Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Durban Kronic
Amarr Space Marines
5
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 10:55:16 -
[1] - Quote
I have read recently a few forum posts on this topic but from quite a long time ago and as I am a returning player I am wondering if EvE has a system where positive security status effects your character in any way beneficial 
I understand that many people would abuse the system because if you were a pirate you could simply gain a few points in security standing and then continue your reign of terror 
It just seems to me like we should be getting a significant bounty increase or enhanced drop rate, something that impacts mission runners in a way that gets them up in the morning!  |

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16752
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 11:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah, the local police dont shoot at your face when they see it. Seems a fairly big benifit to me.
Beyond that, why should players be penalised for pvp again?
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
34
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 11:43:10 -
[3] - Quote
Ignore the like farmer. The positive security status generally denotes trust, but that can be deceptive. People can be pirate even with 5.0 sec status, they just grind it back up as quick as possible/simply coincidentally by ratting. Consider it "bay boy" credits, that are paid for by shooting what Concord wants dead, much like with war dec's Concord turn a blind eye and penalize those who do their objectives less than those who do nothing for them. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12532
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 11:52:32 -
[4] - Quote
Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle.
OP - no benefits (either now or in the foreseeable future, I'm afraid), but I believe that at one point it was possible to get 5.5 positive sec status through a COSMOS mission, IIRC...a true badge for the real carebear! 
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
26306
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 11:58:54 -
[5] - Quote
Celeste Coeval wrote:The positive security status generally denotes trust, but that can be deceptive. People can be pirate even with 5.0 sec status, Indeed they can, although being a pirate doesn't necessarily involve losing security status for acts of piracy.
Quote: they just grind it back up as quick as possible/simply coincidentally by ratting. A couple of years ago maybe, the system no longer gives the boost to sec status that you think it does.
Quote: Consider it "bay boy" credits, that are paid for by shooting what Concord wants dead, That would be tags, more efficient than ratting, more expensive too.
Quote:much like with war dec's Concord turn a blind eye Which is the whole point of wardecs, they're essentially a licence to hunt certain game in Concords game park.
Quote: and penalize those who do their objectives less than those who do nothing for them. What?
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|

Valkin Mordirc
2171
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 12:04:09 -
[6] - Quote
Quote:Ignore the like farmer
Translation: I am Jelly of all the likes you have, and I aspire to someday reach the stars that you have set for us mortal's.
#DeleteTheWeak
|

Memphis Baas
1690
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 12:05:10 -
[7] - Quote
10 years ago, sec status was the same as "standings with Concord", and they had agents that could give missions, with + increase with all empires. So CCP removed that link between sec status and standings, and removed the agents.
So now, if you're above 0, it just means that you have more buffer for your piracy or suicide ganking before you go negative.
And the regular penalties apply if you go negative. |

Shallanna Yassavi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
251
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 12:32:15 -
[8] - Quote
The wardec alliances have a lot of 5.0 security status characters in them because: 1: Locator agents and reputation. 2: They buy off CONCORD so they don't get hit for their bear-farming activities. 3: Flashy yellows of opportunity.
A signature :o
|

Durban Kronic
Amarr Space Marines
5
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 14:50:03 -
[9] - Quote
Thanks everyone for summing that up.
It's a shame that they don't do more with these systems in-game but I suppose there are a lot of other things that compensate for the slight irregularity systems they no longer have interest in!  |

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
44
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 15:43:24 -
[10] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle.
To you. |
|

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
775
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 15:45:17 -
[11] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Beyond that, why should players be penalised for pvp again?
i can *understand* security status hits for hostile acts in hisec....... but for the love of BoB, why are we penalised so heavily in LowSec?
In two years of playing, I've committed a total of three (3) criminal acts in HiSec, two of which were within the last 24 hours. Yet I have a -9.9 security status.
CCPL0X STOP HATE LOWSEXC!
Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze
This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura
|

W33b3l
Conquest and Kittens
109
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 17:00:47 -
[12] - Quote
I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16760
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 17:02:47 -
[13] - Quote
W33b3l wrote:I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.
but again, why penalize the pvp oriented players?
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Buliki
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 17:26:24 -
[14] - Quote
Durban Kronic wrote:Thanks everyone for summing that up. It's a shame that they don't do more with these systems in-game but I suppose there are a lot of other things that compensate for the slight irregularity systems they no longer have interest in! 
Yes like camera shakes or [insert hundreds of examples here] |

Buliki
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 17:27:52 -
[15] - Quote
W33b3l wrote:I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.
So cool that I always thought it worked that way until now I'm not sure anymore... wtf?! |

W33b3l
Conquest and Kittens
110
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 17:34:06 -
[16] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:W33b3l wrote:I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.
but again, why penalize the pvp oriented players?
Consider it "highsec content creation" :P
But honestly having a mechanic like that would make sense. As long as you dont dip below -2 or whatever the number is currently arbitrary. If you lowsec pirate just do some ratting before going out in your mining barge. Assuming you do that.
Unless you are talking about the fact it would be harder to highsec gank care bears... Wich really isn't PVP to be honest, doing that should be difficult if the target is fit correctly. As for the other end of it. You could find people mining with -1 status and gank them easy.
Although I've always felt that loosing sec status in lowsec (other then podding) is kind of stupid because theres not any authorities out there to see it happen. They could lower the fine for killing people in lowsec to help counter act it.
Just saying it would be cool if it worked that way. Consequences for actions and all that. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12538
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 18:49:49 -
[17] - Quote
Celeste Coeval wrote:Bumblefck wrote:Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle. To you.
On the contrary, I think you've undermined your swill to everyone here.
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
48
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 19:44:56 -
[18] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Celeste Coeval wrote:Bumblefck wrote:Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle. To you. On the contrary, I think you've undermined your swill to everyone here.
somethings in the eve community never change and the forum warrior brotherhood is one of them. You talk as if I have peddled this "swill" in copious amounts, compared to the meme'd to death forum garbage that alot of you folks seem to find endlessly amusing, degrading and ultimately belittling to well thought out and genuine questions and critiques. I haven't posted in years and the first thing this guy says to me in a post I spent a good deal of time typing and thinking about is "TL;DR IBTL". These are the actions of someone who thinks they can shut something down before it gets a chance to get going and someone who is fishing for likes. Ralph might be all of the things you say, but that's your experience, not mine. That post didn't get locked, nor will it.
Bumblefck, you seem to think you are entitled to speak for everyone here as does Ralph, you aren't, the likes have gone to your heads, it's the same on Facebook and elsewhere on the t'internets, it's narcissistic and shallow. You are a like farmer too. Before anyone accuses me of being envious in some way, I am not, I just have spent long enough on the web to spot self-aggrandizement when I see it.
Queue the pseudo "we don't care what you think" responses to this post. |

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12539
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 20:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Quote:the likes have gone to your heads
I think if you honestly believe this then there is a fundamental disconnect going on in your reasoning somewhere.
My point was that Ralph's contributions - feel free to look back through his posting history - have a consistency of being honest, straightforward, and helpful (if sometimes amusingly irreverent). Just take a look back through a random selection of NCQ&A threads, to get a taste.
I'm speaking to you from the position of being able to see the tangible results of his posts, not from the position of defending a fellow 'like farmer'. There is nothing to suggest in his first post that self-aggrandisement was in play.
I found the post you're referring to.
This is what you're so upset about. Given that your OP in that thread was fairly meandering and full of anecdotes, is it unreasonable to assume that some people would value succinctness over verbosity? I'm not saying it was badly written (it's not), but your response to him was way over the top - especially as what you posted was basically a rant.
By shutting him down automatically in this thread, based on what he posted in that thread (with no regard to this thread's post's content), you really are no better than the 'the forum warrior brotherhood' you despise.
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16765
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 20:19:30 -
[20] - Quote
Ill give you that, i was expecting a lock for a rant and miss judged, my fault for skim reading. I still think its a silly point to stick on though, sort of like arguing that the at ships are imballanced.
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|
|

