| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
48
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 09:17:56 -
[1] - Quote
So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)
Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.
So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.
Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.
Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets. For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.
However for an alpha, that's disposable. It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:
war-decs = Create new account kill-rights = Create new account -10 standings = Create new account The list go's on and on
I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up -ú50+ to take it with me
An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.
It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.
And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)
Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.
TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

TheVirus32
Trois Etoiles The Volition Cult
35
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 09:32:47 -
[2] - Quote
only future will tell :/, but you do make a point. |

Erebus Vain
State War Academy Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 10:54:17 -
[3] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)
Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.
So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.
Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.
Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets. For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.
However for an alpha, that's disposable. It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:
war-decs = Create new account kill-rights = Create new account -10 standings = Create new account The list go's on and on
I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up -ú50+ to take it with me
An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.
It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.
And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)
Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.
TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing.
This an interesting idea of how it "could" go. Abused mechanics (mostly) get changed by CCP once they are a hindrance to the overall development of the game though.
good to think of these things, but making your own thread and not just adding this into the official thread means i expect this to be locked.
good thoughts, wrong place.
|

Geronimo McVain
EVE University Ivy League
208
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 10:57:48 -
[4] - Quote
Try doing bad things with a new toon. Alphas can't extract so you loose ALL your SP. IMHO if someone is up to mischief and cares enough to figure it out how to he will most likely sub to do more. Your possibilities as an alpha are rather limited. |

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
49
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 11:17:19 -
[5] - Quote
Erebus Vain wrote:bardghost Isu wrote:So it occurred to me earlier some of the potential dangers that come with alpha accounts and a lack of consequences for them when something bad happens. (Might I remind people that consequences are a vital part of this game)
Don't get me wrong I'm not against alpha's being introduced, But it needs to be done correctly. It has the potential to lose CCP a fair few subscribers who will probably earn them more than any alpha could.
So my point is simple for those of us who subscribe if we do bad thing intentionally or accidentally it sticks, you earn a reputation.
Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Awesome FC, Alliance leader, Funder of major wars - With that you do you earn a reputation, Good or bad. That sticks.
Okay you could create a new account, but you lose some of your SP (Not as much as you used to due to injectors),Standings with empires, you may lose assets. For a lot of people its a fair bit of stuff to lose. Plus the RL cash you have invested into the account And if you want to take skills with you, then be prepared to stump up cash to do so.
However for an alpha, that's disposable. It opens up ways for people to come in do anything they want from the list of actions that can get you a bad reputation and simply create a new account for free and lose very little SP. There is no consequence to the person using the alpha. It could result in:
war-decs = Create new account kill-rights = Create new account -10 standings = Create new account The list go's on and on
I understand that any of us who subscribe could do that, But it'd be a lot to lose for us I'm not prepared to lose 40+ mil SP, and even less prepared to stump up -ú50+ to take it with me
An alpha doesn't have that to worry about, they cant extract skills anyway, so just create a skill plan and start again, be done within 15 days.. Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved.
It seems too abusable for people and could only serve to damage the community in the long run. I'm also fully expecting to see people creating disposable accounts just to be throwing around, Sexist, Homophobic, racist, Etc... references anywhere is space.
And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries)
Apologies for a wall of text but I feel it needs to be said, And not in a thread that it'll be lost in just to keep people quiet.
TL'DR As subscribers we have things to lose if we want to do bad things on our accounts, An alpha won't they can just create a new account if anything goes wrong and lose next to nothing. This an interesting idea of how it "could" go. Abused mechanics (mostly) get changed by CCP once they are a hindrance to the overall development of the game though. good to think of these things, but making your own thread and not just adding this into the official thread means i expect this to be locked. good thoughts, wrong place.
I expect it to be locked too. However it would be hidden in amongst loads of comments in the other thread and barely acknowledged. Here people can be made aware of the situation, If it gets locked then I'll take it as they don't care about feedback.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
49
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 11:20:47 -
[6] - Quote
Geronimo McVain wrote:Try doing bad things with a new toon. Alphas can't extract so you loose ALL your SP. IMHO if someone is up to mischief and cares enough to figure it out how to he will most likely sub to do more. Your possibilities as an alpha are rather limited.
Yes, I know they cant extract, but they are locked at 5 mil cap.
I'd rather lose a few 5 mil sp accounts that are free than tarnish a 40+ mil sp account that I'd have to:
A) Lose all the 40+ mil sp for a new character B) Pay -ú50+ to transfer the sp across
5 Mil SP is next to nothing when you can create an account for free and have one training whilst you use the other and keep chaining it every month.
That's not something I could do with my account. the closest I can come is a trail account, and they are time limited so wiping away training one whilst using another.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

Yarosara Ruil
622
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 11:40:10 -
[7] - Quote
Here's the thing. Nothing what so ever stops a person from starting hundreds throwaway Alpha accounts with Gallentean characters in them, set them to train every skill allowed to an Alpha to excel at Catalysts and just wait the 2 months or so it takes for them to train up.
After that it is just a matter of biomassing the characters and cycle through them so the ganker has always a new character with fresh standings to gank with at zero cost. There's not even an ISK cost involved since it takes them about thirty minutes doing opportunities and career missions to get everything they need.
|

Cristl
488
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 11:41:44 -
[8] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Your choice of 'baddies' only really has one profession (pirate) that requires more than a trial alt's worth of SP anyway. And I'm not sure how that could be abused either.
I'd be more concerned about faction warfare alts which don't have to care about standings, since you can have an army in each militia. |

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
8022
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 12:30:10 -
[9] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:Anyone dedicated to cause trouble could just create 2 accounts at a time so they have a backup for when one has to be disposed of, then setup another whilst using the spare. Bang problem solved. This is the bit that mainly concerns me. Being able to just cycle alts by training one and playing the other then adding new ones each time you chuck and old one out.
bardghost Isu wrote:And before people suggest doing IP bans to people that to that, All I would have to do is call my ISP to get my IP changed. (Might be different in other countries) All I have to do is change the MAC address setting on my router and it gives me a new IP address. Many ISPs actually have dynamic IPs but you reserve the one you're on for a short time and the internet is always connected so it looks static. Change the MAC connecting to it and you don't get the reservation anymore so you get a new IP. There's other ways to ban people, using machinekeys and the like, but none are foolproof.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|

Geronimo McVain
EVE University Ivy League
209
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 13:37:20 -
[10] - Quote
There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it... |

Keebler Wizard
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
29
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 13:47:29 -
[11] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:I expect it to be locked too. However it would be hidden in amongst loads of comments in the other thread and barely acknowledged. Here people can be made aware of the situation, If it gets locked then I'll take it as they don't care about feedback.
Because you're analysis is so important and so original, it deserves its own thread.
/sarcasm. |

Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony
793
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:18:08 -
[12] - Quote
While I agree with OP, that probably also reinforces the 15 mil SP minimum or GTFO rule. Some alliances even call for 50 mil SP.
It is quite possible we'll see Alpha-only corp rise. |

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:36:47 -
[13] - Quote
Cristl wrote:bardghost Isu wrote:Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Your choice of 'baddies' only really has one profession (pirate) that requires more than a trial alt's worth of SP anyway. And I'm not sure how that could be abused either. I'd be more concerned about faction warfare alts which don't have to care about standings, since you can have an army in each militia.
Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's not all too great. Its easier to avoid that reputation if your an alpha as it can just be cycled account after account.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:38:26 -
[14] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:While I agree with OP, that probably also reinforces the 15 mil SP minimum or GTFO rule. Some alliances even call for 50 mil SP.
It is quite possible we'll see Alpha-only corp rise.
In all honesty I've considered forming my own corp of alpha's and seeing what can be done with the numbers that could be offered by them.
Don't get me wrong, this could be a good change for the game. But ONLY if it is done correctly, If its done wrong then its going to get bad and quickly.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:42:04 -
[15] - Quote
Geronimo McVain wrote:There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it...
I know what you mean, However you can currently create unlimited trial accounts on one email and I doubt anything will change there.
And with regards to limiting only 1 alpha online, People have already figured ways around it using virtual machines. Not everyone will do that. But my point here isn't about multiboxing, its about unlimited throwaway accounts that can be lost and not bothered about. The minute I deem one to be having too bad a reputation then I just throw the account, use the standby character, then setup a new one to train whilst that one is being used.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 14:45:25 -
[16] - Quote
Yarosara Ruil wrote:Here's the thing. Nothing what so ever stops a person from starting hundreds throwaway Alpha accounts with Gallentean characters in them, set them to train every skill allowed to an Alpha to excel at Catalysts and just wait the 2 months or so it takes for them to train up.
After that it is just a matter of biomassing the characters and cycle through them so the ganker has always a new character with fresh standings to gank with at zero cost. There's not even an ISK cost involved since it takes them about thirty minutes doing opportunities and career missions to get everything they need.
Yes, that's an issue. A lack of consequences for actions.
My mind-set may be different to some but for me.
Paid account = Something I have invested time and effort into and I wouldn't want to do anything that can ruin future play-types I may want to do.
Free account = Bah, no cash spent on it so screw it, I can just make another one if it goes wrong.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
8024
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 15:56:50 -
[17] - Quote
Geronimo McVain wrote:There is still the problem what you can achiev with an Alpha char. CCP is most likely limiting the amount of Alphas to one and only the Alpha can go online, nothing else. That's IMHO the main reason for the launcher changes. A Alpha with just T1 weapons will not pose a threat even to a hulk. Someone calculated that you will need to double the gankers with Alpha which will double the costs (ships, weapons etc.) and so ganking with Alphas will not make big money. And you Need a lot people because no multiboxing. You may play around with virtual machines but if it's worth it... You can get a good 4-5 T1 gank cats for the price of a T2. You'd certainly be able to do it cheaper with multiple T1s than with a T2. People will multibox them regardless of whether or not there are limitations, just like people multibox trials, trials however have a limited time before you have to pay, alphas won't.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.
Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
|

Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1241
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 16:02:54 -
[18] - Quote
I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are.
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|

Chopper Rollins
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1591
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 16:06:36 -
[19] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote: Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's FREAKIN AWESOME!.
Seriously, your idea of a bad reputation is different from mine. Now i know some of us like to crouch backwards into the future in a permanently defensive posture, cringing from even the threat of one of life's slaps or stings, but you have the option to DROP TROU and sprint merrily into the fire waving a hatchet. I mean the choice is yours.
The amount of evil one of these alphas could get up to isn't worth hiding from. Cycling catalyst derps to pick at hisec warts is lame, like most things that happen in hisec, lame and paltry.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.
|

KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
400
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 16:49:18 -
[20] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:Cristl wrote:[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ...... Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > ..... Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited. Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account?
You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality.
Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in.
KB
Dum Spiro Spero
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 17:02:13 -
[21] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:bardghost Isu wrote: Its not so much a list of baddies, Just a list of things that can get you a reputation that's FREAKIN AWESOME!.
Seriously, your idea of a bad reputation is different from mine. Now i know some of us like to crouch backwards into the future in a permanently defensive posture, cringing from even the threat of one of life's slaps or stings, but you have the option to DROP TROU and sprint merrily into the fire waving a hatchet. I mean the choice is yours. The amount of evil one of these alphas could get up to isn't worth hiding from. Cycling catalyst derps to pick at hisec warts is lame, like most things that happen in hisec, lame and paltry.
That's not how I mean bad reputation per se. Some of them to some people would be pretty cool to some people. And I'm not against alpha's being able to do them. I can deal with it,
The problem comes when there is someone out there that can do all they want to screw people over (Not a problem), but then walk away from it without any consequences because they can just roll a new FREE account. We wouldn't have that luxury as we have a lot more assets and SP to be dealing with.
Plus i'm waiting for people to keep rolling accounts and making neo-Nazi comments and such in local. This has the potential to tear a good part of the community apart, I don't want to see that.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 17:05:02 -
[22] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:bardghost Isu wrote:Cristl wrote:[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ...... Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > ..... Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited. Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account? You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality. Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in. KB
Sure people can experiment with alpha's, and I don't mind the not being chained part. Its just that there IS (Not maybe) people out there ready to abuse it.
Oh and FYI all those things put in the thread I chose not to post in, I have seen very little response to them because of the amount of comments about the change. Kind of feels to me like CCP want to drown out the negative concerns by getting all the positive ones to outweigh them.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
400
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 18:41:07 -
[23] - Quote
bardghost Isu wrote:KaarBaak wrote:bardghost Isu wrote:Cristl wrote:[quote=bardghost Isu]Known Ganker, Awoxer, Thief, Pirate, Scammer. Account > Playstyle > Bad Rep > Throw acc > New Account > Playstyle > ...... Account > Train skills > Switch to account > Play, Bad rep > Throw > Train new > ..... Hope that gets the point across, With a trial you cant do that as you are time limited. Edit: I may have originally misread your comment slightly but have amended my reply. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I kinda thought that was the point of Alphas? People can experiment with different playstyles and maybe get into a different aspect of the game? Or new players can learn what they like and what works without being [financially] chained to an account? You see a problem. I see a key component of the functionality. Abuse has been covered ad nauseum in the thread you chose not to post in. KB Sure people can experiment with alpha's, and I don't mind the not being chained part. Its just that there IS (Not maybe) people out there ready to abuse it. Oh and FYI all those things put in the thread I chose not to post in, I have seen very little response to them because of the amount of comments about the change. Kind of feels to me like CCP want to drown out the negative concerns by getting all the positive ones to outweigh them. TBH, there are people out there ready to take advantage of any change. 2% increase to cargo capacity of Falcon? Boom! Find a way to exploit it.
The Alphas are a good idea and CCP is managing it in a way to keep out 99% of the potential exploits. The remaining 1% will be patched in the days that follow or will just become a new playstyle or "content creation" method.
I realize people don't like change. Considering CCP is tries to implement change for 30,000 highly-organized min-maxers, I think they do a pretty good job managing it.
Some folks will like it. Some folks won't. Some folks will ignore it. Some folks will adapt and maybe exploit it into their playstyle.
The concerns in your OP are pretty minimal. I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about. You can stress and lose sleep over it. You can contribute to the appropriate threads in the hopes that CCP might take them into consideration (but don't be disappointed if they don't respond.) Or you can just login and go about your business, because at the end of the day this will impact individuals very very little. How much you let it impact you...well, CCP can't control that.
KB
Dum Spiro Spero
|

bardghost Isu
Unity of Suns Warped Intentions
50
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 19:33:46 -
[24] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:
TBH, there are people out there ready to take advantage of any change. 2% increase to cargo capacity of Falcon? Boom! Find a way to exploit it.
The Alphas are a good idea and CCP is managing it in a way to keep out 99% of the potential exploits. The remaining 1% will be patched in the days that follow or will just become a new playstyle or "content creation" method.
I realize people don't like change. Considering CCP is tries to implement change for 30,000 highly-organized min-maxers, I think they do a pretty good job managing it.
Some folks will like it. Some folks won't. Some folks will ignore it. Some folks will adapt and maybe exploit it into their playstyle.
The concerns in your OP are pretty minimal. I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about. You can stress and lose sleep over it. You can contribute to the appropriate threads in the hopes that CCP might take them into consideration (but don't be disappointed if they don't respond.) Or you can just login and go about your business, because at the end of the day this will impact individuals very very little. How much you let it impact you...well, CCP can't control that.
KB
I know what you mean, I hope it is done right. This was just a realisation me and a few alliance buddies had. Yeah I'm probably thinking too much of it. But at the end of the day I want to see this done right, Because a lot of us fear it being done wrong and driving away some of the decent people who play the game. Only for them to be replaced by douchebags and those out to ruin a great community. I think that's probably my main fear with the alpha aspect, I've seen F2P communities before they're not good.
A few weeks ago I was in a game on LOL and something kept throwing out Neo-Nazi comments, I'd already had 3 games of it. Reports felt like they were doing crap but its the best you can do. In that case I just quit and decided I'd rather take a 2 week suspension for leaving matches rather than put up with that kind of crap.
That's what I see people doing here if that kind of language takes mainstream hold, but they won't come back
Yeah sure there are already alliances out there pushing it, but its not there at every turn, its not in your face every moment of play.
There's No Kill Like Overkill !
|

Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
579
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 21:46:41 -
[25] - Quote
I think this is gonna be totally overblown, no offense.
Sure, there will be alpha clones used by older players to do ganking, maybe even genuinely new players will get into that. At the same time though, New Eden's economy gonna have a nice boost and there will be plenty of people that don't succumb to highsec treachery and go and do things like the Serpentis Hideaways or maybe go on public fleets and that sort of thing.
Free and no pressure is a good feature I have a good feeling about the upcoming clone states.
@lunettelulu7
|

Anasta Tahyan
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 22:10:53 -
[26] - Quote
If this would lead to an increase in ganking it might very well be intended by CCP since earlier studies have shown that players who get blown up early on in their EVE 'career' often choose to keep playing while players who grind PVE for a month without much meaningful player interaction quit. |

Mephiztopheleze
Laphroaig Inc.
980
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 22:33:37 -
[27] - Quote
More than any design change or game mechanics tweak or new skin or graphics update, EVE desperately needs more people logged in, undocked and shooting one another.
Alpha accounts have a lot of promise in this regard. Hopefully, they'll get new people into the game who will enjoy it and maybe start subscribing.
This will be good for everyone. You, me, the Alpha player having enough fun that they sub and, not least, CCP.
Occasional Resident Newbie Correspondent for TMC: http://themittani.com/search/site/mephiztopheleze
This is my Forum Main. My Combat Alt is sambo Inkura
|

Eternus8lux8lucis
Primus Inc. LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
1012
|
Posted - 2016.09.23 23:56:46 -
[28] - Quote
The neo-Nazi type issue will NEVER be an issue. CCP will squash that so fast itll make the guys head spin as he and all his alts, alpha or omegas, get the heaviest banhammer known to the viking world thrown at them.
The rest of the abuse of accounts is well documented in other threads. But in the end it will only create a range of new prices and new supply/demand to resettle at that CCP can tweak over the long term and really doesnt change much tbh as most major or even minor rebalances create such new supply/demand curves already.
As for what it SHOULD bring in? Thats easy. Anyone that likes Eve, has played it and wants to but cant afford it but enjoys the gameplay enough to keep an account. Then if you make isk further than the alphas skills you can buy injectors to add skills that arent a part of an alpha that if you WISH to or have spare isk or dollars sub and then use. It means you wont be shut out anymore if you have RL shitfests going on and you need the RL cash on something else or if you get bored of the game and want to play something else you dont have to ever stop completely anymore youll still have access to the game and game play.
So things like unsubbing accounts to take breaks wont be needed. You can just not pay for it and feel the sunk cost fallacy of the $$ or time spent plexing being "ugh" in nature for what you get out of the game atm.
For CCP it will mean WAY less of a yoyo in subs as people get bored, need breaks, go GRRRCCP!!! or whatever and unsub. As now these people can still log in every now and again and go do things without worrying about making that plex isk or dropping that cash. You can still fleet up, do most Eve activities of all sorts and still be a productive member of any group or team or even solo without that pressure. But you know that there are benefits to omega clones and its now your CHOICE. Its not all or nothing, its all or something at least. And THAT is a smart move by CCP for actual in space numbers.
Have you heard anything I've said?
You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?
That's right.
Had to end sometime.
|

sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
261
|
Posted - 2016.09.24 07:05:16 -
[29] - Quote
Elenahina wrote:I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are.
My corp (on my main), are already planning how the alpahes can be a wortwhile ressource in terms off lowsec "insta" locking thrasher gatecamp gangs. We do them now for newbs and vets alike, and people have fun on coms. The hope is some will subscribe for the SP heavier doctrines after having tasted the fun of playing the game and those who just want stay alpha are also fine.
"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker
|

Geronimo McVain
EVE University Ivy League
211
|
Posted - 2016.09.24 07:44:35 -
[30] - Quote
Elenahina wrote:I'll be curious to see how hard it is for Alpha accounts to join corporations in terms of people actually recruiting them - because of how limited they are. For some time Alphas are not different from new toons. So corps that accept noobs will have no problems accepting Alphas. IMHO nobody will stay a long time as an alpha when he hits the skill limit. You either sub or quit. The nice thing with Alphas is, that at this time they've got enough experience and skillpoints to Plex an account. I don't imagine alphas as a playing "class" but as a prolonged test phase. If Eve hooks you, you are in, if not you are out. The limits are that hard, that staying for a longer time as an alpha when you can't progress any more will be extremely frustrating and thats what CCP is counting on.
BTW: the mentioned problems will not be problems of Alphas but on the sociopathic behavior of us, the subscribed players. Noobs don't know enough to be a real annoyance apart from shittalk, which a lot of vet are experts in, and naming, which CCP will quickly take care of. |

Vincent Pelletier
Pelletier Imports and Exports
44
|
Posted - 2016.09.24 10:24:13 -
[31] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:I believe that your tinhattery about CCP ignoring concerns is pretty much the same for every minor change that comes about.
Very often I get the feeling that CCP doesn't fully understand the implications of a change, then proposes it to the CSM who instantly understand how to exploit it fully but because it benefits them they keep quiet.
Just like the new 400k starting SP with overheating and everything. I can fully see CCP going "we're going to increase starter SP, CSM could you think of a few skills that would be useful" and the 0.0 sock puppet CSM with gank alts going "well uuuuhm, overheating would be nice and lets make it so people can get into destroyers really easy not having to spend cash and time on support skill, for no real reason ofcourse.... just because". and CCP going "uuuhh ok". |

Pleasure Hub Node-514
Pleasure Hub Hotline
112
|
Posted - 2016.09.24 22:47:41 -
[32] - Quote
In terms of mass shitposting accounts, I think we've already been though this to some extent with free Dust 514 accounts. People survived (except for the shut down). It is fun reviewing the **** dust bunnies said in game.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCRLm-VVyB0
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKiN7Kt1Eh2bER5Z3FQNTAwYUU
In terms of corralling in-game and forum behavior there's certainly some improvements that can be made to moderation. I'm curious how the Valkyrie forum community is fairing with Discourse as a community moderation tool
'One night hauler' The tell all story of a pleasure bot in Jita 4-4
|

Piugattuk
Lima beans Corp
480
|
Posted - 2016.09.25 05:55:20 -
[33] - Quote
If I can use an alpha clone most likely I will use it to make incursions into WH space, null, and low sec, cause OP makes a valid point, I won't worry about trashing that toon to hell and back, on the flip side tho....it may make low Snickers happy as people will be more willing to go into those regions because people won't fret too much about alpha toons, I got an escalation today, didn't go because its in low sec, if I had an alpha clone it would have been on!
Maybe if CCP could give 1 alpha clone to paid accounts then it would be very useful to have that toon on our main accounts. |

Serene Repose
3056
|
Posted - 2016.09.25 07:13:26 -
[34] - Quote
Nothing will damage this community more than it being over run by people with nothing invested in it.
"...I do post about things I don't know about more often than I probably should (...I post...as I fly...recklessly).
-Dirty Forum Alt-
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |