| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
23
   |
Posted - 2011.12.21 23:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Systematic Oppression wrote:For those of you who think women can't be soldiers and particularly ground combat soldiers, I'd like to direct you to this historical example. Miss Pavlichenko She was one of the most successful snipers in history and by extension one of history's greatest soldiers.
Yes snipers are known to be a lttile 'limp wristed' all that playing with there 'scope' most likely. Hardley reinforces your idea females make good front line troops. They just aren't physically strong enough to carry the immense weight of equipment and perform to the physical abilties a man can achieve..
Sorry to break the bad news to you..
I'm sure it will not divert your path of 'feminism' failing to appreciate and aknowledge the beauty and varaiance between the sexes.
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
24
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 00:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Systematic Oppression wrote:It's great to see all the homophobes, misogynists and bigoted evospsych assholes come right out of the woodwork in these here forums. Snipers being "limp wristed"? Do you actually read the garbage you spew before you post or are you just a bad troll that thinks misogyny is funny. Yeah, in our natural un-augmented states, women have less overall muscle mass. Given that in most combat cases people aren't massacring each other with melee weapons now or in the eve universe I scarcely see the relevance.
Not melee weapons no, but taking conastant kick from an automatic weapon, while carying enough that it would make an average man weak, plus satying highly mobile is no easy physical task.
Call me what you will, the facts of biology won't comply to your anger.
Woman sacrifice much of there physical abilties to be able to achieve the miracle of childbirth, a biological entity has a 'hard cap' on what it can achieve.
Interesting as pointed out with rangers piloting comment, females of the species (while being more deadly than the male obviously  ) are also diffrent intellectually. They have a more 'broad spectrum' of awarness, and could see how that would be an advantage in 'tactical' combat situation, including naval technical staff.
And finally woman are diffent emotinally as well, 'hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" (see also earlier 'woman are more deadly ... etc.') , they either love you or hate you.
Perhaps you could come up with a nice title to stereotype my attitude with.
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
24
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 00:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
ninjaholic wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:So... you'd rather have a guy watching your ass? Dood, you're in Narnia if that's what you read.
Well you know people read what they want to read into things don't they 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 08:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Don't know if powered armour really works as an explanation for me, a suit that allowed you too lift an extra 500 lbs would still be better operated by someone basically stronger.
Don't know why we are argueing the point though this is 'science fiction' we are talking about which mix of the two is prferable to you is an entirely subjective thing.
My suggestion would be clones are grown neutered, and the extra potential cell growth saved in not having to produce reproductive organs is channeled into skeletal and muscular growth. Accounting for a levelling in the playing field.
I've no objections to seeing female avatars I just believe it's a slightly diffrent ballgame IRL.
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
29
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 10:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Logan LaMort wrote:Professor Alphane wrote:Don't know if powered armour really works as an explanation for me, a suit that allowed you too lift an extra 500 lbs would still be better operated by someone basically stronger. I disagree, the whole point of a powered exoskeleton is to give you that strength, it basically makes everything you pick up light as a feather. What you really need is endurance, to be able to keep on moving over and over again. It's definitely not science fiction.
I'd disagree, to my mind the exoskelton is what allows allows you to carry the 1000lbs armour plating , and the 250lb rifle, doesn't nesacarily mean it's going to feel 'light as a feather' cos if it did they'd likely bolt more bits on to maximise it's potential.
Just my thoughts on the matter.
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.22 22:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Systematic Oppression wrote:Professor Alphane wrote:
I'd disagree, to my mind the exoskelton is what allows allows you to carry the 1000lbs armour plating , and the 250lb rifle, doesn't nesacarily mean it's going to feel 'light as a feather' cos if it did they'd likely bolt more bits on to maximise it's potential.
Just my thoughts on the matter.
Yes, but you've already established yourself as an idiot and bigot earlier in this thread so you're lack of understanding in regards to anything is understandable.
Perhaps you should read my posts more clearly before labeling me.
Please feel free to quotes what you feel are 'idiotic' and 'bigoted' comments perhaps I could give you some insight into there context. So far we have discussed many thing's including 'roles where woman would be more valuable the men' ' The physical and psychological diffrence between the sexes' ' Our theories on how power armor really works' (well OK I might give you that one , that is a little idiotic).
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |
| |
|