EVE Search - Capital cruise missiles? or some other form?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Capital cruise missiles? or some other form?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
000Hunter000 Gallente Magners Marauders	Posted - 2007.03.25 11:42:00 - [1] Would this be a good idea? or pointless? would it be too uber or too weak? The reason why i'm asking is cuz all the turret users have 2 cap ship types (for instance dual 1000mm railgun I and ion siege blaster cannon I) but missile users only have citadel torps? Please atleast try to keep it constructive Resized tag... again... hope this pleases the tag ninjas from ccp... again :p
Alpine 69 Slacker Industries Exuro Mortis	Posted - 2007.03.25 11:47:00 - [2] seems a good idea to me
DarkElf Caldari Veto.	Posted - 2007.03.25 11:49:00 - [3] i have thought about that before. seems very odd that they didn't introduce them. i guess there must have been a reason. maybe they just forgot DE
Cookie Snatcher Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2007.03.25 11:50:00 - [4] and dont forget that some missile bonuses dont even apply to citadel torps
000Hunter000 Gallente Magners Marauders	Posted - 2007.03.25 11:56:00 - [5] well i just realized there must be some point to them. Anways why would someone take siege rails over siege blasters? Rails have longer range then blasters i guess? But blasters do more damage? Mebbe do the same for citadels and siege cruise, citadels are the big sluggers but siege cruise are faster and longer range? (like it is now with standard cm and torps) Resized tag... again... hope this pleases the tag ninjas from ccp... again :p
Malthros Zenobia Caldari Independent Navy Reserve	Posted - 2007.03.25 16:04:00 - [6] If Citadel Cruise were released, people would whine and cry that the Phoenix is way too good against Battleships and other ships due to them. They'd be completely ignoring the 1000DPS you get from Moros heavy drones, but they'd still whine about it.I'd like to see them though. Dreads in general need to get bigger and badder though. You're suppose to get a dread if you want pure pwnage and damage, but Carriers are much more useful (and can tank a POS), Motherships wouldn't be a far comparison though, simply because they're supercapitals. Perhaps we need a second teir of dreads, and XL POS towers, and seige turrets for POS defense. Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Prime Orbital Systems	Posted - 2007.03.25 17:21:00 - [7] Never thought about that, but it makes alot of sense. (Screw the phoenix being overpowered, exactly what you said, look at the moros.) -- Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes - Devil ([email protected])
Murehz	Posted - 2007.03.25 17:24:00 - [8] It would be awsome to see large missiles slowly plowing acorss the grid to hit something.
Cookie Snatcher Gallente Center for Advanced Studies	Posted - 2007.03.25 17:24:00 - [9] also minnie dread would benefit from those launchers.
Cpt Abestos Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2007.03.25 17:36:00 - [10] Originally by: 000Hunter000 well i just realized there must be some point to them. Anways why would someone take siege rails over siege blasters? Rails have longer range then blasters i guess? But blasters do more damage? Mebbe do the same for citadels and siege cruise, citadels are the big sluggers but siege cruise are faster and longer range? (like it is now with standard cm and torps) Rails are much better because of their range, you get around 60km opt+ 25-30k falloff with AM in rails, but only 7.5km+25-30km falloff with blasters, meaning while the extra dps is nice, youre going to be way out of range of a large tower.
Kar Anshral	Posted - 2007.03.25 18:37:00 - [11] Originally by: Cpt Abestos Originally by: 000Hunter000 well i just realized there must be some point to them. Anways why would someone take siege rails over siege blasters? Rails have longer range then blasters i guess? But blasters do more damage? Mebbe do the same for citadels and siege cruise, citadels are the big sluggers but siege cruise are faster and longer range? (like it is now with standard cm and torps) Rails are much better because of their range, you get around 60km opt+ 25-30k falloff with AM in rails, but only 7.5km+25-30km falloff with blasters, meaning while the extra dps is nice, youre going to be way out of range of a large tower. It always puzzled me why it takes the range to the tower and not the range to the shield, after all you're not actually shooting the tower but rather the shield which is a 30km bubble around that tower. sitting right at the edge of the shield should be point blank range and not 30km.
Tunajuice Convergent Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2007.03.25 19:03:00 - [12] Originally by: Kar Anshral Originally by: Cpt Abestos Originally by: 000Hunter000 well i just realized there must be some point to them. Anways why would someone take siege rails over siege blasters? Rails have longer range then blasters i guess? But blasters do more damage? Mebbe do the same for citadels and siege cruise, citadels are the big sluggers but siege cruise are faster and longer range? (like it is now with standard cm and torps) Rails are much better because of their range, you get around 60km opt+ 25-30k falloff with AM in rails, but only 7.5km+25-30km falloff with blasters, meaning while the extra dps is nice, youre going to be way out of range of a large tower. It always puzzled me why it takes the range to the tower and not the range to the shield, after all you're not actually shooting the tower but rather the shield which is a 30km bubble around that tower. sitting right at the edge of the shield should be point blank range and not 30km. Because then they would have to rebalance it against everyone using 5km range ammo.. instead of now, the larger the tower the longer range ammo you need.
Sokratesz Guardians of Hell's Gate v2.0 Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2007.03.25 19:57:00 - [13] blasters with tungsten >> rails with AM on moros. They use far less cap too. Originally by: Mastin Dragonfly Radio is essential for Amarr, to call the much needed backup...
Kar Anshral	Posted - 2007.03.26 00:00:00 - [14] Originally by: Tunajuice Originally by: Kar Anshral ... Because then they would have to rebalance it against everyone using 5km range ammo.. instead of now, the larger the tower the longer range ammo you need. Perhaps, but right now a moros pilot uses rails with antimatter against medium and large towers. Ion siege blasters are not very suited to strike against those because of range issues. IIRC the rails do more dps with AM then the blasters do with suitably ranged ammo.

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.