| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Khanivore
The Kingsmen
The Makhai
   |
Posted - 2007.03.31 15:59:00 -
[1]
Q Ships From that you can kinda see where I'm going
You have your hauler/transport/freighter going from A to B the enemy jumps in for a kill and hopefully a ton of loot but you have a very nasty surprise waiting for them.
Like the covert ops ships it would require a module to make it really work and allow you to spot that its not a simple cargo vessel but something that can fight once your in close - 2km like the cloak. Once activated it gives the scanner/probes/eyeball mk1 a false target of the above mentioned hauler, transport or freighter
Its stats for armor, shields, structure similar to a cruiser/battle cruiser for the small class, battle cruiser/battleship for medium and battleship/dreadnought for the large.
Rather than trying to reprogram the means to hide the turrets, there wont be any weapon high slots. The weapons are parked in the hold, you launch them like you would drones but they act like secure cans but no need to anchor to use them.
The weapons come in the usual small (frigate), medium (cruiser) or large (battleship) sizes for each of the different class of Q Ship in the familiar Lasers, Hybrids, Missiles and Projectiles. Maybe even go so far as the insane firepower of capital weapons!!!
I await your responses
|
exozone
Gallente
Atomic Heroes
|
Posted - 2007.03.31 16:22:00 -
[2]
hmmm, very sneaky Mr. Khanivore, i like your style 
|
Rosur
|
Posted - 2007.03.31 22:46:00 -
[3]
Nice idea.
That would be fun to play with 
|
Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express
Frontier Trade League
|
Posted - 2007.04.01 07:05:00 -
[4]
Very nice idea :).
You could have Pop Up Turrets, they wouldn't actually appear on the outside of the ship. They would remain inside the ship until fired.
I like the idea of Q Ships though, they were used in WWII a lot :)
Galactic Express Recruitment Post
Thoughts expressed are mine and |
raven415
Caldari
Special Projects Corp
|
Posted - 2007.04.05 09:28:00 -
[5]
very good idea and i do think that it should be considered. it has historical fact behind it and as always we do end up repeating the past.
|
Robert VonBraun
|
Posted - 2007.04.05 12:52:00 -
[6]
Good Idea, ship would have to be all offensive and very weak defensively as it would just become another cruiser. ship would have to register as a Badger II or so with no way other than a ship scanner to tell the difference.
|
Taran Summers
The Merovingians
|
Posted - 2007.04.06 18:48:00 -
[7]
THATS NOT A FREIGHTER! THATS A DREAD! |
Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.06 20:20:00 -
[8]
 Originally by: Robert VonBraun
Good Idea, ship would have to be all offensive and very weak defensively as it would just become another cruiser. ship would have to register as a Badger II or so with no way other than a ship scanner to tell the difference.
An non rig enhanced ship scanner preferrably
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |