| Author | 
        Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
      
          
          Jerick Ludhowe 
          Mongoloids Inc.
  28
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2011.12.25 13:25:00 -
          [1] - Quote 
          
           
          TrueGrits Chris wrote:Who else thinks this would be a good add on to the game faction battlecruiser. I love to see a fleet issue hurricane or navy issue drake   
  I got a way better idea... How about we un-break command ships before we introduce tier 2 faction bcs that will obviously have 1 or 2 more slots, more ehp, and 3 rigs...
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Jerick Ludhowe 
          Mongoloids Inc.
  28
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2011.12.25 13:31:00 -
          [2] - Quote 
          
           
          RougeOperator wrote:Soon Shin wrote:Navy Battlecruisers concerns me in that it would be equal or superior to field command ships. Command ships need buffing for the costs and the skill prerequisite needed to fly them. 
  Either Navy Battlecruisers have to be gimped, or Tech 2 Field Command Ships need to be buffed.   Command ships use Command links.  navy ships would not step on the toes of their role. Tech 3 cruisers already did that.  making navy BCs would be no different then what we have now in terms of Navy cruisers vs HACs etc.   
  Field commands have the same bonuses to fitting command links as t1 bcs and I don't see everyone posting "Bcs are meant to fit Command links". Just like t1 bcs, fitting a command link to a field command often gimps them into the underwhelming category.
  If you want to work with gang links fit a specialized off grid bc, fleet command, or t3 please...
  Learn to fit field commands first before posting such a pigeonholed arguments.
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Jerick Ludhowe 
          Mongoloids Inc.
  28
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2011.12.25 20:45:00 -
          [3] - Quote 
          
           
          Soon Shin wrote:The absolution should be given another gun since the sleipnir has one more turret and bigger drone bay than the hurricane, while the absolution has one less turret and smaller drone bay. The absolution should be given more grid and cpu to accomodate the 7th turret. 
  The nighthawk deserves another missile, I don't see a reason why it has less missiles than the drake. 7 heavy missiles will make the nighthawk worth using, it also needs a bit more grid and cpu. 
   
  I like these idea more or less.
  Abso with +1 high and another turret +fittings would allow for it to compete with legions for medium laser dps king.
  Imo Nighthawk should get +1 mid and have the kinetic bonus changed to a flat damage bonus allowing it to compete with it's tier 2 cousin. Currently the drake is more or less superior to the NH outside of specific situations where the beast kin/therm resistance shines. For those that do no know, the drake has 1 more total slot as well as an additional rig when compared to the Nighthawk, you know the command ship with an 8x Multiplier skill?.....
  I'd like to see the Astarte get an additional low as well...
  | 
      
      
        |   | 
          |