EVE Search - BSAC - - Block Ships and Ammunitions Corporation -

All Channels

Market Discussions

BSAC - - Block Ships and Ammunitions Corporation - - MRBLOCKBOZ15 PAID

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Caldari FTW123 School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 4	Posted - 2011.04.08 16:40:00 - [31] - Quote SencneS wrote: Caldari FTW123 wrote: a) There is no distinction just because you use a different character name, it's still you b) I wasn't saying you are lying about getting the isk from BSAC, I am saying there is a direct conflict of interest between the person vouching for trust of BSAC and the fact that said person represents BSAC directly as part of it's board. You are not an independent voice. While the person sitting behind the keyboard is the same, posting from an EBANK perspective is not wrong. Remove the person what happened? EBANK requested 23 B from BSA, and BSA paid it... Either you can choose to use this as a sign of trust, or at least honor of debt or you don't. The message about what was done is important, not the messenger. That's a nice way to look at it .. "I didn't scam, my alt BurgleBurger did!" riiiiight.
Poison Forge Laboratories 1	Posted - 2011.04.08 16:46:00 - [32] - Quote Caldari FTW123 wrote: That's a nice way to look at it .. "I didn't scam, my alt BurgleBurger did!" riiiiight. To bad this only applies to your flaming and not to bsac.
SencneS Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks 7	Posted - 2011.04.08 16:50:00 - [33] - Quote Caldari FTW123 wrote: That's a nice way to look at it .. "I didn't scam, my alt BurgleBurger did!" riiiiight. You're focus is on the wrong spot and people wonder why I take things personally... What is more important... 1) The act of doing something? 2) The person report the act the was done? You're focusing on who reported the fact, it could have been Ray or AC155 that posted that EBANK received 23B from BSA, would that have made any difference? Apparently to you that is the differences. I'm arguing there is no difference on saying that someone did something, but more importantly the fact that something was done. Here is an example.. I'll say that Caldari FTW123 scammed me out of 10 B ISK. What is the first thing that needs to be confirmed? Was 10B ISK really scammed and where is the evidence of that scam. You would agree this is primary concern correct? In this case, I said EBANK got 23B from BSA.. BSA Honored a withdrawal. I can produce screen shots and API logs of BSA sending this character the 23B ISK, and this character sending that ISK to an EBANK in-game corporate wallet. The evidence of the act is easily obtainable. That is all that matters. That is the focus, the deep down sliver of information that holds priority. What you do with that information is up to you.. You're focusing on who sent the message?? How silly is that! Ignore the real tangible information, it's who said it that is important to you.. I'm sorry to say, that's shallow, and not really well thought out.
Caldari FTW123 School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State 4	Posted - 2011.04.08 16:51:00 - [34] - Quote Poison wrote: Caldari FTW123 wrote: That's a nice way to look at it .. "I didn't scam, my alt BurgleBurger did!" riiiiight. To bad this only applies to your flaming and not to bsac. huh? FYI I am not criticising BSAC, I made it clear a while ago I've lost interest in it .. people will put their money where they want, I'm not the MD sherrif, I just found it funny that SenceS vouches for something (s)he represents in an official capacity. Personally, I hope BSAC is legit in the end, that along with EBANK finally paying out will at least put smiley faces on the MD forum.
Elise DarkStar DarkCorp Capital Group 2	Posted - 2011.04.08 18:10:00 - [35] - Quote SencneS wrote: Elise... lol wtf. Honestly can't finish reading it because it's so convoluted. I'll make my usual disclaimer that I'm not actually talking "with" sencnes because he's too ******* stupid to maintain consistent and coherent dialogue. If someone else who can actually maintain a productive dialogue would like to champion his cause, then do please post. Otherwise, I stand by my assertion that a ponzi paying out 5% of its alleged NAV means nothing and actually happens all the time.
SencneS Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks 7	Posted - 2011.04.08 18:22:00 - [36] - Quote Elise DarkStar wrote: lol wtf. Honestly can't finish reading it because it's so convoluted. I WIN!!!! YAY Troll of Elise successful, mark that off my bucket list!
Cheque Please Hot Like Mexico 2	Posted - 2011.04.08 18:24:00 - [37] - Quote BSAC is shining example to the rest of MD I am proud to support BSAC and its continuing dedication spree of excellence
Block Ukx Forge Laboratories 30	Posted - 2011.04.09 18:50:00 - [38] - Quote MRBLOCKBOZ15 zero coupon bond PAID. Principal: 10,000,000,000 ISK Interest: 300,000,000 ISK

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.