|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1213
|
Posted - 2016.10.12 17:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:This does not go far enough, and the EULA could be simplified greatly.
In-game items should not be exchangeable for ANY out of games goods or services, period.
So you couldn't donate isk to the people who coded Evemon, EFT, PYFA, Dotlan etc?
No more PLEX for X charities?
Not all out-of-game goods and services are tied to RMT, not are they all the devil. And I would much rather throw the person coding Evemon an in game donation of day 1 bil isk so they can focus less on making money in eve and more time on enjoying the game given the work they have done.
Now you could argue that it is not an exchange. They give the item freely, I choose to donate. There is no official exchange. However, EULA are full of lawyer speak so perhaps their wording covers this best. |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1213
|
Posted - 2016.10.12 17:42:08 -
[2] - Quote
Obil Que wrote:Lasisha Mishi wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:
Updates & Clarifications:
The 90 day clause:
Our policy on inactive accounts has not changed, we have simply shortened the notice period from six months to three months due to a potentially higher volume of account creation.
so this doesn't mean our accoutns WILL be deleted after 90 days of not logging it. it just means that we'll be warned 90 days IF the supply of accounts becomes to many. correct? also with eve-bet being...outlawed........will we have some form of ingame betting (as its fun to bet on teams for the alliance tournament.) Right now: CCP has the right to terminate your account immediately if you don't pay After: CCP will notify you 90 days before terminating you if you don't pay Reality: CCP hasn't ever used this clause Why people are up in arms about getting 90 days notice to something CCP currently has the right to do immediately is beyond me.
Actually, they did terminate accounts once. It was of trial only accounts and freed up a ton of single character names. |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1213
|
Posted - 2016.10.12 18:21:07 -
[3] - Quote
Prt Scr wrote:Have i read the new EULA correctly?
I can set up and run a 'eve online gambling site' just like the ones that are running or where running before closed for RMT, providing that it is a scam and the only 'winner 'is me?
No. This has already been covered in the EULA. A while back There were common scams with people using API to "show wallet transactions" to prove they were legit isk doublers. CCP banned using external sites for scamming at that point as they were getting too many service tickets blaming the API. Your suggestion would fall into the same category. |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1213
|
Posted - 2016.10.12 22:55:20 -
[4] - Quote
Takamori Saig0 wrote:With regard to Alpha accounts, its clear from the wording that you are not allowed to play more than one alpha account at a time.
I think from the wording that it is ok to play an alpha account at the same time as any number of Omega accounts, which would make sense as you are paying for those, but I dont think the wording is explicit on this. So, is it ok to use an Alpha account to assist your omega accounts, using them at the same time ? Eg, an Alpha hauler alt helping your Omega miner toons ?
You should read the Dev Blog regarding the CSM and Clone State round up. From that blog:
"Simultaneous Logon for Alphas:
The CSMGÇÖs number one focus for Clone States matched the biggest concern from general player feedback: simultaneous Alpha clone logon must be limited. We agree and so we are planning to implement restrictions that keep any Alpha account from passing character select if another EVE client is already active. This will be true even if the other client is Omega. Bypassing these restrictions will also be a breach of the EULA and may lead to penalties and punishments and all that nasty stuff that our security team does if they catch you being bad."
So the changes to the EULA pertain to this design by providing a contractual agreement to cover CCP's posterior region. |
|
|
|