Eternus8lux8lucis
Primus Inc. LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
812
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 20:30:04 -
[21] - Quote
Most people have answered the questions posed already but Ill add my two cents.
Way back in the day you could go up to +10 standing as well as -10. But it was so easy to go into null and rat for a single day or two to get the standings back from -10 that CCP changed it to +5 and made rats count less to standings. Like others alluded to you could get positive standings for factions only so you could be +10 with all factions and have had the +10 standings with concord as well with all the enviable results. Reprocessing in stations was perfect at 6.66 corp standing status, POSs before the changes needed 8.0 standings to anchor in a 0.8 system, 7.0 for 0.7, etc and of course agents needed the required faction standings. These were all tied into concord standings as one and the same but again CCP took those and divided the two. Btw if you have low Concord standings avoid the Concord systems as they will do the same if you are KOS as if you committed a criminal act anywhere.
The sec status gains above 5.0 were still implemented last time I checked and there are two missions you can do ONCE in your eve career, like the COSMOS agents, that will reward you with that above 5.0 standings. Afaik you dont get anything other than the epeen badge of ultimate carebearism though. And if you lose that sec you will never get it back.
CCP has removed sec status and standings and their importance over the years and there is little to no reason to care anymore other than a slightly different playstyle. I like W33bl3's idea quite frankly to make it be a thing again. But the crying from the ganker crowd will put a sock in that fast. I also think that low sec needs to have way less of a standings hit for ships but not pods, but again I think this will fall on deaf ears.
I used to consider my sec status as a commodity that if not used was worthless. So I would go about until I was close to 5.0 and then go gank. You could get in about 6 or so ganks before you got near 0.0 again and then go on with your life. This changed when crimewatch came into effect as now you could sell your killrights. Before that knowing your target wouldnt ever come find you was most beneficial in selecting gank targets. But now they can sell your killright so its not as beneficial a commodity in the same way. But now of course theres so much isk having your own dedicated -10 gank alt is more a thing.... or having 2, 5 or 10 like some people out there do.
I would love to see it BE a commodity much like tags for sec. Have those with high sec extract and sell tags to those with low sec for isk as well. Or at least something. ANYTHING is better than what it is now. I used to matter and Id love to see stuff matter again. But I think like real life its just imaginary.
There is NO beneficial reason to have a higher sec status and it is a shame on CCPs part. But with so many of the player base crying about "REAL" issues that need fixing Im sure something like sec status and standings are likely on the **** pile of the totem pole over there far off to the left, no no way on back there over those mountain ranges, nope dont stop... clear across that ocean... yeaaah riiight about there. So no I dont believe CCP will change it anytime soon besides making it easier for the masses like the anchoring POSs issue in high sec to cave to the nullbears thatd have to run missions!! OMG!! in high sec?!?! to get THAT much standings to put up a POS like the rest of the player base did so you can put up those compression arrays everywhere. But dedicated toons for ganking or whatever are just as common as dedicated mission runners, incursion runners or anom running. Ultimately people see work and effort and scream. To think in a game billed as deep and long term is too much most often. Hand it to me on a silver platter or let me just shoot them like fish in a barrel is more "fun" but sinks to the least common denominator factor.
Wow... yeah...that went way too long and kinda rantish at the end. LOL So Ill stop there now..... for now. no, no Ill never let you all off that easy. 
Have you heard anything I've said?
You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?
That's right.
Had to end sometime.
|

W33b3l
Conquest and Kittens
112
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 21:17:22 -
[22] - Quote
Well sec status is a usable commodity in a sense. The only reason try to keep my sec status high is so i can go into lowsec and shoot people if i want. The higher your sec status the more "points" you have to spend on pointless missile barages on mission runners in lowsec before you have to worry about the cops when you fly back to "civilized" society.
I havnt done any pvp in awhile and im probably at care bear status right now. Ive always hated letting a juicy target go because i realized my sec status couldnt take the hit and had to go home.
Otherwise its useless. And the local police npcs are the only thing it effects. They should make it matter againm i was grinding standings with an alt so i could anchor pos's for people and was just about there the same time they removed the limitation. I was a little pissed. Same goes with scc. It will just get more pointless before it makes a difference. |

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
49
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 21:39:38 -
[23] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Quote:the likes have gone to your heads I think if you honestly believe this then there is a fundamental disconnect going on in your reasoning somewhere. My point was that Ralph's contributions - feel free to look back through his posting history - have a consistency of being honest, straightforward, and helpful (if sometimes amusingly irreverent). Just take a look back through a random selection of NCQ&A threads, to get a taste. I'm speaking to you from the position of being able to see the tangible results of his posts, not from the position of defending a fellow 'like farmer'. There is nothing to suggest in his first post that self-aggrandisement was in play. I found the post you're referring to.This is what you're so upset about. Given that your OP in that thread was fairly meandering and full of anecdotes, is it unreasonable to assume that some people would value succinctness over verbosity? I'm not saying it was badly written (it's not), but your response to him was way over the top - especially as what you posted was basically a rant. By shutting him down automatically in this thread, based on what he posted in that thread (with no regard to this thread's post's content), you really are no better than the 'the forum warrior brotherhood' you despise.
Glad you agree that there is a forum warrior brotherhood that shut people down for no reason. Yes it is a shame that you have to use something I did here to point out how wrong I am at being annoyed about someone else doing the same thing to me elsewhere, the difference is, I did it to make a point, you labelled what I said swill and yet have agreed that the party you are defending did the same thing, I think you call that a double standard.
|

Celeste Coeval
The Gosimer and Scarab
49
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 21:42:11 -
[24] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Ill give you that, i was expecting a lock for a rant and miss judged, my fault for skim reading. I still think its a silly point to stick on though, sort of like arguing that the at ships are imballanced.
Thanks for what you said here, perhaps I misjudged you too. I don't rant, I am very careful with what I post and take time to think about it.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16768
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 21:57:23 -
[25] - Quote
Celeste Coeval wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Ill give you that, i was expecting a lock for a rant and miss judged, my fault for skim reading. I still think its a silly point to stick on though, sort of like arguing that the at ships are imballanced. Thanks for what you said here, perhaps I misjudged you too. I don't rant, I am very careful with what I post and take time to think about it. Oh no worries, i am somewhat guilty of being an ireverant, flippant arse at times so you arent all that far from the mark. This is a videogame forum after all 
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Avaelica Kuershin
Paper Cats
266
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 22:16:37 -
[26] - Quote
I'd just like to point out that if one does not pod-kill, then one may get in a lot of ganks before going negative on security status. (I've only gone from 1.7 to 1.2, shouldn't take too long to build up the buffer again) |

Eternus8lux8lucis
Primus Inc. LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
813
|
Posted - 2016.07.10 22:48:05 -
[27] - Quote
W33b3l wrote:Well sec status is a usable commodity in a sense. The only reason try to keep my sec status high is so i can go into lowsec and shoot people if i want. The higher your sec status the more "points" you have to spend on pointless missile barages on mission runners in lowsec before you have to worry about the cops when you fly back to "civilized" society.
I havnt done any pvp in awhile and im probably at care bear status right now. Ive always hated letting a juicy target go because i realized my sec status couldnt take the hit and had to go home.
Otherwise its useless. And the local police npcs are the only thing it effects. They should make it matter againm i was grinding standings with an alt so i could anchor pos's for people and was just about there the same time they removed the limitation. I was a little pissed. Same goes with scc. It will just get more pointless before it makes a difference. Ive known quite a few people that did this as an isk service over the years. Back when one guy did it I think he got almost 200mil at that time, it was more before hand of course for brand new POS anchoring corps. Make corp with a cool name, wait 7 days for standings to kick in and hand over to an alt for isk with 0 standings and boom you could go anchor your POSs.
Most people dont care if they go full on pirate but a lot of people dont do the faction missions running L4s for exactly this reason so as not to lock themselves out of space and content. In the end its the same with sec status locking you out of areas. Yes some get a bit too uptight about it and now with dedicated alts its not nearly as bad as it was before. It was ironically the same thing with clone grades stopping certain alts from partaking in different activities. In the end it is about choices but Id love to see some changes there, yet again its not high priority for the "base" game which is all about pew pew and moar pew pew and epeen waving.
But its a nice way to spend all that isk, stuff and standings you get every now and again by shooting someone in the face here and there. And frankly I wish more people would do it. I know people sure wish I would undock more and pew pew.... or maybe just be their friend.... or something.... Too late for that tbh.
Have you heard anything I've said?
You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?
That's right.
Had to end sometime.
|

Sustrai Aditua
Intandofisa
359
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 02:29:05 -
[28] - Quote
Just another gizmo in the game what's gone all wobbly as the plumbers fix the old pipes in one place, they knock them out of whack further up the line. In this Fix-It-Even-If-It-Ain't-Broke world the list of these is rising so fast, pretty soon they won't know what to keep, and what to throw away...or, have we already gotten there?
If we get chased by zombies, I'm tripping you.
|

Morgan Agrivar
Peace.Keepers
360
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 02:44:24 -
[29] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Calling someone as prolific and helpful as Ralph a 'like farmer' is incredibly disingenuous (not to mention insulting), and completely undermines the swill you peddle. OP - no benefits (either now or in the foreseeable future, I'm afraid), but I believe that at one point it was possible to get 5.5 positive sec status through a COSMOS mission, IIRC...a true badge for the real carebear!  As soon as I noticed that I got my security status to 5.0, I went out and ganked a miner...pod too. That got me down to 3.0 and some breathing room to get it back up at my own pace.
Like Mr. Mustachio said here, no real benefit so don't worry about it.
This would cure me of the fear...
CCP Explorer liked you forum post. Now my life is complete...
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55634
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 06:39:36 -
[30] - Quote
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:
The sec status gains above 5.0 were still implemented last time I checked and there are two missions you can do ONCE in your eve career, like the COSMOS agents, that will reward you with that above 5.0 standings. Afaik you dont get anything other than the epeen badge of ultimate carebearism though. And if you lose that sec you will never get it back.
Those 2 Concord Agent missions were removed from the game a few years ago. I believe the reason CCP gave was that players had found a way to exploit them.

DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
|

Trevor Dalech
Absolute Obedience Resonance.
239
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 07:01:57 -
[31] - Quote
The advantage of positive sec status is that you look like a care bear. Then, if you rat in low sec systems, people will warp to you and get blown up. This is fun! (It's also fun if you get blown up yourself after a good fight!)
I had a lot more people picking fights with me back when I was +2 or +3 than now that I am -8... Now I have to go and look for fun instead of having fun come to me. 
That, and travelling through high-sec is a lot less cumbersome if you have positive sec. But who cares about high-sec anyways... |

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1421
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 07:45:47 -
[32] - Quote
Durban Kronic wrote:... It just seems to me like we should be getting a significant bounty increase or enhanced drop rate, something that impacts mission runners in a way that keeps them in hisec forever. 
Holy balls just no.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

Memphis Baas
1694
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 12:18:31 -
[33] - Quote
Maybe we could get just a lot more praise that includes the word "amazing", and maybe a plaque or two, and the free eyeglasses and our name and mug posted on the big screen TV's (like that guy in the citadels trailer), if we're the biggest carebear with the most missions completed, or whatever. |

Pandora Carrollon
Kingsman Tailors
421
|
Posted - 2016.07.11 18:21:40 -
[34] - Quote
Celeste Coeval wrote:To you.
Ralph KG doesn't farm likes. His good mind, pithy/appropriate words, and good insight get him those likes. Comments denigrating him sound far more like jealousy than wisdom, which when Ralph is sober is usually what he dispenses. When he's not so sober, he's generally on target with the sarcasm, it's kind of a double edged sword that works well for him.
Some people may always click like on his comments just because it's him, however, that's because he's likely helped them in the past and given freely of his time and energy to assist people in playing the game. He's done this with me, and many others on these boards.
(removed for reading page 2, which I had missed... drat! I was feeling feisty!)
As to the positive security status, I like mine that way. This latest event has been quite the booster to it.
Be Positive GÇó Change yourself first, New Eden will come later GÇó EVE is Awesome GÇó CCP isn't the enemy GÇó Players are people too GÇó Where're the clothing blueprints GÇó Yeah, I'm still learning this game
-- Pandora's Rules to EVE by
|

W33b3l
Conquest and Kittens
122
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 01:27:13 -
[35] - Quote
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:W33b3l wrote:Well sec status is a usable commodity in a sense. The only reason try to keep my sec status high is so i can go into lowsec and shoot people if i want. The higher your sec status the more "points" you have to spend on pointless missile barages on mission runners in lowsec before you have to worry about the cops when you fly back to "civilized" society.
I havnt done any pvp in awhile and im probably at care bear status right now. Ive always hated letting a juicy target go because i realized my sec status couldnt take the hit and had to go home.
Otherwise its useless. And the local police npcs are the only thing it effects. They should make it matter againm i was grinding standings with an alt so i could anchor pos's for people and was just about there the same time they removed the limitation. I was a little pissed. Same goes with scc. It will just get more pointless before it makes a difference. Ive known quite a few people that did this as an isk service over the years. Back when one guy did it I think he got almost 200mil at that time, it was more before hand of course for brand new POS anchoring corps. Make corp with a cool name, wait 7 days for standings to kick in and hand over to an alt for isk with 0 standings and boom you could go anchor your POSs. Most people dont care if they go full on pirate but a lot of people dont do the faction missions running L4s for exactly this reason so as not to lock themselves out of space and content. In the end its the same with sec status locking you out of areas. Yes some get a bit too uptight about it and now with dedicated alts its not nearly as bad as it was before. It was ironically the same thing with clone grades stopping certain alts from partaking in different activities. In the end it is about choices but Id love to see some changes there, yet again its not high priority for the "base" game which is all about pew pew and moar pew pew and epeen waving. But its a nice way to spend all that isk, stuff and standings you get every now and again by shooting someone in the face here and there. And frankly I wish more people would do it. I know people sure wish I would undock more and pew pew....  or maybe just be their friend.... or something....  Too late for that tbh.
Ya pretty much. The way the new camera performs, and the fact there is no in game browser anymore shows they have already crossed that line. I am a HUGE fan of how drone scanning works now though so at least there is that.
As for standing... I was actually half way through the cosmos missions when the anchoring change went into effect. I gave up and have no reason to even care anymore now.
|

Cara Forelli
Meticulously Indifferent
1927
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 04:18:42 -
[36] - Quote
Pandora Carrollon wrote:Ralph KG doesn't farm likes. His good mind, pithy/appropriate words, and good insight get him those likes. But mostly LAGL 
Confirming he's a good dude who has helped a lot of other dudes get in to the game, despite CCP repeatedly nerfing his play style to the point of inviability.
He's a much better man than I. I'm too bitter for NCQA now so I've been reduced to responding to (read as: legitimizing) turds like the OP in GD while eager newbros go unhelped.
#thanksCCP
Want to talk? Join my channel in game: House Forelli
Titan's Lament
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Devils Rejects 666 The Devil's Warrior Alliance
16801
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 11:26:28 -
[37] - Quote
Cara Forelli wrote:But mostly LAGL  i will hurt you if i can find you.
Better the Devil you know.
=]|[=
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
26310
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 13:14:13 -
[38] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Cara Forelli wrote:But mostly LAGL  i will hurt you if i can find you. /me cues up Yakety Sax on the playlist.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|

Daerrol
Death By Design Did he say Jump
308
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 15:00:03 -
[39] - Quote
Hi I'm a pirate main. Sec Status has this effect on my life: 1. PVPing none-low sec status people is a tiny bit harder as they get gate guns I don't 2. I had to pay CCP some money to train up a hauling alt as I didn't wanna lose the training time myself 3. My hauling skills on my main are kinda going to waste 4. Going to null can be scary as I have to jump through highsec and the nullbears camp the gate and tackle us on the way back home (BAD GAMEPLAY)
Suggestions to make the Sec Status thingymajiggy work better: Remove Sec Status all together. Everyone w/o suspect/criminal timer gets gate gun defense in lowsec. Some Characters can go back to higshec. Gankers catalyst alts can go do other stuff (still can't undock for 10 minutes after a gank as criminal timer is in effect) |

Pandora Carrollon
Kingsman Tailors
431
|
Posted - 2016.07.12 22:41:38 -
[40] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:i will hurt you if i can find you.
Give me a shout and I'll try to make it a fair fight, otherwise, I feel sorry for my poor PvE ship!  
Be Positive GÇó Change yourself first, New Eden will come later GÇó EVE is Awesome GÇó CCP isn't the enemy GÇó Players are people too GÇó Where're the clothing blueprints GÇó Yeah, I'm still learning this game
-- Pandora's Rules to EVE by
|
|

Dornier Pfeil
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2016.08.24 21:23:06 -
[41] - Quote
W33b3l wrote:Although I've always felt that loosing sec status in lowsec (other then podding) is kind of stupid because theres not any authorities out there to see it happen.
It's the shared Jove technology. Capsuleers and Concord are both products of the same technology and therefore part of the same communications network/security grid. It ties us all together and allows Concord to know when and where aggression occurs. |

Dornier Pfeil
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2016.08.24 21:25:45 -
[42] - Quote
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:Most people have answered the questions posed already but Ill add my two cents. Way back in the day you could go up to +10 standing as well as -10. But it was so easy to go into null and rat for a single day or two to get the standings back from -10 that CCP changed it to +5 and made rats count less to standings. Like others alluded to you could get positive standings for factions only so you could be +10 with all factions and have had the +10 standings with concord as well with all the enviable results. Reprocessing in stations was perfect at 6.66 corp standing status, POSs before the changes needed 8.0 standings to anchor in a 0.8 system, 7.0 for 0.7, etc and of course agents needed the required faction standings. These were all tied into concord standings as one and the same but again CCP took those and divided the two. Btw if you have low Concord standings avoid the Concord systems as they will do the same if you are KOS as if you committed a criminal act anywhere. The sec status gains above 5.0 were still implemented last time I checked and there are two missions you can do ONCE in your eve career, like the COSMOS agents, that will reward you with that above 5.0 standings. Afaik you dont get anything other than the epeen badge of ultimate carebearism though. And if you lose that sec you will never get it back. CCP has removed sec status and standings and their importance over the years and there is little to no reason to care anymore other than a slightly different playstyle. I like W33bl3's idea quite frankly to make it be a thing again. But the crying from the ganker crowd will put a sock in that fast. I also think that low sec needs to have way less of a standings hit for ships but not pods, but again I think this will fall on deaf ears. I used to consider my sec status as a commodity that if not used was worthless. So I would go about until I was close to 5.0 and then go gank. You could get in about 6 or so ganks before you got near 0.0 again and then go on with your life. This changed when crimewatch came into effect as now you could sell your killrights. Before that knowing your target wouldnt ever come find you was most beneficial in selecting gank targets. But now they can sell your killright so its not as beneficial a commodity in the same way. But now of course theres so much isk having your own dedicated -10 gank alt is more a thing.... or having 2, 5 or 10 like some people out there do. I would love to see it BE a commodity much like tags for sec. Have those with high sec extract and sell tags to those with low sec for isk as well. Or at least something. ANYTHING is better than what it is now. I used to matter and Id love to see stuff matter again. But I think like real life its just imaginary. There is NO beneficial reason to have a higher sec status and it is a shame on CCPs part. But with so many of the player base crying about "REAL" issues that need fixing Im sure something like sec status and standings are likely on the **** pile of the totem pole over there far off to the left, no no way on back there over those mountain ranges, nope dont stop... clear across that ocean... yeaaah riiight about there.  So no I dont believe CCP will change it anytime soon besides making it easier for the masses like the anchoring POSs issue in high sec to cave to the nullbears thatd have to run missions!! OMG!!  in high sec?!?!  to get THAT much standings  to put up a POS like the rest of the player base did so you can put up those compression arrays everywhere. But dedicated toons for ganking or whatever are just as common as dedicated mission runners, incursion runners or anom running. Ultimately people see work and effort and scream. To think in a game billed as deep and long term is too much most often. Hand it to me on a silver platter or let me just shoot them like fish in a barrel is more "fun" but sinks to the least common denominator factor. Wow... yeah...that went way too long and kinda rantish at the end. LOL So Ill stop there now..... for now.  no, no Ill never let you all off that easy. 
Thank you for this answer. I asked this question in another thread but I just guessed it wasn't worth answering.
|

Solecist Project
32427
|
Posted - 2016.08.24 21:35:34 -
[43] - Quote
There should be a benefit in having a positive security status.
Like, no CONCORD spawning when i kill someone.
Why is this discussion even there?
What is wrong with you monster???
You slaughter MILLIONS OF LIVES every single week in the name of agents of the empires ... ... you enforce CONCORD's law upon fathers, mothers, sisters and brothers ... ... and now you even ask to be honoured???
HONOURED???
A mass murderer are you! And you're also a COWARD for shooting those who are much, much weaker!!
That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breathe of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly PULVERISED by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds. - Tippia
8 Golden Rules of EVE
|

Khan Wrenth
Ore Oppression Prevention and Salvation
659
|
Posted - 2016.08.25 01:00:30 -
[44] - Quote
W33b3l wrote:I personally wish your sec status effected concord response time if you where attacked. Zero being default, the closer to 5 you are the quicker they respond ( based off the security of the system) and the closer you are to -5 (or the magic number that makes you a criminal) the slower they respond. That would be kind of cool.
Actually I wish the opposite.
I wish the more security status you had, the longer it took for Concord to react when you yourself commit a criminal act.
Let's discuss overhauling the way we get intel in EvE.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |