| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Helel Lightbringer
Freelancing Corp
Confederation of Independent Corporations
   |
Posted - 2007.03.18 01:18:00 -
[1]
So I am planning on removing my second armor repper for mission running after the stacking penalty goes in. What would you say for maximum tanking after the nerf goes in? I am thinking one repper, 4 hardeners (or 3 and an EANM for mercs and such), a DC and a 1600 plate. Thoughts?
*****
"It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma." -- Winston Churchill |
Vaine Amarr
Amarr
Upright Citizens Brigade
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 01:36:00 -
[2]
You seem to be another one of the many that completely mistook the patch notes. There will be no stacking penalty to armor reppers themselves, but the rigs that affect repping amount/cycle time.
__________________________
It's great beeing Amarr, ain't it? |
Helel Lightbringer
Freelancing Corp
Confederation of Independent Corporations
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 01:46:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Vaine Amarr
You seem to be another one of the many that completely mistook the patch notes. There will be no stacking penalty to armor reppers themselves, but the rigs that affect repping amount/cycle time.
Yep, I would be one of those people alright. Thanks for clarifying the patch changes for me. 
*****
"It is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma." -- Winston Churchill |
dalman
Finite Horizon
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 01:50:00 -
[4]
Are you fitting one laser, one hybrid, one projectile and one missile launcher on your ships as well?
Since damagemods and ROF have a stacking penalty?
/me is about to go insane about how 265340624 persons on this forum doesn't understand the patch notes.
Am I forced to have any regret?
I've become the lie, beautiful and free
In my righteous own mind
I adore and preach the insanity you gave to me |
Vaine Amarr
Amarr
Upright Citizens Brigade
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 01:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: dalman
Are you fitting one laser, one hybrid, one projectile and one missile launcher on your ships as well?
Since damagemods and ROF have a stacking penalty?
/me is about to go insane about how 265340624 persons on this forum doesn't understand the patch notes.
__________________________
It's great beeing Amarr, ain't it? |
Xori Ruscuv
Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 03:18:00 -
[6]
Originally by: dalman
Edited by: dalman on 18/03/2007 02:04:03
Are you fitting one laser, one hybrid, one projectile and one missile launcher on your ships as well?
Since damagemods and ROF have a stacking penalty?
/me is about to go insane about how 265340624 persons on this forum doesn't understand the patch notes.
*edit* - hope that wasn't too harsch on you (and as said you're certainly not alone), but that is actually the same thing.
Heh. It is an easy mistake to make. It would have not been made if someone knew how to write proper patch notes. *whistles* 
Passive shield tank is the new WCS! |
Rathroc
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 04:22:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Vaine Amarr
You seem to be another one of the many that completely mistook the patch notes. There will be no stacking penalty to armor reppers themselves, but the rigs that affect repping amount/cycle time.
Would have been nice if they had put the armor rig stacking penalty under oh... I don't know... THE RIG CATAGORY? I mean honestly, if they aren't touching multiple armor reps then what inspired them to put it under the modules catagory?
I'm curious if it wasn't a half-arsed attempt to pull a fast one on us armor tankers.
|
Imechal Ravpeim
International Multi-Player Consortium
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 04:28:00 -
[8]
Why is everybody getting so ****ed off? It was one TINY mistake(more like a misunderstanding, I understood the patchnotes fine...) compared to all these GREAT fixes.
INVENTABLE HULKS! Why the hell are you people still *****ING!!!? (hulk bpo owners dont count <_<)
|
Ryo Jang
Central Defiance
|
Posted - 2007.03.18 07:34:00 -
[9]
because it causes great panic!
------------------------------------
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |