| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Phaethon
   |
Posted - 2004.04.08 18:35:00 -
[91]
Those small numbers at the bottom of the main mission forum, right after "Pages" is what you need. It can't be more than a few pages back.
Give it a little effort.
WTB. Infifitrator I drones |
Bad Harlequin
|
Posted - 2004.04.08 21:09:00 -
[92]
Your silliness has been noted, but that would require reading every darn thread or at least knowing the name of the topic :P. Anyone know what it was called?
papa, are there still ANY plans, short- medium- long- or Soon-range, to use missions as a means of triggering / taking part in Events and/or affecting (however slightly) some part of the environment? Or to have (wide scope) opposing missions with opposite affects across regions?
You are in a maze of twisty little asteroids, all alike. |
Athule Snanm
|
Posted - 2004.04.13 13:14:00 -
[93]
 Quote:
papa, are there still ANY plans, short- medium- long- or Soon-range, to use missions as a means of triggering / taking part in Events and/or affecting (however slightly) some part of the environment? Or to have (wide scope) opposing missions with opposite affects across regions?
I do hope this happens, whilst it wouldn't be very good if events were limited to people running missions there's certainly a good case for some of them being linked to missions/standings. For example a list of the people with the biggest standing gain for a corp that week could be forwarded to the events people and then they'd be contacted by evemail that an event would be happening (in an IC manner of course).
_______________________________
Doomheim - EVE's only hygiene! |
Phaethon
|
Posted - 2004.04.25 16:49:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Phaethon on 13/05/2004 23:55:34
Originally by: Bad Harlequin
Your silliness has been noted, but that would require reading every darn thread or at least knowing the name of the topic :P. Anyone know what it was called?
What skills are delivering tech II bps?
now was that sooo hard that you had to read every single post on the forums? :)
btw there is a similar thread about
implants n corps
And one about the values of components
And one about missions rats
and another about mission rats
and even an IGB compatible searchable database about rats
A good list with all pirates, their names, bounty's AND links to eve-db about each rat
And one about Research Points pr day
And finally some Whine n Dine
All within the last 10 pages, all easy to identify by their subject.
WTB. Infifitrator I drones |
Amexx
|
Posted - 2004.05.18 21:56:00 -
[95]
from Papa: "The only other criteria that may burn you is that the mission requires a courier destination in a station in a neighboring constellation. If there exists at least one station in a solar system in a neighboring constellation which has a security rating similar to that of your agent's, you're safe on that one."
What does this exactly mean? my agent is in 0.8 system. Nearby system is 0.9. Is this good enough?? |
Phaethon
|
Posted - 2004.05.31 01:21:00 -
[96]
Iirr agents send you to destinations with a sec status of +/- 0,25 of that of their own system
If that is what Papa is referring to there however, I cannot say for sure.
WTB. Infifitrator I drones |
Sherkaner
|
Posted - 2004.06.10 07:18:00 -
[97]
Unsticky'd, since a lot of the info in here is outdated and/or confusing 
|
Liet Traep
|
Posted - 2005.05.03 20:01:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Hamaroubo
I got a question for ya all...
my playtimes have changed alot so there isnt much ppl in my corp online when i play, thus im looking for doing agent missions.
The thing is, I dont wanna go back down to empire...
So i have aprox -3.7 personal and corp standing against my local npc pirate corp, can i do missions for them?
Just started to train that criminal connections skill... with lvl 1 on it i get -3,13 effectiv standing.. 
So I wonder, is there any chance that ill be able to do missions for them?
I spent a couple of months killing sansha but I was able with my criminal connections 2 skill to agent run for them.
|
capt
|
Posted - 2005.05.03 20:04:00 -
[99]
reviving year old threads is not cool, mmmmmkaaaayyy.
|
Sherkaner
|
Posted - 2005.05.03 20:29:00 -
[100]
Originally by: capt
reviving year old threads is not cool, mmmmmkaaaayyy.
Commenting on the revival of year old threads is totally unnecessary, mmmmmkaaaayyy.
Rest in piece, old thread. 
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |