Solonius Rex
F0RCED ENTRY
Domestic Disturbance
351
   |
Posted - 2016.11.05 07:00:48 -
[1] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:
PROPOSED CHANGES
1) Remove ship insurance for low-sec and null-sec. This means not only that you cannot buy insurance in low-sec and null-sec, but that any insurance bought in high-sec will not payout for ships lost in low-sec and null-sec. Also, bar high-sec insurance from low-security individuals, criminals, etc, meaning if any of those folks travel to high-sec to do business, they cannot insure their ships while travelling in high-sec.
Rationale: High-sec pussies should be unaffected. They live and travel exclusively in high-sec, they have high-security statuses, etc. They can continue to procure insurance for their mining vessels or whatever. True tough guys should be unaffected as well. True tough guys don't want and don't need pussy insurance, and indeed don't carry pussy insurance, not only because 'insurance is for pussies,' but because it also screws up risk/reward, action/consequence, etc. For the true tough guy, if you live by the sword, you shall accept the risk of dying by the sword. For the true tough guy, there are no safe places in Eve. No, it is only the false tough guy, the pussy in disguise, the hypocrite, who is targeted by this. These pussies want to proclaim their elite PvP statuses and credentials, flaunt their pirate images, etc. while at the same time fly under the protection of pussy insurance. And you will know who they are by their objections below.
Absurd. Null and losec are the exact people that needs insurance because they are the ones living in a section of space where they can freely be engaged and die. Its a lot easier not to die in hisec as long as you are paying attention. In null, even if you pay attention you can still die.
Quote:
2) Remove clone jumping from low-sec and null-sec, and also from low-security individuals. Meaning A) clone jumping can only happen from high-sec to high-sec, and B) low-security individuals cannot clone jump at all. Optionally, reimburse skill points sunk into this, but then again why do we want to coddle false tough guys who made use of this while accusing others of being pussies? Rationale: Only pussies should be able to travel not only instantaneously, but completely safely as well. And only pussies should be protected from losing expensive implants. The true tough guy doesn't need the protection of pussy insurance (which is all this is) to save him from losing expensive implants. But the pussy in tough-guy disguise? Well we don't care about him, thus he is being targeted here, and ferreted out. Know him by his objections below.
Even more absurd. When you hold sov and need to move to a section of space quickly because its under attack or because someone needs help, you need jump clones. This isnt the case in hisec.
Quote:
3) Remove safe logout/logoff from low-sec and null-sec, and from low-security individuals. Rationale: Why on earth should true tough guys want or need "safe logout?" This kind of nonsense is the domain and purview of pussies only. All true tough guys should support this change - they don't want, need, or use safe logout. But the pussy in tough-guy disguise will cry and whine - he wants to have his cake and eat it too, you see. Again, know him by his objections below.
Uh, what about supercaps?
But seriously, when youre in hostile space after a huge battle that raged for hours and lost, do you really expect the losing side to have to self destruct? Or if you are stuck between a gatecamp, should you have to either die or self destruct yourself? I mean, wtf?
Quote:
4) No free noob ships in low-sec, null-sec, nor for low-security individuals. It is amazing how much utility these things have. I myself use them all the time to scout gates and null-sec areas, to transport goods, etc. I see no reason why the true tough guy should want, or need, a free noob ship. He wants to face all consequences in this game, and he wants no coddling or 'free ride' in any way, shape, or form. No, it is the pussy in tough-guy disguise who wants to have his cake and eat it too. It is the pussy in tough-guy disguise who wants to point the finger of accusation at the true pussy, and accuse him of being a pussy, rather than look into his own mirror and see the pussy staring back at him.
I'm sure this is a woefully incomplete list. So I ask for help not only from the true pussies out there who don't deny being pussies, but also from the true
Your proposed changes isnt going to make low/null more dangerous, just more tedious. Like adding a 100 million isk tax charge on every market transaction. They are stupid suggestions that have no merit beyond "hurr durr lets make it more annoying to live in null/low because reasons" .
You want to make it more difficult to live in null? Use Autopilot. |