| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thira Rans
   |
Posted - 2007.04.02 13:53:00 -
[31]
Additionally to the poor loot the danger of loosing something is much to high.
For examples this Serpentis Annex. You guys say this is harder than 10/10. I live
in low sec with the most diffucult static complex is a 5/10. However I find this
Serpentis Annex in 0.4, do the first stage, do the second stage and get
insta popped (due to lag) as I start shooting the smuggler gate.
So I cannot judge the difficulty of the complex before doing it. This implies that
you WILL lose ships when you explore these sites (sooner or later) AND i get less
rewards than doing the 5/10????
|
Chalion
|
Posted - 2007.04.03 03:02:00 -
[32]
With the exception of rat droppings, the overseerers effects from a 5/10 are worth a hell of a lot more then what we found, and what most are finding. Look CCP, all these peopling ignoring part of your game because it isn't working properly. Still no response, I still battle Customer Service regarding this issue. I will until I get a respectful, meaningful response from someone who can make a difference. I urge more people to come forth and post your stories of being ripped off, wasting time, losing ships, getting civilian loot from these abominations!
|
TopeZone Waters
|
Posted - 2007.04.03 17:09:00 -
[33]
1: CCP wont reply to this because they are embarassed they once again smoked one too many doobies.
2: Don't bother expecting anything for good loot, just run the first part to clear the exploration site and allow another to spawn somewhere nearby.
DON'T feed CCP with the satisfaction they got us to do these insanely stupid plexes... make them realize none of us are doing them when they see we dont do any past the first stage.
Nothing worse then putting something in game only to have the players laugh at you and never touch it.
The Dev's are idiots, this is a proven fact. Just explore and clear the probe hit and move on. Make them come back with a big notice saying they fixed their screw up and now drop proportional loot in escalation plexes.
------------------------------------------------
Just because it has wings does not mean it can fly or was even meant to in the first place. Whatch that first step, its a doozy |
Chalion
|
Posted - 2007.04.03 21:45:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Chalion on 03/04/2007 21:42:04
 Originally by: TopeZone Waters
1: CCP wont reply to this because they are embarassed they once again smoked one too many doobies.
2: Don't bother expecting anything for good loot, just run the first part to clear the exploration site and allow another to spawn somewhere nearby.
DON'T feed CCP with the satisfaction they got us to do these insanely stupid plexes... make them realize none of us are doing them when they see we dont do any past the first stage.
Nothing worse then putting something in game only to have the players laugh at you and never touch it.
The Dev's are idiots, this is a proven fact. Just explore and clear the probe hit and move on. Make them come back with a big notice saying they fixed their screw up and now drop proportional loot in escalation plexes.
Thats the type of attitude that has gotten us where we are now. The same attitude that lets GM's and Dev's think they can get away with anything they want ingame and with features.
We need to voice our concerns and demand parts of the game that are not working to be fixed. Fill out petitions, escalate the petition etc. You wouldn't continue paying for cable TV with the premium channels and accept only getting the standard would you ? Yes its great that CCP takes interest in it's creation and adds new content, don't ever get me wrong, I love the new content, but dont half ass it on us.
|
Chalion
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 17:23:00 -
[35]
I see the problem would rather be ignored then addressed by the majority of people. I can only assume that they are ignoring the complexes entirerly instead of asking for reform. My escelated petition still stands unanswered, must be swamped with petty ship lose problems.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |