|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
634
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 10:58:26 -
[1] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:Statistic here says this alliance gained about 30 trillions of isks and lost about 1 trillion isks ... How do you calculate that they gained about 30 trillion?
Their entire among destroyed is 33.6 trillion. |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
634
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 11:04:12 -
[2] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:Actually I've asked the game developer.
I've given a look to all the top pvp alliances and ratios are different, much lower ratios and much much lower solo pvp.
Doing some factional warfare myself on another character I perfectly know how hard is solo pvp and how rare are solo pvpers.
So this so different statistic made me very curious. But your understanding of that statistic seems a bit off, if by "gained 30 trillion ISK" you mean that this is an increase in their wallet. It isn't. |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
634
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 11:11:32 -
[3] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Lucy Lollipops wrote:Actually I've asked the game developer.
I've given a look to all the top pvp alliances and ratios are different, much lower ratios and much much lower solo pvp.
Doing some factional warfare myself on another character I perfectly know how hard is solo pvp and how rare are solo pvpers.
So this so different statistic made me very curious. But your understanding of that statistic seems a bit off, if by "gained 30 trillion ISK" you mean that this is an increase in their wallet. It isn't. mmm ok I was not referring to any wallet. I was referring to ratios/solo compared to other top pvp alliances. A game developer that did pvp can surely tell me why they are so much better than others on the statistics I think. They are successful in destroying large amounts of ISK because people in highsec carry valuable cargo in under tanked and under supported haulers and/or under tanked, expensive ships.
They target high value kills and find plenty of them because people make choices to provide them with a lot of suitable targets.
In other areas of space (and other people in highsec too) are more careful with the risk they expose themselves to. |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
634
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 11:36:49 -
[4] - Quote
Is it a full moon at the moment?
Conspiracy theories now? |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
634
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 11:46:31 -
[5] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:Honestly think many answers are off-topic here.
I simply asked about the reasons of a so amazing ratio of 1:30 compared to other very different ratios for the other top pvp alliances, in particular seeing about a wonderful 74% of solo kills ( I'm studying fittings of FW players and the best solo ratios I find are about 40% and with not comparable ratios at all). FW is not highsec ganking.
You aren't going to get anywhere near 30:1 ISK ratios in lowsec. Everyone is there to fight and use far less valuable ships than people risk in highsec. |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
635
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 12:18:02 -
[6] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:I'm not receiving any answer from the developer, I saw him posting so I hoped for an answer. The forum isn't a personal messaging service to CCP employees, nor is CCP Falcon the only person who can answer the question you asked.
There are several correct answers in the thread already. |
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
636
|
Posted - 2016.07.26 12:41:12 -
[7] - Quote
Lucy Lollipops wrote:You all are telling me:
- This alliance plays in almost exclusively High Security
- They can use a 10 mil ship to kill a 280 mil ship easily
- They can decide targets and kill them with no risks and no problem.
Statistic says:
- They killed about 30 trillions of ships and lost about 1 trillion of ships value.
- They did it with a 74% or solo ratio.
I think all of this deserves an answer from a Developer, if Falcon or not it's the same, I've read he was a pirate so I suppose he knows the reasons better than anyone else ( maybe he was in that alliance too, I really don't know). You're just fishing for a comment to confirm your own bias, or to be outraged over.
The efficiency of CODE isn't achieved alone. It requires people to do stupid things. Unfortunately, lots of people do those stupid things, so really they get the consequence they walk into. Those people are every bit as involved in CODE's success as CODE is. |
|
|
|