechanics obsolete, and that is very bad in and of itself GÇö it means they're contradicting their own game play. The fact that it also renders highsec POSes impossible to destroy is even worse because it breaks the economy and industry part of the game.

Really? Since when am I unable to open fire on whoever and whatever I want in high-sec?

Only a matter of time until it runs out of fuel if they can't refill the thing. And a fat lot of good that POS does them if they can't undock without being ganked.

Go to low & null, problem solved.

You can open fire. It won't have any effect.
Refilling it (and undocking) without being ganked is trivial.

The fact remains: this policy change has made highsec POSes invulnerable. It is therefore inherently a bad change and needs to be reverted and/or requires a drastic change of the mechanics to allow for their destruction again.

Its a Tippia post, but to prevent her from making alot of one question posts here is one option.

Mother F*cking Ice Belts.

BANG! Problem solved. It worked for Goons and 1/4th of the empire type, get the other 3 involved and shake EVE to the core. Hulkaggeddon comming up....why not buy up alot of isotopes (involves a lot of people working together BTW), get hulkaggeddon pilots to focus on ice belts (don't need a reason to rub one out over barges/exhumers as they die so easy and hey, might as well blow 2 birds with one stone ), and extend that for a greater duration. POS are not invulnerable, you just need to stop thinking of AFK shooting one down and hit it below the belt and guess what...it won't be profitable for long to keep running a POS if your fuel costs go up outstripping the income it generates.