| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zen Lena
11
   |
Posted - 2016.05.04 18:52:31 -
[1] - Quote
I was setting up a neut ship and EFT says the fit is cap stable. However, ingame fit says no. Which is correct? |
Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
15416
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 18:58:25 -
[2] - Quote
Ingame > eft
Also pvp fits are rarely cap stable.
Whatcha fiiiiiiting?
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
Zen Lena
11
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 19:11:18 -
[3] - Quote
I was trying to fit a neuting Osprey navy issue. 3 medium neuts w/ a medium cap booster. and also tried a 4 medium neut Ashimmu w/ cap booster. Both said cap stable via EFT but ingame was different. |
Paranoid Loyd
8981
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 19:38:28 -
[4] - Quote
EFT uses the modules you have activated and accounts for the cap boosters, ingame assumses everthing is on and AFAIK doesn't account for cap boosters.
Fix the Prospect! New Server Hardware!
|
Luscius Uta
Anomalous Existence
Low-Class
212
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 19:39:04 -
[5] - Quote
That's because ingame fits never take cap influx injected through cap boosters in equation. It basically considers a cap booster to be a module doing nothing at all. Also, if you have a dual-prop fit it will assume you'll have both mwd and afterburner running at the same, resulting in a much shorter cap life than in reality, and if you have a mjd it will ignore reactivation delay. So, ingame fitting browser can display inaccurate results.
Workarounds are not bugfixes.
|
Gully Alex Foyle
Black Fox Marauders
4391
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 20:31:47 -
[6] - Quote
It's also because EFT considers (correctly) the capacitor's max recharge rate, while in-game considers average recharge rate.
Capacitor doesn't recharge linearly, it's max at around 30% IIRC. It recharges slower if less than or greater than 30%.
Make space glamorous!
Is EVE dying or not? Ask the EVE-O Death-o-meter!
|
Tsukino Stareine
Art Of Explosions
404 Hole Not Found
1444
|
Posted - 2016.05.05 10:51:01 -
[7] - Quote
EFT is broken atm as well, cap usage isn't correct and also will tell you you're not stable even with positive cap delta.
|
Zen Lena
11
|
Posted - 2016.05.05 13:26:07 -
[8] - Quote
Luscius Uta wrote:That's because ingame fits never take cap influx injected through cap boosters in equation. It basically considers a cap booster to be a module doing nothing at all. Also, if you have a dual-prop fit it will assume you'll have both mwd and afterburner running at the same, resulting in a much shorter cap life than in reality, and if you have a mjd it will ignore reactivation delay. So, ingame fitting browser can display inaccurate results.
Gotcha. Glad to hear that EFT is correct then. Thanks |
Kaska Iskalar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
64
|
Posted - 2016.05.06 15:58:30 -
[9] - Quote
Zen Lena wrote:I was setting up a neut ship and EFT says the fit is cap stable. However, ingame fit says no. Which is correct?
Why are you trying to make a PvP ship cap stable? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |